Who is Al-Qaeda’s law firm?
Matthew Vadum exposes them as the Center for Constitutional Rights. His piece below is a must read and concludes the law firm is worthy of critical examination by the media.
Alternatively, the blogosphere can, and already has critically examined CCR.
The Autonomist has an extensive post from 2005 revealing much, much more disturbing information on the Center for Constitutional Rights, its communist founders, and its anti-American history.
A cursory search for info reveals the following about CCR:
- its purpose is to use litigation to weaken our nation’s resolve
- it is planning the prosecution of President Bush and other high administration officials for war crimes
- its president wrote a book praising Che Guevara
- its president contributes to Barack Obama’s campaign & as do individuals working for CCR
- it accepts donations from Islamic groups including CAIR-Ohio
- founded in 1966 by Morton Stavis, William Kunstler, Ben Smith and Arthur Kinoy – all members of either the Communist Party or radical left…CCR has legally represented, consistently and almost exclusively, Communists, violent leftist revolutionaries, far-left groups and individuals, cop-killers and sworn enemies of the United States (source) and now focuses on Islamic terrorists
Al-Qaeda’s Law Firm
By Matthew Vadum & Capital Research Center – Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Much has already been written of the U.S. Supreme Court’s lawless, nonsensical decision in Boumediene v. Bush that gives America’s terrorist enemies unprecedented access to our civilian court system, but little has been written about the aggressively anti-American public interest law firm that helped to make it happen.*
The nonprofit Center for Constitutional Rights, which acted as co-counsel in the case, is deeply enmeshed in the politics of terrorism (take one guess on whose side) and has even taken money from groups linked to terrorism. CCR donors include the Ohio branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Safa Trust Inc., and the International Institute of Islamic Thought, all of which have been accused of connections to Islamist terror groups.
CCR is now jumping for joy, absurdly hailing the June 12 decision as a great triumph for the Constitution. (I profiled CCR two years ago, noting that the disturbingly effective group was at the forefront of the legal left’s push to give due process rights to America’s terrorist enemies.)
And yet the media doesn’t care to investigate CCR and its terrorist money trail, treating the fifth column law firm as a legitimate player in constitutional jurisprudence.
Media outlets’ descriptions of CCR are innocuous. Following the Boumediene decision, media described the Center as: “a public interest law firm that represented 37 detainees before the Supreme Court”(Baltimore Sun, no link); the firm that “has represented Guantanamo Bay detainees since 2002″ (Washington Post); the firm that has “filed the first lawsuits challenging the detentions” (Houston Chronicle); and, as a firm that “supports habeas corpus cases” (Philadelphia Daily News).
The Center, founded by radical attorney William Kunstler in 1966, has spent more than four decades trying to obstruct U.S. foreign policy and is anything but innocuous.
The Center scored a major legal victory in 2004 when the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Rasul v. Bush that its clients, 16 foreign nationals captured during U.S. hostilities with the Taliban in Afghanistan, had the legal right to challenge their detentions in U.S. civilian courts.
CCR is now using the courts to pick the deep pockets of corporations in order to undermine national security and advance its foreign policy agenda. In one transparently vexatious lawsuit, the Center sued heavy-machinery maker Caterpillar, Inc., after an American protester was run over by an Israeli military Caterpillar D9 bulldozer on a mission in the “no man’s land” near the Egyptian border in 2003. CCR has also sued private contractors CACI International Inc. and Titan International for their alleged connection to prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib prison.
The Center for Constitutional Rights is headed by Michael Ratner, a wealthy communist who wrote a book praising mass murderer Che Guevara. Ratner, who is brother of New Jersey Nets owner/eminent domain abuser Bruce Ratner and journalist Ellen Ratner, recruited hundreds of pro bono lawyers to represent those held at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay. He favors putting the U.S. on trial for war crimes but opposed doing the same to Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. “If you want any kind of sense of legitimacy or fairness, you can’t just go after Saddam Hussein,” he told “Democracy Now” in 2003.
Ratner has said Cuba’s “accomplishments” under Castro have been “great,” and has denounced the U.S. “onslaught against the Cuban Revolution,” and the prosecution of the Cuban Five, spies convicted in Miami in 2001. He calls the late President Ronald Reagan a murderer.
Ratner addressed an exercise in extremist political theater, the “International Commission of Inquiry On Crimes Against Humanity Committed by the Bush Administration,” at which he compared the president to Adolf Hitler and accused him of formulating a “plan for what has to be called a coup-d’etat in America.”
CCR also employs the granddaughter of the executed spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. The Rosenbergs, under the direction of the KGB, helped pass U.S. atomic bomb secrets to the Soviet Union. CCR publicly embraced radical human rights lawyer Lynne Stewart, a vocal supporter of Islamic fundamentalism who was convicted of providing material support for Islamic terrorists.
CCR is funded by liberals, socialists, air-headed utopian idealists, communists, America haters, and traitors. The firm has received donations from George Soros’s Open Society Institute, Progressive Insurance’s Peter B. Lewis, intellectual Noam Chomsky, actors Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon, “Stalin’s songbird” folk singer Pete Seeger, and the late Isabel Johnson Hiss (second wife of the late Soviet spy Alger Hiss).
Surely such an interesting law firm deserves a critical examination by the media.
*(John Yoo had an excellent op-ed entitled “The Supreme Court Goes to War” in the June 17 Wall Street Journal, and on the other side the Washington Post’s Dan Froomkin wrote a ridiculous, orgiastic, ahistorical ballad in which he grossly misrepresents the views of the Founding Fathers.)
Capital Research Center (CRC) was established in 1984 to study non-profit organizations, with a special focus on reviving the American traditions of charity, philanthropy, and voluntarism.
Tags: al qaeda, Communism, Creeping Sharia, Cuba, islam, jihad, Legal, Life, News, Obama, Politics
