Florida: Imam Chants “Allah Akbar” During 9/11 Memorial

via Imam Chants “Allah Akbar” During 9/11 Memorial At Catholic University In Florida – Shark Tank. by: Javier Manjarres

Considered to be one of the largest Catholic universities in the United States, Barry University, which is nestled in Miami Shores, Florida, hosted an interfaith memorial service to remember the victims of  the 9/11 terror attacks.

According to Laura Loomer, a senior at the university, the service began with Imam Nasir Ahmad, leader of Liberty City’s Mosque Masjid Al Ansar in Miami-Dade County, repeatedly chanting the ominous phrase “Allah Akbar” during his 10-15 minute address.

The phrase Allah Akbar is arabic for “Allah is greatest.”

Loomer said that she, as well as other students and other members of the community, were offended by Ahmad’s use of the phrase during the service, and felt ” insulted that on a day like 9/11 they would allow for a man of Muslim faith to open the service and chant Allah Akbar, the words that suicide bombers and terrorists chant before blowing themselves up.”

Loomer also discussed her concern with two political science professors at Barry University who agreed that her concern was valid.

Those were the last words that many of the 9/11 victims heard before terrorists flew the planes into the Twin Towers, Pentagon, and the field in PA. I know that not all Muslims are extremists, and I’m not promoting hate, but people need to understand that after 9/11, the words Allah Akbar have a negative connotation in the minds of many in the U.S., and on 9/11 people are very sensitive to this topic.

The way the service was organized was blatantly disrespectful to all Americans as well as the victims of terrorism on 9/11. Words can’t even describe how infuriated I am that this happened at my University. I understand the importance of religious tolerance, but on a day of remembrance that is still so raw to people in this country, this was a very embarrassing and disrespectful way to honor the victims who died at the hands of Islamic extremists who exploited the words “Allah Akbar,” especially since the Muslim prayer preceded the Christian and Jewish prayers that were read at the service.

There is a time and place for everything, and I don’t think it is appropriate for someone to be chanting Allah Akbar at a 9/11 memorial service, especially when that person who chanted it is a Muslim religious leader who was invited by Barry University to come and chant.-Laura Loomer

Is chanting “Allah Akbar!” at a 9/11 memorial service any different and equally offensive as a American Christian cleric singing “Proud to be an American” at a memorial service in Japan honoring those who died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
The answer is ‘no.’

While Muslim organizations like the Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR), which have been linked to Islamic fundamentalism, will defend the jihadi “battle cry” as just a simple acknowledgment of their god.

The phrase “Allah Akbar!” has a far different significance to Americans, and to the scores of others around the world, who grieve the loss of a loved one that was killed by some Islamic terrorist who cried out Allah Akbar before, during, or after he has carried out his or her cowardly act of terror.

There are countless videos and reports circulating around the world detailing numerous acts of terror by jihadists crying out “Allah Akbar!” as they commit their crimes of beheadings and mass executions.

The two Islamic terrorists who killed a British soldier killed on the streets of London, also cried out “”Allah Akbar!”

After the Towers fell on 9/11, jubilant Palestinians and other Muslims worldwide celebrated by chanting “Allah is greatest” over and over.
The actual Islamic terrorist who carried out the 9/11 attacks were heard screaming “Allah Akbar!” during the hijacking of the plane, and then most recently, U.S. Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, also cried out “Allah Akbar!” before opening fire and killing 13 soldiers at the Fort Hood Army base.

While the case can be made that “Allah Akbar!” is more of a battle cry than anything pro-Islamic groups or leaders would want to have you believe.

Loomer says the prophet Mohammed meant for it to be a “war call,”citing Bukhar Sahih Hadith 5.516, which states that “When Allah’s Apostle fought or raided people we raised our voices saying, ‘Allahu-Akbar! Allahu-Akbar! None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.”

Islamic apologists will bend over backyards to distance Islam from terrorism, but the actions of Islamic militants who cry “Allah Akbar!” as the carry out these acts of terror, make it impossible for anyone to believe that Islam is not inextricably tied to terrorism.


Elsewhere on the 13th anniversary of 9/11:

University of Wyoming paper publishes 9/11 editorial, claims USA needs to ‘get over’ terrorist attacks

South Carolina school yanks U.S. flag from student’s vehicles on 9/11

Feds Find Anti-Israel and Pro-Palestine 9/11 Message to America on Border Fence

Obama & FLOTUS spent 9/11 packing backpacks with a group called KABOOM!

Minnesota: Muslim Group Pushes for Taxpayer-funded Sharia-Compliant Food Bank

Islamic beggars can’t be choosers. But they are. Demanding free food that meets sharia standards. via Somali Group Pushes For Non-Pork Food Shelf « CBS Minnesota.

4743745_G

MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) — Food shelves can be a life line for people dealing with poverty and hunger.

But many in the Somali-American community say finding a food shelf that caters to their religious dietary restrictions is almost impossible.

“Some food shelves are trying to meet the need, but some of them already got canned beans that have already been mixed with pork — and there is a literacy issue here,” said community activist Fartun Weli.

A group of first-generation Somali Americans says they need help in developing a food shelf that specializes in healthy foods that do not contain pork or pork byproducts.

“It’s about human rights also, basic human rights to get the proper food and also healthy food,” said Imam Hassan Mohamud.

With signs in hand, they marched to the Hennepin County commissioners’ office to ask Peter McLaughlin for help. Most live in his district and feel he can help them help themselves.

McLaughlin and the group disagree over the availability of halal or kosher food at food shelves in Minnesota.

He did say they would need to petition all county commissioners for the money to make this food shelf a reality.

“The place to deal with this is going to be within the budget … our budget for next year,” McLaughlin said.

To get the food shelf up and running will cost $150,000, but McLaughlin says there is no plan on how much would be needed to sustain it.

The group hopes to present a proposal to the county commissioners during its budget meeting on Nov 13.

We suspect that the numbers of Somali’s easily trumps the numbers of Iraqi imports who are unemployed, refuse to integrate into American society and simply live of the tax dollars stolen from working Americans. And we know Somali Muslims are prime candidates for waging jihad.

 In a previous Taxation for Islamization installment, we told you the massive government waste Farm Bill included amendment ensuring halal food for poor Muslims (and kosher for Jews).

 

West Virginia: Democratic Field Organizer & Congressional Staffer Poses as Jihadist

via WZ.

In addition to being a Field Organizer for the West Virginia Democratic Party, Collin Peterson is also a staffer for Rep. Nick Rahall, D-West Virginia.

BNI had some more screen shots of the pro-Hamas Democratic staffer:

BxqCuE-IYAAVp78@RepNickRahall on Twitter.

Michigan: Muslim doctor who prescribed unnecessary chemo, pleads guilty in $91M Medicare fraud

That’s a lot more than the $35M previously reported. via Michigan Patch. h/t Dee

In a surprise move, Oakland County oncologist Dr. Farid Fata has pleaded guilty to charges in a scheme to bilk Medicare out at least $91 million by prescribing unnecessary treatments and in some cases telling patients who weren’t sick that they had cancer

“It is my choice,” Fata said of his decision to plead guilty. “I knew that the infusions … were medically unnecessary.”

The Detroit Free Press, The Detroit News and other area media are reporting that Fata, 49, pleased guilty to health care fraud, money laundering and conspiracy to give and get kickbacks – 16 counts in all.

When Fata is sentenced on Feb. 23, 2015, he could face up to 175 years in prison and a $250,000 fine on the health-care fraud counts, and a $500,000 fine for money laundering. U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade said she will seek a life sentence for what she called the most egregious case of health-care fraud she’s ever seen.5418c9153f2ad

“We have seen health care fraud before … but this one really is unique in that he exploited patients,” McQuade said.

» Read the criminal complaint against Dr. Farid Fata.

Fata’s plea comes on the first day of a hearing on motions filed in the trial that was to have begun next month. Fata still has to answer six remaining counts of health-care fraud in a trial scheduled for March 16.

Whistleblower Angela Swantek, a Royal Oak chemotherapy nurse who became suspicious of some of the practices in Fata’s clinic in a 2010 interview and reported him to state health officials, told the Free Press she wasn’t surprised that Fata pleaded guilty to the charges.

“I wondered how his team was going to defend him,” she said. “The charts don’t lie.”

Survivors of two of Fata’s patients told The Detroit News they’re disappointed that that the full story won’t be told in court. Liz Lupo, whose mother died of lung cancer in 2007, and Cynthia Burt, whose sister died in 2011, think Fata’s treatments were responsible for their loved ones’ deaths.

“He’s not being charged with enough,” Lupo said. “He pled guilty to a handful of patients when there were thousands. We wanted to hear the details about how he was allowed to (do this).”

But said she’s glad Fata accepted responsibility and hopes he’ll pay for his crimes with life in prison, but she said the plea deal cheats “the patients and family members (who) are not going to get the answers they seek.”

Vancouver: Iranian rape jihadist guilty of exploiting minors, including 14-year-old girl

he forced to have sex five times a day | National Post.

Two prosecutors emerged from B.C. Supreme Court Monday morning. Both women smiled, but more telling was the relief in their eyes, set in their voices.

After years of investigations and a trial that began 12 months ago, Reza Moazami, an Iranian-Canadian pimp, was found guilty of exploiting, coercing and assaulting almost a dozen young women, most of them minors, all of them abused.

He was convicted of 30 of 36 prostitution-related counts.

One of his victims, an Afghan immigrant, started working for Moazami when she was 14 years old. When police eventually found her, she was dressed in blue lingerie, waiting for her next “date.” Another girl, also recruited at 14, was forced to sell herself about five times a day.

Most of the crimes happened in downtown Vancouver, all occurred between February 2009 and October 2011.

Moazami housed the victims, dolled them up, gave them nicknames — Tokyo, Jenna — and offered them to men. Sometimes he delivered them in pairs to hotel suite bachelor parties, in one case to a B.C. Lions football player.

He pimped girls and young women from rented high-end Vancouver condominiums and hotels in B.C.’s lower mainland, Calgary, Edmonton, and Montreal. Over two months in 2009, one victim worked from his mother’s home.

Moazami constantly threatened the girls. He gave them drugs: Cocaine, oxycodone, Ecstasy and the date rape drug, GHB. If they didn’t do as they were told, he would threaten to punish Gucci, a small dog he had bought.

The judge relied on police evidence, testimony from Moazami’s victims — generally credible witnesses, she decided — and texts and Facebook messages he sent the girls.

“U f—ing crackhead,” reads a Facebook message to a victim he recruited at age 12. He had just assaulted her with bear spray. “U just good for selling ur ass that’s what youll always be hahaha go and die you nasty bitch just wait I’iget you and then ull be begging for mercy how did the bear mace treat you hahahahaha!!!”

The courts haven’t finished with him yet. He is to be tried next year for obstruction of justice. This is for attempts he allegedly made from jail, to have a girl recant her statement to police.

And he’ll be back in front of Justice Bruce in another three months, for sentencing on his 30 convictions; three of them — one human trafficking, two living off the avails of a minor through coercion — require mandatory five-year sentences.

“We’ll be seeking a significant amount of [prison] time,” Crown prosecutor Kristin Bryson said after the verdict had been read.

She praised the complainants for coming forward and having the guts to confront their abuser in open court.

It was a victory, but no one felt like celebrating. The reasons for judgment contained details that were too sordid, too disturbing. They were enough to make any reasonable person sick.

Besides, taking one criminal like Moazami off the street “really isn’t enough,” said Damienne Darby, the other prosecutor. “Especially if we’re not doing enough to support the victims.”

Are we?

No, she said. We aren’t.

 

Victory Against Civilization Jihad: Muslim Forced to Dismiss Frivolous “Defamation” Lawsuit

The rare victory in the counter-jihad via Victory Against Civilization Jihad: AFLC Forces Muslim to Dismiss Frivolous “Defamation” Lawsuit | American Freedom Law Center.

A former “Multicultural Relations” officer at the Ohio Department of Homeland Security (OHS), who was terminated for falsifying his background and for lying about being fired from an earlier teaching position at a community college for improper sexual relations with a female student, filed a notice today in Ohio state court dismissing his “defamation” lawsuit filed against several national security experts.  In the lawsuit, Omar Alomari claimed that counter-terrorism experts Stephen Coughlin, John Guandolo, Patrick Poole, and Todd Sheets had defamed him by exposing his role as a former high-ranking official in the Jordanian government and his ties to terrorist organizations.  The American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) represents the counter-terrorism experts in this litigation.

Alomari, a Muslim who emigrated from Jordan in 1978, claimed that the experts cast him in a “false light” by publishing false statements about him and, as a result of these statements, the OHS fired him.  Just recently, however, a federal court determined that the OHS terminated Alomari because he lied about his prior relationships to undisclosed organizations on his OHS application for employment, and he also lied about the fact that he lost his teaching position at Columbus State Community College as a result of an inappropriate sexual relationship with one of his female students.

In Alomari’s lawsuit, he alleged that counter-terrorism experts Stephen Coughlin, John Guandolo, and Todd Sheets had defamed him during counter-terrorism workshops and training sessions conducted for the Columbus, Ohio, police department by exposing Alomari’s nefarious ties to terrorists.  Alomari also alleged that Patrick Poole had published articles linking him to terrorists.

Alomari’s notice of dismissal came in response to a letter sent on behalf of the experts by AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel David Yerushalmi.  In his letter, Yerushalmi accused Alomari and his attorney of filing meritless and frivolous claims, and he gave them an ultimatum: either dismiss the frivolous claims by today or face a motion for sanctions.  Alomari chose the former, and his dismissal is with prejudice, ending this long-running litigation.

Yerushalmi commented:

“Alomari filed his original lawsuit in April 2013.  After we filed a motion to dismiss, rather than respond to our motion and defend his lawsuit, Alomari voluntarily dismissed his complaint without prejudice.  Under Ohio’s rules, this meant he could refile the lawsuit within a year.  Not surprisingly, he waited almost a year to the day and refiled essentially the same complaint.  This is classic Muslim Brotherhood lawfare doctrine: use and abuse the legal system to frighten anyone who might stand up to the Muslim Brotherhood and its ongoing effort to insinuate operatives into sensitive government positions.”

Robert Muise, also Co-Founder and Senior Counsel of AFLC, noted that this second voluntary dismissal is, by the court’s rules, with prejudice and finally brings this litigation to an end, remarking:

“AFLC is the only public-interest law firm that focuses on representing counter-terrorism experts and others pro bono who are threatened with litigation by the many Muslim Brotherhood front groups operating in this country under the guise of Muslim civic organizations.  AFLC has demonstrated time and again that when you confront Islamist lawfare with better and even more aggressive lawyering, the truth and the Constitution win out.  We want the counter-terrorism experts outside the government and those whistleblowers working for the government to know that AFLC is ready, willing, and able to defend their legal rights.  The time has come for patriotic Americans to stand up against the jihadist threat abroad and right here at home.”

 


Back posts here.

Obama Treasury Won’t Certify Boston Bombings an ‘Act of Terrorism’

Why? The jihad wasn’t big enough. via US Treasury: Boston Marathon Bombings Were Not ‘Act of Terrorism’ – Boston.com.

The Boston Marathon bombing attacks have not been certified as an “act of terrorism” by the US Treasury, an important point holding up some insurance payments.

In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, Congress passed the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, which created federally-backed insurance in cases of damage due to terrorism. Some Boston businesses were among those that bought the insurance.

Those purchases became relevant after the Boston Marathon bombings on April 15, 2013. Of the 160 companies located near the marathon’s finish line that submitted insurance claims, just 14 percent had purchased terrorism insurance, Insurance Journal reported.

But as of March 2014, many of those that held terrorism insurance had their claims denied. Why? The Secretary of the Treasury Jack Lew has not certified the attacks as an act of terrorism for these insurance purposes, a requirement under the wording of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

“The Secretary has not determined that there has been an ‘act of terrorism’ under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act,” a Treasury spokesperson emailed on Thursday.

Part of the reason for that ruling has to do with the amount of monetary damage done by the bombing. Under the federal law’s wording, a destructive act cannot be certified as terrorism if insurance losses total less than $5 million in aggregate. As of March, the state’s largest property and casualty insurers had issued $1.9 million in bomb-related insurance claims, The Boston Globe reported, well below the required $5 million amount. In addition, compensation is not paid out unless the aggregate losses total more than $100 million, according to the statute.

Still, the lack of a payoff hasn’t stopped Bostonians from buying the terrorism insurance since the bombings. As Boston-based brokerage firm William Gallagher Associates told Insurance Journal, about 80 percent of small and midsized customers own terrorism coverage, a jump from 50 percent before the marathon bombings.

Since the marathon wasn’t really a workplace, maybe they’ll classify this as a roadside hazard.

Regardless, another contribution by Muslims in America: terrorism insurance.

Shutting the city down under armed martial law and violating the rights of citizens surely cost more than $5M.

h/t Moonbattery who reminds everyone:

ISIS wannabe Nidal Hasan’s shooting spree at Fort Hood was workplace violence, not Islamic terror. Now it appears that the Boston Marathon bombing wasn’t terror either…

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36,880 other followers

%d bloggers like this: