NYC Subway Killer a Devout Muslim

You probably heard of this story and saw this photo, Suspect confesses in pushing death of Queens dad in Times Square subway station:

NY Post cover

The picture was snapped by New York Post freelance photographer R. Umar Abbasi — who chose to run toward the train firing his flash to warn the operator and caught the image.

We read multiple stories but it wasn’t until perusing Atlas Shrugs did we find this nugget via Huffington Post of all places.

Naeem Davis, 31, an immigrant from Sierra Leone, said during an interview at Rikers Island Friday morning that he had no intention of killing Han, a 58-year-old Queens dad who was crushed by a Q train at the 49th Street and Seventh Avenue station Monday.

“I didn’t mean to push him that hard,” said Davis, who wore a bright orange jumpsuit and had a scraggly black goatee, “I just wanted him to get away from me.

“God was testing me. I failed that test.”

After Han was struck by the train, Davis ran from the station, but turned himself in the next day once he knew police were searching for him.

Davis said he is a devout Muslim who usually visits a mosque daily. He said he regretted Han’s death.

 

Back to your regularly scheduled propaganda news.

Holy Islamville: a Muslim village in South Carolina

Founded by a militant Muslim.

Holy Islamville is a Muslim village in South Carolina, established by His Eminence, El-Sheikh Syed Mubarik Ali Shah Gilani, in 1983 as Islamville, SC. Upon the event of miraculous manifestations (Karamaat) of Allah Ta’ala, the Baitun-Noor Holy Khanqah (the very first Islamic shrine in America) was erected and the village renamed to Holy Islamville in the holy month of Ramadan al-Mubarak, 1423 AH (2002 AD).

Details via Family Security Matters.

A radical Pakistani cleric named Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani and his followers testify to the holiness of a shrine where miracles allegedly prove his supernatural powers. The shrine isn’t in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia or anywhere in the Islamic world. It’s in York County, South Carolina, inside a commune about 36 acres large called “Holy Islamville,” located on a street named Islamville Way.

It was founded in 1982 by a group called Muslims of the Americas (MOA), led by the aforementioned Gilani. The Department of Homeland Security says it is linked to Jamaat ul-Fuqra, a Pakistani militant group also led by Glani. The State Department describes ul-Fuqra as “an Islamic sect that seeks to purify Islam through violence.”

Fuqra was behind many assassinations and bombings between 1979 and the early 1990s. Its biggest plot aimed to kill 4,500 Indians in Toronto during the Festival of Lights in 1991. Its destructive capacity first caught the FBI’s attention in 1989 because of a raid on a storage locker in Colorado Springs. They discovered weapons and plans for various attacks, including a scheme to murder Imam Rashad Khalifa in Arizona in 1990. They succeeded, killing him exactly as the seized papers said they would. Two Fuqra members were allegedly involved in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and dramatic plots against New York City.

In October 1992, Fuqra’s 101-acre compound at Buena Vista, Colorado was shut down. The authorities discovered it was a full-blown terrorist training camp. The members financed their efforts through a web of fake companies and various criminal activities. A poem by Gilani was found that reads: “Come join my troops and army/Says our Sheikh Gilani/Prepare to sacrifice your head/A true believer is never dead/Say ‘Victory is in the Air’/The kafir’s blood will not be spared.” That’s the sheikh who the residents of Islamville and the other MOA compounds view as a representative of Allah that meets with Jesus in heaven, heals diseases, transforms into animals, instantly transports and leaves his body at will.

The MOA says it has 22 “villages” around the country, with its Islamberg headquarters in Hancock, New York being the most notorious. In a secret recruitment tape made by Gilani, he states the purpose of these villages: “We are establishing training camps.” He tells viewers that they “are most welcome to join one of the most advanced training courses in Islamic military warfare” by contacting the group’s offices in Pakistan or several locations in the U.S., including South Carolina. That’s Islamville.

The video then shows the type of training being offered: Hijacking vehicles, use of firearms, hijacking vehicles, setting off explosives, etc. Gilani makes it clear that he isn’t just focused on Kashmir. “We are fighting to destroy the enemy. We are dealing with evil at its roots and its roots are America,” he says. Excerpts from the tape were first released in a film titled Homegrown Jihad and later in The Third Jihad.

The tape was dismissed by some because of its old age and the fact that it was filmed in Pakistan. A law enforcement source later provided me with two more of the MOA’s films. The first showed women living at Islamberg in New York training in guerilla warfare, complete in military fatigue. The second is a propaganda tape where MOA leaders declare America a Muslim country and vow to defend it from foreign and domestic enemies. I gave the films to the Christian Action Network to release to the public.

More at link above.

Bonus below the fold:

Geert Wilders Trial To Restart After Biased Judges Dismissed

Can Wilders ever receive a fair trial when every media outlet that comments on him describes him in a biased, guilty manner?

(RTTNews) – An appeals panel at the Amsterdam District Court on Friday ordered judges in the hate speech trial of controversial anti-Muslim Dutch MP Geert Wilders to step down and ruled that the trial must be restarted with a new panel of judges.

Friday’s ruling follows Wilders’ demand that the present judges panel at Amsterdam District Court presiding over his trial be dismissed as they created “an impression of partiality” by their decision to reject a defense request to recall a witness.

Wilders’ lawyer Bram Moszkowicz had insisted at an earlier hearing that the court decision to reject the request for recalling the witness would “make it impossible for the defense to substantiate a crucial part of its case.”

In its ruling made Friday, the independent appeals panel said it found the trial judges’ decision to be “incomprehensible in the absence of any motivation,” and added that the fear of bias due to the judges’ decision result was “understandable”.

“Under the circumstances, the request (for the judges’ removal) is granted,” the panel said in a statement. “Another chamber will handle the rest of the case.”

The ruling implies that Wilders’ trial will now restart from scratch with a new panel of judges. The trial had opened on October 4 at the Amsterdam District Court after a lengthy legal process that began in January.

via Dutch MP’s Hate Speech Trial To Restart With New Judges.

Meanwhile, when will the Muslims who threaten and call for Wilders death ever appear in court?

Future of Western civilization at stake as Geert Wilders goes to court

From Forbes, Democracy on Trial: Geert Wilders Goes To Court:

It may well become the trial of the century: this week, Dutch MP Geert Wilders stands before the judge on charges of “sowing hate” through his speeches and writings about Islam.

But it is not Geert Wilders who really is on trial here: it is, rather, that sacred principle of free speech on which democracy and the Enlightenment are born.

This, of course, is what makes the Wilders case so ironic – and so tragic: in speaking out to defend the free democracy of the Netherlands from the incursion of oppressive, Islamist influences and attempts to exercise power, he has been silenced by the very government he is struggling to protect.

Go figure.

The trial has been repeatedly postponed since it first opened in Amsterdam last January, after an earlier high court ruling dismissing the charges was appealed in the lower Amsterdam courts.   For Wilders, however, its timing could not come at a more strategic moment. As the founder and leader of Holland’s far-right Freedom Party (PVV), Wilders is not only Holland’s most controversial politician, but also its most-favored, ranking higher in the polls now than it did after a sweeping victory in parliamentary elections this past June.  Moreover, just last week, after months of debate, the Dutch parliament finally settled on a new coalition government that will include support from the PVV under Wilders’ leadership.

The lawsuit itself centers around Wilders’ statements comparing of the Koran to Mein Kampf , as well as other anti-Islam remarks he has made in recent years. Also at issue is his film, “Fitna,” which includes newsreel footage of terrorist attacks perpetrated by Muslim extremists.  The charge – that he is inciting hate and has insulted Muslims – carries no small cost: if he loses, the 47-year-old Wilders could face a prison term of up to two years.

Yet the whole case bespeaks, in fact, the very viability of Wilders’ accusations; for not since the founding of the Third Reich have the principles of our democracy been so at risk as they have been during the nine years since 9/11, challenged at every turn by followers of Salafism and other strains of fundamentalist Islam – and by the West’s efforts at responding to radical Islam within its borders.  Hence the threats against cartoonists who draw images of Mohammed; hence the censorship of television shows and theater productions; hence the brutal murder of filmmaker and commentator Theo van Gogh by a Muslim extremist on the streets of Amsterdam, not far from the courthouse where Geert Wilders is being tried.  Now, it is speech itself we stand to lose. It is our ideas that may be stifled and suppressed.
And so it is not just Wilders whose future is as stake, but that of Western civilization, of the ideals which are our guiding light. Agree with Mr. Wilders’ views or not, one can only hope, then, that the judges whom he faces will uphold his right to speak them; and from the courthouse steps out onto the streets, across the canals of Amsterdam and beyond, that they will defy those who try to silence him, with the sound of freedom ringing.

PS: The author of the piece left a comment below, asking people to comment on the original piece at Forbes, please do so if you have a chance.

Murder, Mayhem & Self-Censorship: A Timeline

Following up on Fox News’ “awakening” on the submission to censorship of Islam in the media, of which Fox plays a major role, we thought it a good time to cite examples that clearly indicate this is not a new phenomenon.

This list is a supplement to a picture book entitled ‘Muhammad: The “Banned” Images.’ While it is likely incomplete, it is extensive. Read our interview with the book’s creator, read through and share the list below, and get yourself a copy of the book because at the current rate of submission to Islam and sharia law, the book will be illegal soon – unless Americans lead the way in vigilantly and vigorously defending the freedom’s of our birthright.

Murder, Mayhem & Self-Censorship

Muhammad: The “Banned” Images, which includes the Danish cartoons, 30 other images of Muhammad, and an essay calling for free speech unfettered by fear, appeared in print shortly after 2 men were arrested for planning to kill Flemming Rose, the editor who first published the cartoons. The book includes a brief survey of the reaction of Western intellectuals to Muslim violence and threats, from the Rushdie fatwa to Yale University Press’s recent spineless self-censorship of Klausen’s Cartoons that Shook the World. Muhammad: The “Banned” Images is available from Amazon.

The list below includes only news stories relating to images of Muhammad. If you know of other examples, tell us, citing a published news story, and we’ll add the example to the list. This list could easily be expanded – and eventually may be – to include suppression of painting, sculpture, and art for the sake of multiculturalism and the religious sensibilities. See, for example, the Christian and Sikh examples cited in the “Statement of Principle” in Muhammad: The “Banned” Images, pp. 47-48.

1955 – April: Eight-foot sculpture on the Appellate Division of the First Department of the New York State Supreme Court (at Madison Square Park), in place since ca. 1900, is identified during renovation as Muhammad, and removed after the Egyptian, Indonesian and Pakistani ambassadors to the United Nations protest its presence. See Muhammad: The “Banned” Images p. 13.

1988 – September 26: Publication of Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses

1988 – October (early): Satanic Verses banned in India

1989 – January 14: Satanic Verses publicly burned by Muslims in Bradford, England

1989 – February 14: Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issues fatwa against Salman Rushdie

1989 – March 1: Cody’s Books and a branch of Waldenbooks in Berkeley, CA, are firebombed after their managers assert that they will continue to sell Satanic Verse

1989 – April: Collets and Dillons in London are firebombed for stocking Satanic Verses; bombs also at High Wycombe, on London’s King’s Road, in the Liberty department store, and the York Penguin bookshop. Unexploded devices discovered at Nottingham, Guildford, and Peterborough

1989 – August 3: Unidentified 21-year-old Lebanese man dies priming a book bomb he intended to use to kill Rushdie

1991 – July 3: Ettore Capriolo, the Italian translator of the Satanic Verses, is beaten and stabbed in Milan, after death threats by Muslims

1991 – July 12: Hitoshi Igarashi, professor of comparative culture and Japanese translator of the Satanic Verses, is stabbed to death at Tsukuba University, near Tokyo

1993 – July 2: Attack targeting Aziz Nesin, a translator of the Satanic Verse, kills 37 Alewi intellectuals at the Madimak Hotel in Sivas, Turkey

1993 – October 12: William Nygaard, publisher of the Satanic Verses in Norway, is shot and injured

1997 – Council on Inter-American Relations (CAIR) objects to the figure of Muhammad in Adolf Weinman’s frieze of lawmakers in the Supreme Court, Washington, D.C. Chief Justice Rehnquist replies that it is unlawful to remove or injure any architectural feature of the Supreme Court, but that the Supreme Court will change its tourist literature to be more sensitive to Muslim religious beliefs. (See Muhammad: The “Banned” Images, p. 13 and no. 28.)

Dutch court rejects 15 of Geert Wilders’ 18 witnesses

The outcome of this disastrous,  faux trial against freedom of speech and expression is becoming easier, and easier to predict. Follow the case on Geert Wilders new website at Wilders on Trial, also added to our blogroll on left.

via Court rejects Wilders’ extremist witnesses.

Mohammed Bouyeri and other Muslim extremists will not be allowed to testify in the case against Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders, an Amsterdam court has ruled.

Mr Wilders had called a total of 18 witnesses, 15 of whom have been rejected by the court. He wanted to put Islamic extremists in the witness box to illustrate what he sees as the danger of Islam, and justify his criticism of the religion. However, the court accepted only the three Islam experts [Hans Jansen,  Simon Admiraal, Wafa Sultan - and they will have to testify in private] whom Mr Wilders had called, rejecting all the lawyers and Islamic extremists.

Mohammed Bouyeri is convicted of murdering filmmaker Theo van Gogh In 2004. He shot the outspoken Islam critic in the street and cut his throat.

The court also rejected a plea by the politician’s defence that the case should be transferred to the Supreme Court, because Mr Wilders is an MP.

More from Radio Netherlands Worldwide:

They have also ruled that other ‘Muslim extremists’ on Mr Wilders’ ‘wishlist’ will not be allowed to testify. The list includes Fawaz Jneid, imam at the Soennah Mosque in The Hague, and Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, chairman of the Guardian Council in Iran.

…two ex-Muslims called by his defence team – in part to give their personal view about the impact of Islam – were also rejected.

Reacting to the rulings later, Mr Wilders told journalists outside the courtroom, “This court doesn’t seem to be interested in the truth. I can only conclude that the court is not going to let me have a fair trial. I have no respect for this.”

Also check Gates of Vienna for video from the courtroom.

Geert Wilders’ speech to the court; trial to resume in February

They came for Geert Wilders. Who will they come for next? Whatcha’ gonna do when they come for you?

Above, Kurt Westergaard’s drawing of Geert Wilders – now added to our homepage in support of Wilders and the freedoms of speech and expression, and against those who wish to force their intolerant ideologies on the world and suppress such freedoms.

From DutchNews.nl:

The trial of MP Geert Wilders on inciting hatred and discrimination charges will resume on February 3, judges in Amsterdam said on Wednesday.

Following yesterday’s initial hearing, judges will now decide who will be called as witnesses and on other procedural motions from both the prosecution and defence.

Wilders’ ended Wednesday’s session by stating that his defence rested not only on freedom of expression laws but the fact he is telling the truth. ‘Something that is true can’t be a criminal offence,’ he was quoted by Nos tv as saying. ‘This is why I ask [the court] to allow my expert witnesses to give testimony. I have to be able to defend myself. I have to be able to show I have spoken the truth.’

Wilders’ witness list includes university professors, radical imams and Mohammed Bouyeri, the man who murdered film maker Theo van Gogh.

Earlier, public prosecutor Birgit van Roessel told the court Wilders’ own testimony will take so long to be heard that he should be first questioned in private by an investigating judge.

Initial extensive questioning about all Wilders’ statements would place ‘a major burden’ on the court, she said. In addition, the hearing will take place in front of a large audience who may react to his statements, she said. So it must be asked if the hearing can take place ‘in the desired order and calm’, she told the court.

The prosecution is not planning to bring any witnesses to the trial, she said.

Yesterday in a pre-trial hearing, Geert Wilders made this statement, from the Geert Wilders weblog (also on our Int’l Blogroll):

Mister Speaker, judges of the court,

I would like to make use of my right to speak for a few minutes.

Freedom is the most precious of all our attainments and the most vulnerable. People have devoted their lives to it and given their lives for it. Our freedom in this country is the outcome of centuries. It is the consequence of a history that knows no equal and has brought us to where we are now.

I believe with all my heart and soul that the freedom in the Netherlands is threatened. That what our heritage is, what generations could only dream about, that this freedom is no longer a given, no longer self-evident.

I devote my life to the defence of our freedom. I know what the risks are and I pay a price for it every day. I do not complain about it; it is my own decision. I see that as my duty and it is why I am standing here.

Journalist infiltrates Geert Wilders inner circle, boasts she could have killed him

Her mission was to expose how “dangerous” Wilders political party is, and her message to those, like her, who oppose Geert Wilders is his security is weak and she could have killed him. Numerous times. So who will take the first shot based on her undercover intel? From NRC.nl:

An undercover Dutch journalist spent four months working for Geert Wilder’s populist PVV party. She was given unchecked access to the right-wing politician, a frequent recipient of death threats.

“I could have killed him,” were the first words of Karen Geurtsen’s article published in the magazine HP-De Tijd on Thursday. Posing as an intern, Geurtsen spent four months undercover, working with Geert Wilders and his anti-immigration party, PVV.

The breach of security is particularly painful since Wilders, a politician with controversial views on Islam, has been under permanent government protection since the assassination of film-maker Theo van Gogh. Wilders is constantly escorted by a private security detail and lives in a specially prepared safe house.

According to Geurtsen, she had “dozens” of opportunities to take the life of the best protected Dutch politician. As a party staff member she was allowed unchecked access to the PVV’s offices.

The National Coordinator for Fighting Terrorism (NCTb) is responsible for Wilder’s security. A spokesperson for the NCTb had no comment when asked whether his agency should have prevented the journalist from gaining access to the PVV’s leader. “Generally speaking,” he said, “security agencies only screen people in key positions of trust. That description does not cover staff members of political parties.” Scrutinising prospective employees is primarily the responsibility of the employing organisation, he added.

According to Karen Geurtsen, it would not have been hard to discover she was a journalist. “I am listed as a contributor to HP/De Tijd in its masthead,” she said. “It also easy to find evidence of my occupation as a journalist online.”

In a Twitter message, Geert Wilders called the undercover infiltration of his party “disgusting” and “a new low for leftist media”.

Geert Wilders receives summons: a sledgehammer blow to the freedom of speech

From Wilders’ site, the title says it all, but Wilders is not rolling over.

The 20th of January 2010 will be a crucial day for defending our freedom. This is the day when the political trial against Geert Wilders will start. Yesterday, Geert Wilders was summoned by the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) on behalf of the Court of Justice of Amsterdam. The indictment reads: group insult of Muslims, incitement to hatred and discrimination against Muslims due to their religion and incitement to hatred and discrimination against non-western immigrants and / or Moroccans due to their race.

Geert Wilders: “On the 20th of January 2010, a political trial will start. I am being prosecuted for my political convictions. The freedom of speech is on the verge of collapsing. If a politician is not allowed to criticise an ideology anymore, this means that we are lost, and it will lead to the end of our freedom. However I remain combative: I am convinced that I will be acquitted.”

In earlier stages, the PPS did not see any reason to prosecute Mr. Wilders.

Bram Moszkowicz, the lawyer on the case at hand, will submit a notice of objection to the summons on the point of group insult on behalf of Geert Wilders. Earlier this year, the Supreme Court of the Netherlands ruled that even though it is indeed punishable to insult a group of people, it is not punishable to insult a religion as such. Due to this the order of the Court of Amsterdam on this point is deemed incorrect.

Read the Summons against Wilders. Previous Wilders speeches here (video), his Speech to America here, the speech he would have given to the House of Lords had he not been banned from the UK here, and a two-part video of a speech again warning America (which was scheduled to take place at a Florida Marriot but was canceled due to Islamist pressure resulting in a lawsuit).

Wilders’ Freedom Party will seek minaret ban in Netherlands

Creeping anti-dhimmitude?

Amsterdam – The rightist Freedom Party PVV said Monday it would ask the Dutch government to hold a referendum on banning the construction of minarets, following a similar vote in Switzerland. On Sunday, a large majority of Swiss voters cast ballots in favour of banning construction of the slender towers attached to mosques, despite opposition to such a move by the government.

“We will call upon the government to make a similar referendum possible in the Netherlands,” PVV leader Geert Wilders told Dutch daily Volkskrant.

Congratulating Switzerland on what he called the “great result of the minaret referendum,” Wilders said: “If the government is unwilling to hold a referendum, the PVV will present its own bill to parliament. What is possible in Switzerland should also be possible here.”

The PVV, known for its criticism on Islam and migrants, currently holds nine seats in the 150-member legislature. Opinion polls show that if elections were held today, the party would win 27 seats, making it the second largest after the Christian Democrats on 35 seats.

via Weblog Geertwilders – Dutch Freedom Party wants minaret ban in Netherlands.

Muslims silence those who know too much about Islam (updated)

More and more frequently, Islamists and the useful idiots who help usher in, if not enforce, sharia are silencing those who have studied Islamic history, understand the requirement of jihad in Islam, and some who’ve lived as Muslims under sharia and have chosen to alert others to the threat posed to Western ideals of freedom.

Muslims, frequently the Muslim Student Association (MSA) on college campuses and CAIR elsewhere, simply enforce sharia the only way they know how, by force. Forcing any attempt to discuss, critique or expose Islamic sharia law and jihad to be unheard. Some recent examples:

Geert Wilders: canceled at the Marriot in Florida, at Loews in Tennessee, disrupted at Temple University, banned from UK, banned to appear in Czech parliament; (added) how could we forget Network Solutions despicable act of preemptively shutting down the Fitna movie website before the movie had even been seen or released

Nonie Darwish: disrupted at Seattle University (we were told to remove our report of this event), prevented from speaking at Princeton and Columbia, harassed at Purdue (video)

Robert Spencer, Jihad Watch: uninvited from American Library Association discussion on Islam free speech after CAIR spreads hysteria to panelists; Spencer attacked at NYU debate

Douglas Murray: sharia law debate shut down by jihadists at Conway Hall in UK; (added) banned from speaking about Islam at the London School of Economics

Ehud Olmert, former Israeli PM: disrupted at the University of Chicago, video here and here

David Horowitz: prevented from speaking at St. Louis University

Michael Savage: banned from UK for his opinion on Islam

Rifqa Bary: held without access to phone, internet or visitation rights (i.e., jailed) for converting to Christianity and reporting fear of becoming a victim of honor killing

This list is a sampling in 2009. There are many more, and then there are the books that are going unpublished due to fears of Islamic violence. Stephen Norwood described the rash of censorship this way in a NY Daily News piece titled, ‘Shades of 1938: Colleges quiet a critic of Islam‘:

Those who do not understand this history – and the shameful way our institutions of higher learning welcomed Nazis, while turning away many of their strongest opponents – are doomed to repeat it with respect to the radical Islamist threat today.

It is chilling that prominent American universities in our day and age provide platforms for virulently anti-Semitic speakers like Iran’s leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a Holocaust denier who threatens to wipe Israel off the map, while they shut down lectures by opponents of Islamic jihadists.

Meanwhile, Muslim student groups shut down and disrupt any and all critics of Islamic jihad and sharia on campus, they continue pushing the Muslim Brotherhood’s kind of grand jihad by inviting pro-jihad imams and terrorists to speak on campuses across the United States. At USC, Muslim students cried foul when the university forced them to remove verses from an online Qur’an that called for killing the Jews. There is also a steady stream of dhimmitude flowing from college newspapers defending terrorists and denouncing those who dare equate, rightfully, jihad and Islam.

As Nonie Darwish was planning to say at her canceled Princeton speech:

“…No religion or ideology can be beyond questioning when human rights are at stake. Religious or secular, we all must question obstacles to freedom and peace. The rights of any one religion must never supersede human rights or the rights of other religions to flourish. Tolerating intolerance is not a virtue; it is gross negligence.”

By stifling free speech, shaming speakers of the truth and calling them names, we allow tyranny to win. Fear tactics has worked for centuries in the Muslim world; now it is spreading like cancer in U.S. institutions of higher learning.

Updates: Some examples added above, and an incomplete list of books silenced by Muslims (thanks to commenters below):

The Cartoons That Shook the World: Yale Univ Press Bans Images of Muhammad in Book about Images of Muhammad

Muslim Women and the Challenge of Islamic Extremism: banned in Malaysia

My friend the Fanatic: Travels with an Indonesian Islamist: banned in Malaysia

Hamas:  American author Matthew Levitt and his publisher Yale Press sued by KinderUSA – described as a charitable front for terror financing

Funding Evil: Rachel Ehrenfeld, author of the book, sued for defamation by now dead serial libel tourist

To Whom Honor is Due: German publisher killed book about honor killing fearing Muslim backlash

Jewel of Medina: Canceled by Random House

* Also see the excellent supplement to ‘Muhammad The “Banned” Images’, a PDF file, titled “Murder, Mayhem & Self-Censorship A timeline of reactions to images and descriptions of Muhammad.” It covers censorship from Rushdie’s Satanic Verses onward.