Updates to the judge-suing Muslim broad in Michigan. From Atlas Shrugs via AnsweringMuslims:
Hijabi hoochie?
A Muslim woman who is suing a Wayne County judge for making her remove a religious scarf during a court proceeding says that several cell phones containing nude photos of her were stolen during a burglary at her house.
Raneen Albaghdady, 33, called police March 27 after she found her house in the 25000 block of Andover ransacked. Among the items taken were six cell phones that she told police had nude photos on them.
She said she suspected an ex-boyfriend was responsible for the break-in, and that she was worried he may post the photos on the Internet, because he previously had posted other pictures of her online, police said.
The incident could come into play as her lawsuit against 3rd Circuit Court Family Division Judge William Callahan moves forward.
Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in August, the suit alleges that Callahan denied Albaghdady’s religious freedom when he made her remove her hijab during a June name change hearing in his Detroit courtroom.
“It’s out of sheer modesty of appearance and dress and covering your beauty,” she said. “When one is accustomed to wearing the hijab, to a certain way of dress, to a certain way of acting, to have to then uncover, you almost feel revealed or definitely very vulnerable, but understandably so, humiliated and embarrassed.”
Except when taking nude cell phone pics for one, or more, of your boyfriends, or ex-boyfriends. That kind of modesty.
Callahan has maintained that he didn’t know the hijab was a religious garment. A courtroom video of the exchange between Callahan and Albaghdady went as follows:
Callahan: “The headpiece…,” while gesturing to remove the piece.
Albaghdady: “I’m sorry?”
Callahan: “No hats allowed in the courtroom.”
Man seated in courtroom: “It’s not a hat. It’s a scarf.”
Callahan: “Excuse me, sir.”
Albaghdady: “This one?” pointing at her hijab.
Callahan: “No hats allowed in the courtroom.”
Albaghdady: “This one?”
Callahan: “Yes.”
Albaghdady: “OK. It doesn’t matter.”
She then removed the piece.
Didn’t matter until the CAIRorists got involved?
The case currently is under consideration for dismissal or summary judgment by presiding Judge Marianne Battani. The motion was filed by the Michigan Attorney General’s Office, which is representing Callahan, and seeks to have the suit thrown out on judicial immunity guidelines.
Assistant Attorney General Margaret Nelson on Thursday said the motion centers on the legal basis of Albaghdady’s claim, not the factual basis. But she said the cell phone photos could prove germane if the motion is denied. “If we lose this motion then the next step would be to develop the facts,” she said. “And that’s certainly something that we would look to develop at the time.”
Canton Township attorney Nabih Ayad, who is representing Albaghdady, said that the photos would have no bearing if the case goes to trial. A telephone call to Albaghdady seeking comment for this story was not returned as of press time.
“People convert to religions all the time, so the fact that she may have taken some photos for her husband sometime in the past is of no significance to this case,” he said.
A convert? When did Raneen Albaghdady convert to Islam? And what was she doing with six cell phones?
Filed under: Creeping Sharia, Legal, Media, Michigan, News, Politics, Religion, Sharia, Stealth Jihad Tagged: | cair, Creeping Sharia, hamas, islam, law, Legal, Life, litigation jihad, Media, Muslim, News, Politics, Random, Religion, Sharia
on one side you’ve got Muslims who say that wearing the hijab is a religious requirement, and yet you have others who say it is a matter of choice and is more cultural than religious
as for modesty why is the woman wearing such tight clothing? it does nothing but emphasize her excellent rack
Is it just me or did I recall every hijab coming down and covering the neck as well? This woman seems to be wearing a scarf as an accessory and not a religious item. And interestingly, she gave in to removing it too quickly if it had been in fact a religious haijb.
When she said, “OK. It doesn’t matter”, she pretty much admitted that it really wasn’t religious. No true Muslim would have given in so quickly or ever claimed it did not matter.
Sounds like this judge has never heard of the free exercise clause.
wonder how much they paid this whore to use her in Jihad lawfare??
obviously her dress with tight bodice showing her bosom is not modest, or the gobs of makeup to call attention to her. Six cellphones of nude pix?? c’mon she was selling them to men! boyfriend? more like her pimp!
The way she is wearing the scarf is not HIJAB – see the lady in same image – it is merely looking like a fashion accessory and in animal print with a black sheer sexy thing on top!! If she came to court in this whorish get-up what does she wear on normal day?
what a load of crap
even giving her benefit of the doubt– is the judge a mindreader? how was he supposed to assume that is religious garb?? sure doesn’t look like it to me- she looks like any Latina or Greek or Italian woman who dresses sexy.
If she’s so devout,why does pictures of her nude exist?Cough(hypocrite)cough.
Interestingly, in an Islamic country if she had been exposing herself to a boyfriend so he could get pictures of her, since he was not a member of her family, she would have been jailed and beaten for shaming Islam and her family.
She is lucky that she is in America and can abuse our justice system with this nonsense.
This is a deal gone bad. She posed in those photos for her boyfriend to pimp in high society so she could earn mega bucks and share the loot with him.
She reneged on teh deal. Boyfriend publishes.
Don’t ever fall for the filthy muslim Taqiyyah.
Look at the whore’s face. It’s got money written all over it.
Remember how everything was always a black and white issue? Well, get ready for the Islamic-white battle lines to be drawn all aided by political correctness, and we all know who loses that war.
This is America the land of freedom anyone can wear what they want if this lady wants to cover up so let it be!
It seems that the administrators of this site tend to be bias were the heck is freedom of speech
With 6 phones in play she could retire from her present job, open an OTB booth and provide other treats in the back room where where noone will be checking her hijab. The courts need to throw out these nuisance lawsuits. They make up the rules as they go along, but then too so did the prophet.
[...] like-minded friends in the U.S. Some of these stylin’ hijabi’s send their boyfriends nude photos on cell phones then use terror-linked Muslim groups to sue judges over their modesty. And some [...]
[...] Creeping Sharia A Muslim woman who is suing a Wayne County judge for making her remove a religious scarf during a [...]
She would make great war booty. CAIR is probably upset that she ‘converted ‘.
mmm she is soo sexy,would love to have a piece of her!
in court you are suppose to remove a hat, so it is okay to remove a scarf.
You worry about scarf but there is nude picture.
she’s not even what a Muslim is supposed to be like, she’s a slag
It was great!
Thank you for sharing …