WAPO sides with Islamist against human rights advocate

via Human rights advocate says Washington Post distorted her views on Islam :: Catholic News Agency (CNA).

Washington D.C., Jun 13, 2012 / 02:01 am (CNA).- Nina Shea, a prominent Catholic advocate for global religious freedom, says the Washington Post presented her as a “religious bigot” by falsely crediting her with an inflammatory statement on Islam.

Shea, a Hudson Institute senior fellow and commissioner of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, told CNA June12 that the Post’s religion writer Michelle Boorstein committed an “inexplicable journalistic lapse” with her use of a “fabricated” quotation.

While Boorstein noted some of Shea’s objections in an “update” to her story (“Federal lawsuit charges religious freedom commission with discriminating against Muslims,” June 11), she has refused to make a correction or withdraw the story, after being notified of the errors of both fact and attribution.

The inflammatory words were misattributed to Shea in a story about Safiya Ghori-Ahmad, government relations director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council. Ghori-Ahmad is suing the U.S. religious freedom commission, saying she suffered religious discrimination while employed as an analyst.

In her June 11 Washington Post report, Boorstein said that Ghori-Ahmad’s lawsuit quoted Shea as saying that “hiring a Muslim like Ms. Ghori-Ahmad to analyze religious freedom in Pakistan would be like ‘hiring an IRA activist to research the UK twenty years ago.’”

However, most of the quoted words – including the alleged warning about “hiring a Muslim like Ms. Ghori-Ahmad” – were never used by Shea, despite Boorstein’s assertion that the suit “quotes Shea as writing” them.

In fact, an examination of the legal complaint shows that the entire phrase – “hiring a Muslim like Ms. Ghori-Ahmad to analyze religious freedom in Pakistan would be like” – is Ghori-Ahmad’s own. The lawsuit does not attribute the phrase to Shea, as Boorstein’s story suggests.

Shea is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit, which has been brought against the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom as an organization.

Currently, Shea is in contact with representatives of the Washington Post, and says the paper “should print a correction of the serious factual error” that it published to an international audience online.

Although Shea notified Boorstein of the error on Monday, the Washington Post religion writer did not acknowledge or correct the factual error and misquotation. Instead, in an evening update to the story, Boorstein offered a general paraphrase of Shea’s objection to being “depicted as bigoted.”

Shea told CNA that by attributing the remark to her “the Washington Post blog has crossed a line.”

“This is a classic case of yellow journalism. The lawsuit does not quote me writing those words. Those were Ms. Ghori-Ahmad’s words in the complaint characterizing statements that she alleges I wrote.”

Boorstein’s article did acknowledge, and quote, Shea’s explanation of her actual grounds for opposing Ghori-Ahmad’s hiring. The former analyst’s writings, Shea said, “reflect … activism and bias, not scholarship, which would not serve us well on the research staff.”

Shea, whose 2011 book “Silenced” called attention to the persecution of various Muslim groups, said that her human rights work “has held up under scrutiny and has been taken seriously by the US State Department, Congress, think tanks, and a number of key Muslim figures.”

“It was in recognition of this role that the Ahmadiyya American Muslim Community honored me with its inaugural Humanitarian Award last July,” she noted, rejecting the Washington Post’s implication that she is biased against members of the religion.

Shea also noted that Boorstein “never asked for a comment” from her on the story about Ghori-Ahmad’s lawsuit, despite having “contacted me many times in the past.”

We told you about the sharia advocate whom Boorstein shills for back in this post, Terror-linked CAIR whines about Congressional commission’s ‘religious agenda’. Does being a Muslim and part of an Islamist group that promotes sharia qualify one to infiltrate do any of these self-described tasks?

Safiya regularly meets with the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, and the FBI in order to develop and implement policy recommendations that provide guidance to both the government and the Muslim American community on civil rights and counterterrorism issues. Safiya has also authored legal and policy memoranda, briefing papers and press releases on counterterrorism strategy, radicalization, immigration reform, human rights issues and U.S. domestic and international policy.

8 Responses

  1. “hiring a Muslim” would be inviting lawsuits from Eric Holder, paying for expensive trips to Mecca, plus adding in prayer rooms, giving 4 hours a day off paid for prayer, halal only cafeteria, and general death threats for trying to make them do work. And visits from CAIR to grind you out of business. They make more money in CAIR funded lawsuits then by working. Put it under its just stupid business hiring these.

  2. This post is genuinely a fastidious one it helps new net viewers, who are wishing in favor of
    blogging.

  3. OT http://news.yahoo.com/al-qaida-urges-egypt-cancel-treaty-israel-170634362.html of course they would, why is this news? oh I see the Associated with islam Press author, m. youssef

  4. This Boorstein sounds like a hack. The Washington Post has really fallen on hard times lately, resorting to manufacturing stories to get attention. It’s a shame. How the mighty have fallen.

  5. Reblogged this on News You May Have Missed and commented:
    WAPO sides with Islamist against human rights advocate

  6. wow a journolista did biased work to favor Muslims for a lefty rag in Wash DC?? were this the only instance of such blatant prejudice and lying in the MSM

  7. [...] just posted on previous WAPO siding with Islamists yesterday. They’re at it again via Atlas [...]

  8. [...] just posted on previous WAPO siding with Islamists yesterday. They’re at it again via Atlas [...]

Your comments & your IP address are your legal problem, not ours.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 38,011 other followers

%d bloggers like this: