Rachel’s Law: Opposing lawyer also represents al-qaeda chemical factory

By creeping

In yesterday’s post Sharia Momentarily Thwarted in NY, the key word was momentarily. The passing of the libel tourism bill couldn’t be celebrated long.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Manhattan author Rachel Ehrenfeld’s lawsuit to stop the billionaire, Khalid Salim A. Bin Mahfouz, from trying to collect on a default judgment obtained against Ehrenfeld in London.

Stephen J. Brogan, a lawyer for Bin Mahfouz [other bin Mahfouz law suits here], did not immediately return a phone message requesting comment. Read the court opinion here.

It turns out the Stephen J. Brogan is also representing EL-SHIFA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES COMPANY and SALAH EL DIN AHMED MOHAMMED IDRIS. If El-Shifa Pharmaceutical doesn’t ring a bell – it should.

Brogan

On August 7, 1998 the U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya were attacked by al-qaeda, killing 200+ and injuring 5,000+ a full three years before most of us ever heard about bin Laden or al-qaeda. In retaliation, then President Bill Clinton, ordered air strikes (video) on several locations including the El-Shifa plant which was believed to be manufacturing chemical weapons for bin Laden (the CNN report – they almost seem pro-America back then).

The FBI claimed to find evidence at the plant after the bombing, confirming intelligence they had leading to the attack. Detractors have since attempted to discredit the intelligence and claim the factory was simply for pharmaceuticals. Brogan and his team of American lawyers have been fighting for the $50 million settlement ever since.

It should be no surprise then that the Saudi’s are seeking to silence American truth tellers, and using American lawyers to silence them. Brogan, by the way is the top dog at Jones Day, one of the largest international law firms in the U.S. Jones Day contributed $230,000+ to the Obama campaign.

MSM finally gets the story – says Ehrenfeld’s book is the “source of trouble”

Tags: , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to “Rachel’s Law: Opposing lawyer also represents al-qaeda chemical factory”

  1. Free Speech Vs. Lawsuit Terrorism « Creeping Sharia Says:

    [...] (don’t forget about the American lawyers who facilitate these lawsuits against Americans – back story here) [...]

  2. Has Obama, or anyone else, read the 9-11 Commission Report? « Creeping Sharia Says:

    [...] facts while claiming Bush misled someone into war. Also of great importance to note is that the lawyers defending the al Shifa chemical factory, Jones Day, are large contributors to the Obama [...]

  3. Free Speech Update: Rep. King Urges Protection for U.S. Authors « Creeping Sharia Says:

    [...] on our freedom. Back stories on Rachel’s Law here (including the al-qaeda reppin’ law firm that donated big $ to Obama). An update from [...]

Leave a Reply