Alabama: Judge says jihad case won’t be dismissed

via Judge refuses defense request to dismiss charges in Alabama terrorism case | al.com.

randy-wilsonjpg-6f4d8562dbf04348

MOBILE, Alabama – A federal judge has declined to throw out terrorism-related charges against a man accused of conspiring to wage violent jihad in a foreign country.

Dom Soto, an attorney for Randy “Rasheed” Wilson, had sought the dismissal of charges on grounds that the charges were unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. But U.S. District Judge Kristi DuBose ruled Tuesday that the charges are neither.

Federal prosecutors allege that Wilson, who was born in Mobile and spent time in Birmingham as an adolescent, struck up a friendship online with Mohammad Abdul Rahman Abukhdair and then planned to go to Africa and find a terrorist organization to join.

The issue, DuBose wrote, is whether the law adequately describes the outlawed conduct.

“Any ordinary person can understand that it is a crime to conspire to provide your own services, intending that your services be used to carry out a conspiracy to murder, maim or damage property in a foreign country,” the judge wrote. “This is what the government alleges happened in this case.”

Really? What about Muslims permitted by the State Dept. to aid the jihad in Syria? What about this guy?

DuBose wrote that Soto’s constitutional challenge essentially boils down to a disagreement over the evidence. The defense maintains that Wilson’s actions never amounted to more than constitutionally protected conduct, such as the right to free speech and the right to travel. Prosecutors cited secretly recorded conversations among Wilson, Abukhdair and an undercover agent in arguing that the defendant expressed a very real intent to commit violent acts.

“Clearly at this stage in the litigation, Wilson cannot challenge the sufficiency of the evidence,” DuBose wrote. “Thus, any challenge that his conduct fails to prove a conspiracy to provide himself to terrorist intending that his services be used to carry out a conspiracy to murder, maim or damage property in a foreign country is premature.”

Soto said he would study the law but added that he likely will not appeal DuBose’s ruling.

“We’ll just wait and see,” he said. “It’s early in the game.”

Soto said he is confident that once a jury hears his client’s recorded conversations in context, it will be evident that the prosecution’s interpretation is off the mark.

“I think it’s going to be a different ball of wax,” he said.

The case currently is scheduled for trial in August. But Soto said a delay is probable. He noted that investigators have turned over some 1,000 hours of recorded conversations that the defense must examine.

4 Responses

  1. Kudos for the judge. I hope he sticks to his guns.

  2. Great to hear a judge that is not confused by the law or by the need to protect US citizens here and abroad.

  3. But the mosque encouraged them. Don’t they get their day in court? See if he will turn states on them.

  4. eh! This is standard procedure in ANY case. The defense “always” asks for dismissal the very first time a case goes before a judge…PERIOD! Now, the D.A. “may” offer a resolution at the next meeting dependent on whether or not they feel they have a “case.”

    To even “post” something of this nature is ridiculous.

Your comments & your IP address are your legal problem, not ours.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35,127 other followers

%d bloggers like this: