CAIR tries to sabotage another law enforcement training program – this time in Florida

CAIR must have full-time staff across the U.S. searching for and attempting to stop all law enforcement efforts to detect jihadists and prevent terrorism. We had the NYPD, SSI training in Washington, and now SSI in Florida. Seven years after 9/11 who’s made more progress?

CAIR tries to sabotage Law Enforcement training program. This time in Sarasota, Florida.

The Council for American Islamic Relations has been trying in vain to stop a counter terrorism program in Sarasota, Florida, aimed at providing first responders with information on subjects such as building safety, suicide terrorism, technologies against terrorism and more. This is part of CAIR’s program to stop Security Solutions International (SSI) – an organization that has trained more than 500 Federal, State and Local agencies since 2004. According to the Seattle Times, CAIR attempted to stop SSI training in Seattle last Memorial Day and failed.

As Americans, we can not allow the civil liberties of our great country to be exploited by groups that are intent on creating a fundamentalist Islamic regime here in the USA“, says Sol Bradman, CEO of Security Solutions International, the organizers of the Sarasota Sheriffs 3rd Annual Gulf Coast Terrorism conference being held in Sarasota from the 15th to the 19th of September for the benefit of Homeland Security professionals – coming from as far as Australia to attend what is being called the most innovative terrorism prevention conference in the USA.

“This is not about incitement against Muslims, as CAIR wants us to believe. Our mission is to protect all Americans against terrorism but also against the abuse of our laws.” This is Lawfare against US First Responders and therefore against the USA by the pseudo legal wing of the Global Jihad in America,” says Bradman. “The modus operandi is simple; use the freedoms and loopholes of the most liberal national on earth to help finance and direct the world’s most violent international terrorism cells.” Continue reading

CAIR shakes down HD Supply subsidiary Crown Bolt

Read how this story goes from some ‘graffiti’ on a bathroom stall to a CAIR complain about being denied benefits.

Mohamed Elharragui felt a mixture of anger and fear when he saw the graffiti on the men’s room wall at the warehouse in North Middleton Township, Pa., where he worked.

In a photo he said he took with his cellphone that morning at the Crown Bolt warehouse, the scrawled words are green against a beige wall: “Kill the Mexicans, kill the Iraqs, kill the Muslums (sic).”

The next day, profane threats ranted not only against Muslims but also against Allah, the Arabic word for God, Elharragui said.

A manager expressed dismay and had the graffiti effaced, but there was no “big meeting to talk to the people,” Elharragui said.

Three weeks ago, he and 17 other workers — mostly African immigrants and Muslims — walked out of a workplace they said was biased.

The Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission said it has filed a complaint against Crown Bolt on behalf of the workers. The complaint alleges that they were harassed and denied benefits on the basis of ancestry and religion, and that their religious practice was not reasonably accommodated, spokeswoman Shannon Powers said. She provided no details.

The 18 Crown Bolt workers — many of them immigrants from war-torn Somalia and Sudan — contacted the local chapter of the Council on American Islamic Relations and the Somali Community of Central Pennsylvania, which took the case to the commission.

All but eight of the workers have returned to Crown Bolt, apparently in response to management apologies, said Madina Hasson of the Somali group.

Complaint filed over anti-Muslim graffiti –

Pakistani lawmaker defends ‘honour’ killings as 5 women buried alive

Aug 30, 2008 09:37 AM ROBIN McDOWELL The Associated Press

ISLAMABAD–A Pakistani lawmaker defended a decision by southwestern tribesmen to bury five women alive because they wanted to choose their own husbands, telling stunned members of Parliament this week to spare him their outrage.

“These are centuries-old traditions and I will continue to defend them,” Israr Ullah Zehri, who represents Baluchistan province, said Saturday. “Only those who indulge in immoral acts should be afraid.”

The women, three of whom were teenagers, were first shot and then thrown into a ditch.

They were still breathing as their bodies were covered with rocks and mud, according media reports and human rights activists, who said their only “crime” was that they wished to marry men of their own choosing | World | Women buried alive in ‘honour’ killings.

Sharia hell – who’s leading the way?

Lawrence Auster at View from the Right calls it like it is on who is to blame for creeping sharia in the West – and it ain’t just liberals as FrontPage suggests. Also read the FrontPage piece to see just how far sharia is creeping in Canada. FYI, VFR mentioned Creeping Sharia which is how we learned of that fine site. ~

Conservative hypocrites attack liberals for their hypocrisy

I see this article on the front page of FrontPage Magazine:

Harems and Hypocrites
By: Stephen Brown
Liberals ignore Muslim imam’s performing 30 polygamous
marriages in Toronto. More>

I think it ought to be changed to:

Harems and Hypocrites
By: Stephen Brown
Conservatives ignore 20 million polygamy- and sharia-believing Muslims
immigrating into the West, while the same conservatives
attack liberals for ignoring Muslim polygamy. More>

The first sentence of Brown’s article is:

It is just one more example of liberal cowardliness leading us to Sharia hell.

I think it ought to be changed to:

It is just one more example of conservative cowardliness leading us to Sharia hell.

–end of initial entry–I sent this blog entry to Stephen Brown, along with the following note:

Mr. Brown, don’t you think it’s ridiculous to allow the mass immigration of polygamy- and sharia-believing Muslim into the West, to remain utterly silent and accepting of the fact that they are mass-immigrating into the West, and then to complain about the fact that once the polygamy- and sharia-believing Muslims are here, they are–gasp–seeking to practice polygamy and sharia?

And don’t you also think it’s ridiculous to complain about the fact that the increasing numbers and political clout of these polygamy- and sharia-believing Muslims–made possible solely by the mass immigration of Muslims that you do not oppose–lead liberal politicians increasingly to yield to the desires of these polygamy- and sharia-believing Muslims?

Has the thought of the absurdity and hypocrisy of this position EVER ONCE occurred to you? Even once?

~ Related in Canada:

Shariah by Stealth

Minnesota Muslims File Another Lawsuit

If an employer incurs “undue hardship” which can include diminished efficiency, infringement on other employees’ rights, and impaired workplace safety, the employer is not required to accommodate religious beliefs and practices. Is a national campaign needed on these legal fine points?

Protest targets Gold’n Plump

By Britt Johnsen,

A group of about two dozen former employees of Gold’n Plump Poultry rallied in St. Cloud on Wednesday, after some of the workers said about 30 night-shift workers were fired for praying during a break at Minnesota’s largest chicken producer.

The former employees, who are Muslim, walked from the corner of 13th Avenue and St. Germain Street to the Stearns County Courthouse and other areas in downtown St. Cloud, holding signs speaking out against Gold’n Plump.

Gold’n Plump representatives did not accommodate an interview Wednesday, but the company issued a statement saying it supports diversity and is dedicated to a positive work environment for all employees.

The complaints are not the first for the St. Cloud-based company, which was involved in a 2006 lawsuit over racial and religious discrimination claims.

Employees who said they were fired last week are now working with a lawyer, said Mohamoud Mohamed, director of the St. Cloud Area Somali Salvation Organization.

The issues

In an interview last week at the St. Cloud Area Somali Salvation Organization, a group of about 20 Muslims who worked at Gold’n Plump’s Cold Spring plant told their side of the story. Continue reading

Free Speech Vs. Lawsuit Terrorism

…”civilizations have always died by suicide, not murder.

Creeping Sharia through litigation jihad from Investor’s Business Daily.

Posted 4/14/2008, IBD

Islamofascism: Suicide bombs aren’t the only chilling weapon Islamists are using in their war to the death with Western civilization. Exploiting the free world’s laws on libel and so-called hate speech, they intimidate truth-telling writers.

When American Center for Democracy director Rachel Ehrenfeld in 2003 authored “Funding Evil: How Terrorism Is Financed — and How to Stop It,” she was intellectually taking part in the global war on terror. But she also ended up becoming enmeshed in an international legal war.

Saudi banker and suspected al-Qaida financial supporter Sheikh Khalid bin Mahfouz and his sons were named in the book and Mahfouz sued Ehrenfeld for libel in Britain — although only 23 copies of the American-published “Funding Evil” were purchased there, online.

British libel law is notoriously geared to the advantage of the plaintiff. So Ehrenfeld chose not to defend her case, and in 2005 High Court Justice Sir David Eady pronounced a default judgment ordering Ehrenfeld to apologize and pay $225,000.

Ehrenfeld countersued in the U.S., but the courts ruled they had no personal jurisdiction over Mahfouz under New York state law. As a result, Ehrenfeld is now discouraged from traveling abroad to promote her important, potentially life-saving work. And publishers, too, will be discouraged from printing her future books by the fear of being sued for large sums of money.

This is but one case in an intensifying global jihad against those who dare to exercise free speech to expose the tactics of terrorists, or criticize Islamic extremism.

Even the oldest publishing house in the world, Cambridge University Press, which printed its first book over 420 years ago, last year sullied its prestigious reputation by melting before a separate Mahfouz libel suit. Continue reading

March 9, 1977: Hanafi Muslims siege DC hostages, kill 2

In 1977, before the Internet and some of our readers were born, a group of 12 Hanafi Muslims conducted coordinated raids on several Washington, DC buildings taking more than 100 hostages and killing two people and wounding future mayor Marion Barry.

A 2007 report from David Statter at 9NEWS NOW, Hanafi Siege: 30 Years Later:

Thirty years ago on March 9th, much of downtown Washington came to a standstill. Armed men had stormed B’nai Brith Headquarters at Scott Circle, The Islamic Center on Massachusetts Avenue and later the District Building.

More than 100 people were held hostage by 12 Hanafi Muslims. Killed in the takeover, a young radio reporter and a security guard. Wounded, with a bullet in his chest, then council member Marion Barry. Continue reading


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36,270 other followers

%d bloggers like this: