Muslims, Harvard shill for Islam, celebrate sharia law & its “desirable chilling effect” in US

via Muslim civil rights advocates celebrate major victory in Oklahoma court

Muslim civil rights activists in the United States are celebrating a major victory in an Oklahoma court. According to Noah Feldman, professor of law at Harvard University, the law would likely discourage similar legislation in at least 20 U.S. states over the past several years.

LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) – A federal appeals court this week agreed with a lower court that blocked an Oklahoma law that would have barred state courts from considering or using Shariah law, the Islamic code of conduct.

Feldman says that the decision “should have a good, positive, desirable chilling effect . It should tell people in those jurisdictions that (similar laws) almost all will be judged unconstitutional.”

The issue began in the November 2010 election, when Oklahomans voted in favor of referendum SQ 755 – described as “a preemptive strike against Sharia Law coming to Oklahoma.”

“The courts shall not look to the legal precepts of other nations or cultures. Specifically, the courts shall not consider international law or Sharia law,” the amendment read.

Sharia law always has a desirable, chilling effect on freedom. But thanks for clarifying your intentions. Feldman is vehemently pro-sharia, pro-Muslim Brotherhood and it’s a strain embedded in the Obama administration who likely watched closely, if not influenced, the Oklahoma situation from day one. As Christine Brim noted in Sharia Comes to the Supreme Court:

In December, 2006, Kagan hired Noah Feldman, architect of Iraq’s Constitution requiring Shariah, as a star faculty member at Harvard Law School.  On March 16, 2008, Feldman published his controversial article “Why Shariah” in the New York Times Magazine, which promoted “Islamists” –  the Muslim Brotherhood – as a progressive democratic party, and promoted Shariah as a model not just for Muslim-majority countries but for all: “In fact, for most of its history, Islamic law offered the most liberal and humane legal principles available anywhere in the world…”  The article was adapted from his book The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, which was published in late March, 2008.

On September 16, 2008, Kagan whole-heartedly endorsed Feldman’s promotion of the Muslim Brotherhood and Shariah by honoring him with the endowed Bemis Chair in International Law.  Feldman’s speech on receiving the award was revealing: he advocated for an international, “outward interpretation” of the Constitution that could “require the U.S. to confer rights on citizens of other nations,” and allow for an “experimental Constitution.”

As to the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamist worldwide political organization that Feldman and Kagan support? Their motto is as revealing as Feldman’s speech:

“Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”

Given that slogan, you could well ask if Feldman really meant the Muslim Brotherhood when he wrote about “Islamists” in the book Kagan so admired that she gave him an endowed chair.  And he anticipated that question; in the second footnote in his book he states, “Throughout this book, when I refer to Islamists or Islamism, I have in mind mainstream Sunni Muslim activists loosely aligned with the ideology of the transnational Muslim Brotherhood (MB)…the Brotherhood broadly embraces electoral politics, but without eschewing the use of violence in some circumstances, notably against those whom it defines as invaders in Iraq and Palestine.”



19 Responses

  1. Anybody pushing for Sharia Law in the United States needs to be put on trial for Sedition and Treason as it directly goes against the United States Constitution. Sharia Law takes away Freedom that is guaranteed to us under the Constitution, Plain and Simple. If you want to live under Sharia Law, go live in on of the Sharia Law countries.

    • STATE DEPT. HAS BEEN INVADED AND OCERTHROWN;NO LONGER AMERICAN;THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM HAS BEEN INVADED AND OVERTHROWN..NO LONGER AMERICAN…THE WHITE HOUSE AND EXECUTIVE BRANCH HAS BEEN INVADED AND OVERTHROWN……..THE MELDERS OF CULTURE HAVE DONE THIS;THE NEW MELTING POT…DON;T EAT FROM THIS POT;THE POISION WILL DO YOU IN………..THESE PEOPLE ARE THE ARSENIC OF THE WORLD.FILTER YOUR MIND FOOD;FILTER YOUR SPIRITUAL FOOD;FILTER YOUR PHYSICAL FOOD …FILTER YOUR AIR ALSO;CHEMTRAILS ARE FULL OF TOXINS……AND RADIATION.

  2. Looks like the COURTS WONT AGREE WITH THE CITIZENS WHO VOTE AGAINST SHERIA LAWS, then it will be up to the CITIZENS of each state to take the BULL BY THE HORNS and correct the situation by REMOVING ALL JUDGES who are for these THUGS wanting SHERIA LAW and destroy the CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE U S A. LOCK AND LOAD!!!

  3. [...] on 18 Jan 12 by Creeping Sharia Advertisement GA_googleAddAttr("AdOpt", "1"); GA_googleAddAttr("Origin", "other"); [...]

  4. In my opinion when judges and other officals make these insane decisions for islam they likely had the choice of family members being murdered or making many millions of dollars for the favorable decision.
    I suspect the blackrock group of companies have control of so much of the funds and stock markets that they can make obscure companies rise or fall hugely at will. Those willing to favor islam receive tips and for a few thousand in options they can secretly rake in millions. Yes it is treason

  5. As I’ve said all along–as long as our/your lawyers, politicians etc., give in to muslims, sharia will continue to GALLOP! Not creep, GALLOP. Get it right; muslims are barbaric, inbred rabble-true, but it’s really our own people who are letting it happen–and even helping!

  6. Let’s not let the Constitution get in the way of Democrat ideology through unconstitutional ideology at the court level. A judge does not make Constitutional law but is required to keep Constitutional law in his judgements. Shariah Law is not part of the US Constitution and therefore is invalid. It’s time for the American people to remove the Dem’s and Obama.

    A friend sent me a e-mail with two pictures in and asked the proverbial question about what is right and what is wrong. The first picture is thousands of Muslims praying in the streets of New York, which is quite illegal. However, the Mayor’s of New York since Guilliani’s time, the leftist media and Obama think this is okay. However, when Tim Tebow took a knee several times during the season in thanks to God the entire media criticized him for what he did.

    We don’t know what is wrong anymore is because some of us have lost sight of God and will fall for anything, especially politicians, academia and media.

  7. Peter76 is exactly right. If they persist, we’ll show them what a “chilling effect” looks like.

  8. Sharia law and the constitution can not work together. We can not have one set of laws for one area and another for another area. It will not work and should not work. OK making this decision I think was totally wrong and it should go further in the court system. It should make a statement but one that states no sharia law in America ever.

  9. Eastern Universities in both US and Canada seem to be real hotbeds of muslim ‘huggers’, and Harvard in particular. Uni’s should be places of learning and reason, yet here we have so-called ‘academics’ openly pushing an ideology which is totally opposed to that premise?! What on earth is wrong with these America-hating traitors; yes traitors! In fact the Universities actually seem to be the main bastion of sharia/islam in North America, and desperately need to be cleaned out; and you won’t get any help from the White House.

  10. A filthy court jooo!!(I am Jewish and totally revolted by this human perversion!!) A joo who is in love with izlam: live by the sword and die by it, scum!!

  11. And Kagan a pervert joo dyke!! What a pair of horrors, to think of the hatred that has propelled them so far!! No different to muzz-slimes!!

  12. The Left has lost its collective tiny little mind. Sharia specifically removes gains made by feminists and child advocates in US law in the last 100 years. If any liberal won’t admit it, they need to turn in their card for a “new fascist” one.

  13. The judge that deemed the Oklahoma law unconstitutional and that a court can look to sharia or foreign law in their courts, is actually in violation of Article VI of the Constitution which says that the US Constitution and states constitutions are the supreme law of the land and no foreign laws shall be considered. This renders that before the law everyone is equal and their individual rights and liberties are not infringed. Sharia law is not religious law but a system of government that regulates a persons total life; it is a system or idealogy of judgements and punishments. Under Sharia law non-Muslims are not equal, women are less than men and it is totalitarian -no freedom of speech, no freedom to choose, and no freedom to practice one’s religion except if they say you can or pay a tax.

    Again, this is not a 1st Amendment issue, but upholding Article VI of the Constitution. Get out your pocket Constitutions and read it.

  14. ISLAM IS ANTI AMERICAN AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL ON IT’S FACE.

  15. [...] Muslims, Harvard shill for Islam, celebrate sharia law & its “desirable chilling effect&#8… (creepingsharia.wordpress.com) [...]

  16. [...] Muslims, Harvard shill for Islam, celebrate sharia law & its “desirable chilling effect&#8… (creepingsharia.wordpress.com) [...]

Your comments & your IP address are your legal problem, not ours.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 37,993 other followers

%d bloggers like this: