DOD official refuses to acknowledge the threat of radical Islam (video)

He actually refused to even use the term Islamic when referring to Islamic terrorists. Coward.

Read this entire list of ten by Patrick Poole at PJ Media » Obama’s National Security ‘Not Top 10′ of 2011. We’ll single out #9 on the list as it was covered briefly in this post a few days ago [“If you kill in this country under the banner of jihad, we’re told it isn’t terrorism”], and in full context below with video:

9) DOD official refuses to acknowledge the threat of radical Islam during hearing on terror threats to the U.S. military (December 10)

In one of the most comical, and equally tragic, interchanges in recent congressional history, during a joint Senate/House Homeland Security hearing on “Homegrown Terrorism: The Threat to Military Communities Inside the United States,” Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas’ Security Affairs Paul Stockton was asked by Rep. Dan Lungren (R-CA), former attorney general of the state of California, on the source of the threat to America and its troops. The exchange proceeded as follows:

REPRESENTATIVE DANIEL LUNGREN (R-CA): Secretary Stockton, are we at war with violent Islamist extremism?

MR. STOCKTON: No, sir. We are at war with al-Qaeda, its affiliates –

REP. LUNGREN: OK, I understand that. My question is, is violent Islamist extremism at war with us?

MR. STOCKTON: No, sir. We are being attacked by al-Qaeda and its allies.

REP. LUNGREN: Is al-Qaeda — can it be described as being an exponent of violent Islamist extremism?

MR. STOCKTON: They — al-Qaeda are murderers with an ideological agenda –

REP. LUNGREN: No, I — that’s not my question. That wasn’t my question. My question was, is al-Qaeda acting out violent Islamist extremism?

MR. STOCKTON: Al-Qaeda is a violent organization dedicated to overthrowing the values that we intend to advance –

REP. LUNGREN: So is it yes or no?

MR. STOCKTON: Can I hear the question again? I’ll make it as clear as I can. We are not at war with Islam. And it is not –

REP. LUNGREN: I didn’t ask that — I did not ask that, sir. I asked whether we’re at war with violent Islamist extremism. That’s my question.

MR. STOCKTON: No, we’re at war with al-Qaeda and its affiliates.

It gets worse from there, as you can see in the video of the full exchange:

Predictably, Time magazine blogger Mark Thompson faulted Lungren for the surreal exchange, likening it to “Anti-Islamic Hyperventilation.” Mind you, this is after:

  • Sgt. Hasan Karim Akbar killed two fellow soldiers and wounded 14 more in an ambush at an Army camp in Kuwait just days before the invasion of Iraq in March 2003;
  • Four Muslim converts were arrested for planning an attack on a California National Guard armory in August 2005;
  • Six Muslim men were caught planning and training for an attack on troops at Fort Dix in May 2007;
  • Four Muslim converts from New York were arrested while executing a terror plot that included bringing down military airplanes at Stewart Air National Guard Base in May 2009;
  • A Muslim convert and self-described jihadist, Carlos Bledsoe (aka Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad) gunned down Army Pvt. William Long and wounded Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula as the pair stood in front of an Army recruiting center in Little Rock in June 2009;
  • Seven Muslim men from North Carolina were arrested for plotting an attack on the Marine base at Quantico;
  • Major Nidal Hasan killed 13 and wounds 29 in a terror attack at Fort Hood in November 2009 after the Army had been warned about Hasan’s contact with Al-Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki;
  • A Muslim immigrant, Arif Uka, opened fire on a bus carrying U.S. soldiers at the Frankfurt, Germany airport in March 2011, killing two soldiers;
  • Two Muslim converts were arrested for planning an attack on a Seattle-area military processing center in June 2011;
  • Pvt. Naser Jason Abdo was arrested and charged in July 2011 with planning a terror attack and compiling components for a bomb targeting Fort Hood just weeks after he had been granted conscientious objector status by the Army.

But to mention the painfully obvious connection between all these incidents is considered Islamophobic. As my colleague and former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy described the Stockton/Lungren exchange:

This is criminal recklessness. It is idiocy beyond description, so I should just stop trying to describe it. Watch it in all its jaw-dropping ignominy. Three and a half minutes — although it will take you longer than that because you’ll need to watch it a few times in order to come to grips with the fact that it’s not a parody but the real thinking of top officials in the Defense Department and throughout the administration.

Read the entire Top 10, and also read The U.S. Govts Willful Ignorance (on Islam) Is Costing Soldiers’ Lives.


19 Responses

  1. PURE GARBAGE FROM THE OBUUUMMMAA CRAP MONGERS!!! LOCK AND LOAD.

  2. semantic head games..sheesh!!!

  3. It depends on what your definition of “There is a Jew hiding behind me. Come and kill him!” is.

  4. Obama has to go. When you can’t name what we are spending all of this money on, how can you fight it?

  5. Stockton is an idiot because not every act of violent Islamism is borne of AQ. The DHS recognizes more violent Islamic groups than that, as does the State Dept., and other US agencies. I won’t try to name them here, but AQ has only a philosophical relationship at best with most of them, with little formal contact.

    Obama and the Democrats have to realize that failing to name violent Islam does not protect peaceful or break-away Muslims who disavow fundamentalism. It makes people more afraid that Obama is asleep at the wheel and that the US is not safe as a result.

    • He is not asleep. He is directing mooselim traffic. The more heinous the group the more he protects it. He has decided to release the rabid Taliban dog now penned in Gitmo back to Afghanistan where he can do the most harm. If any Americans die as a result of a terrorist act thought up by this b_____d , we will have this usurper to thank. What a pity we can’t ship him and all his baggage to Kabul with him. Except for Bo he needs a good home with people who won’t regard him as unclean.

  6. I just watched this elsewhere. Stockton’s inability to answer a simple question is astounding. He comes across as a fool. He can’t answer a simple question!……who invited that guy????

  7. Not a fool…a politician!

  8. [...] attorney general of the state of California, on the source of the threat to America and its troops DOD official will not acknowledge radical Islamists as a threat Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]

  9. [...] attorney general of the state of California, on the source of the threat to America and its troops. Stockton repeatedly refuses to acknowledge radical Islamists as a threat. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]

  10. If you really want to hear the truth, I suggest you read Geert Wilders,
    my kind of politician, who is in the Dutch parliment.
    He straight out tells it like it is. He was even tried in Court for calling
    on Europe to beware of the Islamization of their countries. Can you believe that the the people Obama has around him are more inept
    than the ones Carter had???

  11. ALL ISLAM is “Radical”.

  12. O bama
    M ust
    G o

  13. Great post. Sad that he wouldn’t even identify the enemy.
    I posted to my blog as well. http://www.badmayo.com

    Thanks.

  14. [...] The U.S. Govts Willful Ignorance (on Islam) Is Costing Soldiers’ Lives. Posted on 2 Dec 12 by Creeping Sharia GA_googleAddAttr("AdOpt", "1"); GA_googleAddAttr("Origin", "other"); [...]

  15. [...] DOD official refuses to acknowledge the threat of radical Islam (video) [...]

  16. [...] people even our mild-mannered administration are willing to call “the enemy” – “al Qaeda and its allies around the world” – carried out a brilliant cognitive war op. Right up there in the global hit parade with 9/11 [...]

  17. [...] people even our mild-mannered administration are willing to call “the enemy” – “al Qaeda and its allies around the world” – carried out a brilliant cognitive war op. Right up there in the global hit parade with 9-11 [...]

  18. [...] people even our mild-mannered administration are willing to call “the enemy” – “al Qaeda and its allies around the world” – carried out a brilliant cognitive war op. Right up there in the global hit parade with 9/11 [...]

Your comments & your IP address are your legal problem, not ours.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 33,597 other followers

%d bloggers like this: