ISIS Supporting Muslims Flash Islamic Flag in Front of White House

via ISIS Supporters Flash Islamic Flag in Front of White House – Threaten America | The Gateway Pundit.

A photo posted to Twitter on Saturday by a supporter of the terrorist group the Islamic State (aka ISIS or ISIL) shows a cellphone screen with a large image of the black flag of jihad being held up so the White House is seen in the background. The Twitter account @mhajr93 posted the image.

xisis-phone-white-house.jpg.pagespeed.ic.qTwutJekqW

 The undated photo was taken at night from the Pennsylvania Avenue side of the White House. The brightly lit North Portico is clearly seen in the background of the photo.

Alongside the photo was the propaganda message, “we are here #America near our #target :) sooooooooooooon”. The #AmessagefromISIStoUS hashtag employed by ISIS and its supporters after President Obama launched airstrikes on ISIS forces in northern Iraq this week was used. The counter hashtag #AmessagefromUStoISIS was also used.

The photo was posted again hours later with the message, “we are everywhere”.

And the photo was posted again today with another threat.

Earlier this week The Gateway Pundit reported on ISIS’ vow to one day “raise the flag of Muhammad in the White House.”

Twitter is aiding and abetting Muslim terrorists and allowing them to recruit and terrorize using the Twitter service.

is-warningarticle-2720309-205F597400000578-338_634x369As the jihadists punk Obama government social media follies…and failures.

9th US Circuit Court Judge gives sharia legal consideration in “Innocence of Muslims” ruling

via Florida Family Association.

9th US Circuit Court Chief Judge Alex Kozinski gives legal consideration to Sharia fatwa in amended opinion for en banc hearing of his order to quash YouTube’s First Amendment Right to post anti-Islam film “Innocence of Muslims.”

Click here to send your email asking 43 appellate court judges to reverse 3 judge panel ruling and affirm district court order.

 Florida Family Association sent out several email alerts earlier this year that reported a 3 judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered Google on February 26, 2014 to remove the controversial movie “Innocence of Muslims” from Youtube.com.  The panel voted 2-1 to reverse a lower court order that denied the injunction sought in Cindy Lee Garcia’s law suit.  Garcia sued Google on October 17, 2012 seeking a restraining order that would require Youtube.com to remove “Innocence of Muslims”  from their web service.  Garcia claimed that she had a copyright for a five second video that was incorporated into the film and that she had not given permission for its use in the movie.  She also claimed that she would suffer irreparable harm from an Islamic fatwa if the movie were not removed from access on the World Wide Web.

 Innocence of Muslims” which sparked protests across the Muslim world “depicts Muhammad as a feckless philanderer who approved of child sexual abuse, among other overtly insulting claims that have caused outrage.   In a 13 minute 51 second trailer, the Islamic prophet is made to look like a murderer and adulterer as well” according to TheBlaze.com

 Defendant Google, who owns YouTube, had petitioned the appellate court to hear the case en banc by all of the justices in the 9th US Circuit.   However, the en banc hearing was delayed until now to allow the three judge panel to amend the opinion and dissent.  The court amended the opinion and dissent on July 11, 2014.  This opinion amendment was not posted on the court’s web site until July 24,2014.

9th US Circuit Court Chief Judge Alex Kozinski amended opinion states in part:

 

  • While answering a casting call for a low-budget amateur film doesn’t often lead to stardom, it also rarely turns an aspiring actress into the subject of a fatwa. But that’s exactly what happened to Cindy Lee Garcia when she agreed to act in a film with the working title “Desert Warrior.”
  • These, of course, are fighting words to many faithful Muslims and, after the film aired on Egyptian television, there were protests that generated worldwide news coverage.  An Egyptian cleric issued a fatwa, calling for the killing of everyone involved with the film, and Garcia soon began receiving death threats. She responded by taking a number of security precautions and asking that Google remove the video from YouTube.
  • There’s nothing in the record to suggest that Youssef was in the “regular business” of making films. Reid, 490 U.S. at 752. He’d held many jobs, but there’s no indication he ever worked in the film industry.  And there’s no evidence he had any union contracts, relationships with prop houses or other film suppliers, leases of studio space or distribution agreements.  The dissent would hold that Youssef was in the “regular business” of filmmaking simply because he made “Innocence of Muslims.” But if shooting a single amateur film amounts to the regular business of filmmaking, every schmuck with a video camera becomes a movie mogul.

 Chief Judge Alex Kozinski’s opinion which references the fatwa against Garcia essentially elevates the Sharia law command to censor blasphemy of Muhammad over the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.  This lawsuit would never have happened were it not for the fatwa issued by the Egyptian Imam that ordered the killing of anyone involved in the production of “Innocence of Muslims.”  Garcia did not take legal action until six months after the video was released.  The fatwa is the potential “irreparable harm,” one of four factors required for a restraining order, sited in the appellate court’s opinion for the basis of ordering Google to remove “Innocence of Muslims” from YouTube.  Any restraining order should be focused on the Islamists who want to kill Americans not on Americans who want to exercise their First Amendment Rights.

 Additionally, Chief Judge Alex Kozinski’s opinion prejudicially determines who serious producers are and who are not and elevates the copyrights of “aspiring actresses” over first time producers.  Judge Kozinski’s opinion erroneously discounts the fact that Youseff, the film’s producer paid Garcia, the actress, $500 for her video footage at issue.  Judge Kozinski’s opinion prejudicially establishes that copyrights for amateurs and professionals are different when the court should be establishing equity.

 Chief Judge Alex Kozinski’s opinion could empower Islamists to focus their angst against more actors in videos and perhaps people in photos with the goal of influencing them to demand removal of the same from movies, website posts or blog posts.  The Council on American Islamic Relations’ censorship of American films has been robust lately.  CAIR recently boasted:  CAIR has challenged actual and potential anti-Muslim stereotypes in productions such as ABC Family network’s “Alice in Arabia,” “Executive Decision,” “24,” “The Siege,” “True Lies,” “Rules of Engagement,” “Obsession,” “The Third Jihad,” “Jihad in America,” and “The Sum of All Fears.”

 Now the full 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals will hear the panel’s troubled ruling that was approved by a 2-1 vote.

 Florida Family Association has prepared an email for you to send to the forty three 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals justices urging them to affirm the First Amendment rights that all Americans cherish by reversing the panel’s troubled ruling and affirming the district court’s order.  Florida Family Association is taking a position in this case based upon judicial principle and without regard to the parties involved or content of the movie.

 To send your email, please click the following link, enter your name and email address then click the “Send Your Message” button. You may also edit the subject or message text if you wish.  

 Please click here to send your email to forty three 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals judges.


 Send your email now or after reading FFA’s complete Email issue history.

 

Youtube, Vimeo Enforce Sharia, Delete the “Aisha and Muhammad” Movie

via Vimeo Also Deletes the “Aisha and Muhammad” Movie – Air-Tight Censorship against Criticism of Islam in Western Media.

Those, who are aware of the newly-released movie, “Aisha and Muhammad”, by producer Imran Firasat should already know that Youtube stood in constant and firm vigilance with an iron-whip in hand to strike down any attempt to promote the movie on its website.

Youtube deactivated the first link of the movie within one-and-a-half hours of activation. The second link was deactivated faster that the first. That’s how youtube dealt with Imran Firasat’s movie.

What baflles us most is the fact that youtube fought hard a legal battle to keep the rather shoddily made video, “The Innocence of Muslims”, after one of it actresses, following death-threat from Muslims, initiated a legal proceeding against Youtube after it rejected her request to remove the video on the ground of defending freedom of expression. The protracted legal battle ran on for nearly a year, and in the final court verdict, youtube lost the case a few months ago, and regretfully deleted the video, terming it a bad day for freedom of expression.

Compared to “The Innocence of Muslims”, “Aisha and Muhammad” is much more serious movie based on a much better-researched and better-written story setting with the critical elements of the movie fortified by accompaying references from original and respectable Islamic sources. Moreover, the story in the movie, which is rather grossly and lewedly described in Islamic sources, is presented in a very measured and restrained manner in this movie.

Having advised Imran Firasat on the production of the movie whenever he sought guidance, and seen it multiple times, I am firmly certain that Muslims will never protest, let alone engage in violence, over a movie like this, since it is based on the normative Islamic narratives of the past 14 hundred years. And so far, although various Islamic organizations are talking about insults of the prophet in the movie, are not calling upon the willing followers of Islam to take to the street in protest against it.

Amidst youtube’s resolute censorship of the movie, which has severely limited its reach to the viewers, now vimeo.com, which runs on a paid service platform, has also deleted the movie without any prior consultation with Imran Firasat, despite the fact that he paid for hosting the video on vimeo.com. Only after deleting the movie, they sent him an email to inform about the deletion. Here’s the screenshot of the email Imran Firasat received:

The ground for vimeo.com’s removal of the movie is that it either “harass, incite hatred or depict excessive violence”. Those, who have watched the movie, will clearly know that neither vimeo.com or Muslims will be able to show anything in the movie that harass” anybody, “incite hatred” against anybody or any community, or “depict excessive violence”.

To be noted that LiveLeak and DailyMotion also deleted all the trailers of the movie that Imran Firasat had posted in those sites.

So, that’s the way things seem to go even in the Western world today in the name of censorship about Islam. Vimeo.com (as well as youtube) is violating its own terms and conditions, and guideline, and is instead accusing Imran Firasat of doing the same, who has done absolutely none of that.

We all know that the mainstream western media have for a long time been a pliant servant of Islam, disregarding its responsibility of defending freedom of expression guaranteed in the UN Charter and in the Constitutions of Western nations. And now, even low-key media outlets like Youtube, Google, Facebook, LiveLeak, Daily Motion, and Vimeo etc., which had until now kept a flicker of hope for freedom of expression alive in the West, are also toeing the well-orchestrated Islamist line.

Therefore, freedom of expression, a most cherished human right established in the western world, is all set to die a quick death from the face of the earth, at least as far as its application to Islam is conerned.

 The video can be seen in full here.

Twitter helps Muslims celebrate ‘Month of Jihad’ with new icons

via New Twitter icons help Muslims celebrate Ramadan – Telegraph.

Twitter has launched new hashtag icons for Ramadan and Eid to help 1.5 billion Muslims around the world celebrate the ninth month of the Islamic calendar.

Another feature will help Muslims find out what time each day they can break their fast. From tomorrow they will be able to tweet @AlArabiya with #iftar followed by the name of their city. They will then receive a reply with what time they are allowed to eat. It will also work for #Imsak, or the beginning of the fast.

 Untitled-3_2955682c

Twitter’s Ahmad AbouAmmo said in a blog post announcing the new features: “Use hashtags to tweet how your neighborhood, city or country is celebrating the month and connect with others across the world who are also observing and celebrating Ramadan.”

“Ramadan is an important event around the world — full of celebration, friends and families. We look forward to seeing how many of you come together to share these special moments on Twitter.”

Regular readers here know that Ramadan is the “month of jihad” – according to Muslims themselves.

Facebook Exec to Headline Event at Sharia-Promoting Muslim Groups’ Annual Gala

Creeping while you’re sleeping, via Big Peace.

Facebook Exec to Headline Muslim Advocates’ ‘Countering Hate on the Internet’ Dinner

Increasingly, the war in the information battlespace is being waged outside the hallowed halls of the enemedia. The Islamic supremacist group Muslim Advocates has announced that its Annual Gala 2014 on May 3 will host an “onstage conversation” about “countering hate on the internet” featuring Monika Bickert, the Head of Global Policy Management for Facebook, along with Muslim Advocates’ Executive Director Farhana Khera and Hilary Shelton of the NAACP.

The key to winning this war for freedom is in the war of ideas. So the apparatuses that truth-tellers and voices of freedom including my colleagues and me use, tools such as Facebook, Twitter, and Linkedin, are of cardinal importance. When news from my website AtlasShrugs.com goes viral, invariably it is Facebook that drives it.

This makes sense. Facebook is the personal bulletin board for millions of Americans, on which they share family photos, personal victories or defeats, and news that they believe to be of critical importance. So of course Atlas Shrugs news items would be trafficked there frequently. And that’s why this particular news story about Monika Bickert’s appearance at the Muslim Advocates Annual Gala, although innocuous on its face, is of grave significance.

Islamic supremacists and stealth jihadists are very aware of the ways in which voices of freedom get the word out after having been blacklisted from conventional means of communication and information dissemination. And so these well-funded savages host expensive, silly dinners, galas, and conferences full of empty praise and flattery for clueless tools like Bickert. While Bickert’s name is clearly not on the lips and minds of most Americans, she has the keys to the proverbial kingdom. She is the gatekeeper.

Who exactly is Monika Bickert? As Head of Global Policy Management for Facebook, she is Facebook’s speech police. So is it any wonder that groups like Muslim Advocates would be feting her? Muslim Advocates is an organization of Sharia enforcers, enforcers of the blasphemy laws under Sharia. According to the Investigative Project on Terrorism, in 2011 Khera wrote a letter, also signed by 57 Muslim and allied organizations, to then-Homeland Security Adviser John Brennan, demanding that he create “an interagency task force, led by the White House” to “review all counterterror trainers, so as to purge those that the Muslim organizations, which included many with Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood ties, found unacceptable.” FBI trainers such as Islamic scholar Robert Spencer were summarily dropped.

Khera also demanded that the Obama Administration:

“[P]urge all federal government training materials of biased materials”; “implement a mandatory re-training program for FBI agents, U.S. Army officers, and all federal, state and local law enforcement who have been subjected to biased training”; and more to ensure that only the message about Islam and jihad preferred by the signatories would get through to intelligence and law enforcement agents.

Counter-terror training materials were subsequently scrubbed of all mention of Islam and jihad in connection with terrorism, leaving our law enforcement agents completely unequipped to understand the foremost terror threat of our time.

Groups like these have millions of dollars and an obviously subversive mission, and for them someone like Bickert is a key player. How many of you who are reading this know exactly what I’m talking about? How many of you have been banned from Facebook for twenty-four hours for posting a jihad story or saying something that might offend Muslims? I myself have been banned numerous times for merely posting a link to a jihad article. The well-oiled machine of Islamic supremacists descends daily on Facebook and flags or reports stories that they deem unacceptable for the eyes of the Facebook user and American news consumer.

We cannot abandon Facebook or the other enormously popular social media outlets. We cannot cede the field. The freedom of speech doesn’t mean the freedom to speak in the wilderness, where no one is there to hear us. That’s not what freedom of speech is. Freedom of speech is the protection of all ideas, not just those that global jihadists deem to be Sharia-compliant.

Despite this fictional narrative about a “lucrative Islamophobia industry,” counter-jihad freedom fighters don’t have the funds to fete a tool like Bickert. Only groups like Muslim Advocates do.

These “galas” such as the one that Muslim Advocates is holding should chill you and compel you to action. Many of my colleagues, such as Anders Gravers of Stop Islamisation of Europe (SIOE) have been silenced. His personal Facebook page and organization page have been disabled, shut down, and silenced by these same supremacist cretins.

Most Americans assume that we all share a value system based on freedom and individual rights. But such an assumption can no longer be made. You can’t expect that such freedoms will be automatically protected. We have to fight every single battle. Every attack. We have to counter every hostile attack on our freedoms with an equal or more powerful response. Otherwise, make no mistake: we will lose our freedom of speech. Its continued existence is not guaranteed. Its survival depends on us.


Screen-Shot-2014-04-12-at-1.44.33-AM

As Creeping Sharia noted in 2010 post, the same Farhana Khera of Muslim Advocates also demanded asked the DOJ to start enforcing sharia blasphemy laws in America.

Facebook is notorious for ignoring privacy rights and is a funding a massive campaign to subvert U.S. law through amnesty for illegal aliens, thereby encouraging millions more to illegally enter the U.S. and  further destroy the middle and lower economic classes who bear the brunt of the economic impact.

 

Google’s Gmail blocks Wilders’ anti-Islam sticker mail account

googlecuffs

via DutchNews.nl – Gmail ‘blocks’ Wilders’ anti-Islam sticker mail account. h/t Islamist Watch

Email system Gmail has blocked an account set up by Geert Wilders to distribute an anti-Islam sticker, the Dutch politician claimed on Friday.

‘Unbelievable but Google has blocked the account islamsticker@gmail.com. So Mohammed Rabbae’s complaint was successful,’ Wilders said, using the microblogging service Twitter. He was referring to a complaint about the sticker by a lobby group Landelijk Beraad Marokkanen led by former GroenLinks MP Rabbae.

However, according to tech website Techzine, Google’s systems work largely on automatic pilot and there is a good chance multiple complaints about the address had been received, leading the system to automatically shut it down.

The sticker is a play on the Saudi flag and says in Arabic ‘Islam is a lie. Mohammed is a criminal. The Koran is poison’.

FYI: The new email address is islamsticker@islamsticker.org

Shoebat.com has some background on Wilders’ flag via Geert Wilders targets Saudi Flag and EU simultaneously:

Yesterday, on his blog, Wilders slapped the Saudis while that country was no doubt, busy being outraged at the sweet nuclear deal Iran got courtesy of the Obama administration. Wilders posted his idea for a new Saudi flag and explained why:

The flag of Saudi Arabia proudly proclaims the Shahada or the Islamic declaration of faith: “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.”

In remembrance of the past nine years, in remembrance of the thousands of victims who were murdered in that period by Islamic assassins, in London, in Moscow, in Mumbai, in Nairobi, and in countless other places, and in remembrance of the millions of people – women, apostates, non-Muslims – who daily suffer discrimination and humiliation from the evil ideology of Islam and oppressive Islamic Sharia law, I offer the Islamic world a new flag – a flag with a declaration of truth and liberation: “Islam is a lie, Muhammad a criminal, the Koran is poison.”

Wilders_Saudi_Flag

Just a few short days earlier, Wilders penned an op-ed that appeared in the Wall Street Journal. In it, he essentially predicts that the elections across Europe in May will result in a major defeat for the European Union and victories for patriotism.

Via WSJ:

Here is a tip if you want to ruin the day of the bureaucrats and politicians in Brussels. Just mention next year’s European elections and they will become extremely nervous and agitated. They will fume with anger and warn you about rising populism, a threat to democracy.

Next May’s European elections, in which almost 400 million people in the 28 EU member states will be allowed to cast their votes, will in all likelihood produce a landslide against the Eurocrats. What will manifest itself, however, is not a rise of populism, but a victory for democracy.

For decades, Brussels has been able to do what it pleases. That period is over. People have finally come to realize that so-called europhiles aim to destroy Europe’s nations, the homes of national democracies. And people are not going to let it happen. They are no longer buying the lie that patriotism is dangerous, that it is a vice and not a virtue. They are reasserting their national pride and identity.

Robert Schuman, who was one of the EU’s founding fathers 60 years ago, used to say that the aim of European integration was “to make war not only unthinkable but materially impossible.” But the idea that Germany, France, Britain and other nations in the past went to war because they were sovereign nations is simply ridiculous. They went to war because they had fallen for totalitarian ideologies. Democracies do not go to war against each other; they trade with one another.

In his piece, Wilders refers to the EU as a “prison of nations” and clearly believes that the climate for patriotism is ripe for return all across Europe.

Read it all.

If you haven’t already, stop using Google services.

Long Island: Muslims hack websites on eve of 9/11, post bin Laden videos

via UPDATE: East End Veterinary Emergency & Specialty Center in Riverhead Hacked by Same Group Claiming to Hijack Sag Harbor Village Website Tuesday | The Sag Harbor Express.

By Kathryn G. Menu

UPDATE, 12:50 p.m.: The East End Veterinary Emergency & Specialty Center in Riverhead was hacked Tuesday afternoon by the same group claiming to have hijacked Sag Harbor Village’s website. According to the Facebook page of Fahd Al Murar, whose alias KJ-FIDO claimed responsibility for hacking the village’s webpage, at 12:30 p.m. the vet center’s website, pet-er.com, was also hacked, displaying a different message.

“The website is down by web-soldiers team from Islamic Electronic Army(Alqaeda Army),” reads the webpage. “[Please do not close Page] “Sorry admin just message” Freedom to all Muslims everywhere.”

By 1:30 p.m., the page was restored.

The Village of Sag Harbor’s website, sagharborny.gov, was hijacked Tuesday morning. For roughly a half hour, a six minute video featuring Osama Bin Laden played on the website. According to the page, the site was hijacked by Web Soldiers Team from the Islamic Electronic Army, which referred to itself on the hijacked website as a part of the Al Qaeda Army.

Beneath the video image of Osama Bin Laden, the web page read “KJ-FIDO WAS HERE.”

“the message: we are muslims | we are many | we are strong | if you touch one person from us we will destroy you, your life, your country, your happiness | we launched this event named #OP_USA and #OP_ISRAEL | believe me this is the last time you hear something named Israel !!! FREE PALESTINE | FREE SYRIA | FREE AFGHANISTAN | FREE MUSLIMS,” read the webpage.

According to village officials, Harbor Master Bob Bori discovered the hacking Tuesday morning. By 11:20 a.m. technicians had already taken down the content and were working to restore the website.

By 11:40 p.m. the website was restored, but by noon the content had returned. Technicians again restored the site by 12:30 p.m.

To Muslims, free yourself…from Islam.

Mother Jones wants to know why Muslims love gay porn so much

Curious topic for the rabidly Islamophilic and pro-sharia Mother Jones to pursue. via Why Is Gay Porn So Popular in Pakistan? | Mother Jones.

In its report, Pew noted that countries exhibiting the highest levels of gay tolerance are largely secular, whereas nations where religion is central to public lifesuch as Egypt, Nigeria, and Pakistantend to reject homosexuality. But in Pakistan, what’s even more peculiar is that the highest number of hits for some of these terms, including “shemale sex,” come not from Pakistan’s cosmopolitan centers, but from Peshawar, a bastion of conservative Islam, lately known in the West as a counterterrorism frontline.

Of course Muslims love of gay porn is nothing new and was reported by Islamophobes more than three years ago, Pakistan leads world in web searches for animal sex, rape pics, child sex.

Here’s hoping the fellas at Mother Jones delve further into the topic with the same passion they attack those who oppose jihad and sharia law in the U.S.

And here are the top search terms that lead Muslims to Creeping Sharia:

search-terms

Facebook Enforcing Islamic Blasphemy Law on Counter-Jihad Pages

via Blog: Blasphemy Law Comes to Facebook.

Over the last couple of weeks Facebook has clamped down heavily on various (around 40) counter-jihad and patriot pages.

The administrators of these pages were shocked when they logged on and found that their pages had suddenly ‘disappeared’. In some cases Facebook has made this statement: ‘Your Page was flagged for content containing nudity, pornography or sexual solicitation.’ The page admins, however, have claimed not to have posted anything with explicitly sexual content. What will have happened is that Muslims, and/or the Leftist whores/enablers-of-Islam, will have ‘reported’ these pages for ‘sexual content’ knowing full well that it would be much more difficult to make a political/religious case for banning them. (I’ve been reported by a Hope Not Hate (UK) member, and then banned by Facebook, for an innocent cartoon image — Facebook used the phrase ‘sexual content’ then too.) These pages will therefore have been consistently reported by Muslims, and/or Leftists, for anti-Islamic content, not for sexual or violent content.

So, perhaps unknowingly, the automated machine that is Facebook will mainly respond to Muslim and Leftist ‘reports’ without looking into their true nature and seeing they are in fact being taken for a ride by such people. And because Facebook is free it simply won’t have the manpower to check all reports. Thus it will ban indiscriminately — on reports alone. Either that, or the Muslims and Leftists who work for Facebook are taking matters into their own hands by imposing Sharia Blasphemy Law on Facebook without its owners, or those at the top level, knowing this.

Here are some of the pages banned by Facebook recently.

On the 19th on June, ‘Ban Islam’ was itself banned. (‘Ban Islam’ had at least 45,000 followers.) The admin immediately set up ‘Ban Islam 2′ only to be banned again a couple of days ago. ‘Islam Against Women’, ‘Islam Free Planet’ and many others have also been banned. The blog Sharia Unveiled estimates that around 40 pages have been banned in the last couple of weeks. And, as that blog puts it, ‘from what we are hearing, this is only the beginning’.

Read it all.

Muslim “Mark Zuckerberg” conned Cali investor out of $1M

via Con man exposed after Justin Bieber ruse – CNN.com.

(CNN) — Waleed Ahmed grins for the camera, a sly smile on his face as he poses in front of a black Porsche parked on the street.

At first glance, he looks like any other young guy hamming it up for an image to share with his buddies on Facebook.

Yet looks can be deceiving.

The Norwegian gained fame and fortune in his 20s — enough to own that shiny, black Porsche in the photo — after supposedly inventing an iPhone cover that uses solar energy to charge the phone.

Norway’s media dubbed him the “Mark Zuckerberg of Norway,” and the government even posted a video on its website of Ahmed and his then-business partner meeting with Norway’s minister of trade and industry to show off the solar iPhone case.

Ahmed’s fame led to numerous encounters with international royalty and well-known diginitaries, including the crown prince and princess of Norway, former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan, former U.N. Ambassador Andrew Young and CNN founder Ted Turner.

Ahmed apparently wasn’t just an innovative genius: He said he had been selected to be the chairman of Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign in Norway.

So, when Ahmed approached California investor Todd Weinberg last summer about his latest business proposition — managing Justin Bieber’s 2013 Scandinavian tour — it didn’t seem like a stretch that the young genius could secure the rights to the pop star’s multimillion-dollar tour.

But the business deal between Ahmed and Weinberg would go terribly wrong. In the end, it would uncover a story that reads like the plot of a Hollywood movie.

Weinberg said he paid $860,000 to Ahmed to secure the concert venues and $140,000 to Karmic Management to get a website created and for other parts of the deal.

“After I invested the money, there was a lot of friendly collaborations happening,” Weinberg said. “A lot of e-mails coming back and forth. Waleed was very involved and we started talking about who our ticketing agency was going to be, which was an organization that everyone has heard of. … We hired a company to start developing a website for the Scandinavian leg of the tour.”

But it wasn’t long before, as Weinberg put it, “a couple of things went off track.”

First, Weinberg said he started getting nervous when Ahmed “went off the radar” for 10 days.

“Well, you can imagine after 10 days, we are freaking out,” Weinberg said. “Something is not right. Well, he surfaces and tells us, ‘I’m sorry, you know, I was basically out for a Muslim holiday. I was out for Ramadan, and I’m sorry, but I am back. Let’s go.’ “

NY Times helps al Jazeera recruit 18,000 job applicants

The New Duranty Times aids al Jihad TV in finding suckers traitors employees for 12 U.S. bureaus.

via FFA:

The New York Times appears to be vying for a kissing cousin relationship with Al Jazeera America aka CurrentTV. The New York Times published a report titled “Al Jazeera Hires First Anchor for New U.S. Channel” which appears to applaud the Islamist news organization ‘s hiring of a CNN anchor. The report boasts how 180,000 people applied for 170 positions at Al Jazeera America.

The New York Times article also reports that Al Jazeera plans to bring in sixty percent (60%) of the content for their new Al Jazeera America channel from “Al Jazeera English, whose headquarters are in Doha, the Qatari capital.”  If Al Jazeera is going to bring in more than half of their new American cable channel’s content from Qatar how long will it be before they air their most popular host.

Florida Family Association has issued seven email alerts that targeted companies which advertised with the New York Times since January 2012.  The full details on this effort are posted here under the title “New York Times spews more pro-Islamist propaganda, stiffs Israel, sides with PLO just before Obama’s awkward trip to the Holy Land.”  

Ninety-two companies have not advertised with the New York Times after receiving thousands of emails from American consumers that complained after the newspaper:

  • Accepted advertising from Al Jazeera America to build their channel in the US.
  • Called the United States Constitution “evil.”
  • Questioned the inclusion of freedom of speech and religion in the constitution.
  • Admired Al Jazeera’s acquisition of U.S. cable channel CurrentTV.
  • Applauded Al Gore for bringing Islamist cable news to America.
  • Attacked the widely acclaimed video used by the NYPD in counter terrorist training.
  • Rejected a full-page anti-Islam advertisement that mimicked a controversial anti-Catholic advertisement they published on March 9, 2012.
  • Pitifully branded Muslims in France as victims after a French-born Muslim slaughtered seven people including three children at a Jewish school.

The details regarding each issue above are posted here at Floridafamily.org.

It is time to focus on the few companies, one by one, that continue to advertise with the New York Times.  Capital One stands out because it is one of the few national companies that continue to advertise even after receiving thousands of emails during several of the seven email alerts.

Florida Family Association has prepared an email for you to send to five Capital One officials regarding their company’s advertising support for the New York Times.

To send your email, please click the following link, enter your name and email address then click the “Send Your Message” button. You may also edit the subject or message text if you wish.   Please Note:  Internet Explorer 10 is not compatible at this time with our Action Message.  Please use Internet Explorer 9 or Firefox or Chrome until Microsoft fixes the IE 10 bug.

Please click here to send your email to five Capital One officials regarding their company’s advertising support for the New York Times.

Related:

Hershey is a top advertiser on Al Jazeera America.   

Click here to send your email to eight Hershey officials.

Update:  It’s a pattern at NYT, The New York Times Erases Islam from Existence.

Chicago: Muslim doctor opening surgery center he says will follow sharia law

Back in 2008, we asked Muslim hospitals in the U.S.?  We know it’s being plotted, they tell us so.

h/t to USDL who asks,

“One must wonder if the Islamic practice of female genital mutilation will be performed at this location and if it will subject to the rules and regulations which everyone else in the United States will have to adhere to under Obamacare.”

via Mixing Islam with medicine – Islamic surgery center proposed for Orland Park – In Other News – Crain’s Chicago Business.

A Chicago doctor who owns a lavish Middle Eastern eatery on West Randolph Street wants to open the first outpatient surgery center in Illinois that he says will follow Islamic law.

Dr. Naser Rustom, who opened Alhambra Palace in 2007, has in mind a venture with a much more religious flavor. He proposes to establish a $5.5 million medical facility in southwest suburban Orland Park that would cater to Muslims, including space for prayer and ritual washing and partitions for enhanced patient privacy.

The proposal reflects how more businesses are looking to tap into the growing population of Arab-Americans and Muslims, offering products ranging from home mortgages to meat that satisfy religious standards. This comes at a time of passionate national debate over the religious rights of business owners, sparked by scores of lawsuits filed against the Obama administration over a regulation that requires employer health care plans to cover contraceptives.

Some interpretations of Shariah, or Islamic law, require strict segregation of the sexes, a practice that Dr. Rustom doesn’t intend to follow because, in his view, it likely would violate federal and state laws.

His plan for the Orland Park surgical center is a sign of how the Chicago area’s Muslim population is booming. Fueled in part by immigration from the Middle East and South Asia, the number of local adherents to Islam more than doubled, topping 300,000, between 2000 and 2010, and is expected to continue to climb.

Mass importation from terror states by government agencies, open borders and amnesty for 30 million illegals will easily double that number again in another ten years or less.

The center would lease space in a vacant Plunkett Furniture Co. store near the Orland Square Shopping Center. More Arab-Americans live in the southwest suburbs than anywhere else in the Chicago area, according to Dr. Rustom’s application with the Illinois Health Facilities and Services Review Board, citing demographic data.

Services would include gastroenterology, general surgery and treatment for pain management, the application says. The facilities board must approve the project.

Patients of all religious and cultural backgrounds will be treated at the center, which will not be different from other surgery centers except “to the trained eye,” the application says.

Proselytizing and dawah centers where poor non-Muslims will be converted?

Shariah is based on the Quran and other Islamic texts, but some aspects are open to interpretation, experts say.

In the Middle East, many health care facilities segregate waiting rooms by sex, says Rina Spence, a health care management consultant in Boston who worked in the Middle East for more than a decade.

Dr. Rustom doesn’t plan to adhere to that practice, says Robyn Fina, an employee of Dr. Rustom’s who is managing the project.

We recognize that a health care facility that is fully compliant with Shariah law would likely violate a number of state and federal laws,” Ms. Fina says in an email. Dr. Rustom declines to be interviewed. Interaction between the sexes will be kept “at a modest level,” she adds.

Some Muslims, particularly recent immigrants and women, delay seeking medical care because of perceived conflicts between their beliefs and the U.S. health care system, says Dr. Aasim Padela, an emergency medicine physician and director of the Initiative on Islam and Medicine at the University of Chicago.

In other words, they came to the U.S., but they want to live under male-dictated, Islamic sharia.

For example, female Muslims in Chicago who say they had experienced discrimination at a health care facility are five times less likely to receive regular mammograms than Muslims who did not feel bias, according to a study by Dr. Padela.

See some basic stats on Chicago’s growing Muslim and Arab population

20130429ChicagoMuslimStats

By focusing on Muslims, Dr. Rustom is following a path used by businesses in other industries.

Devon Bank started offering Shariah-compliant mortgages and commercial loans a decade ago, says David Loundy, CEO of the bank, which is located near Devon and Western avenues on the North Side, in an area bustling with Muslim businesses.

The deals use alternative structures, such as rent-to-own, because Islam forbids the payment of interest.

Best Chicago Meat Co., based on the Northwest Side, began selling halal meat, which is butchered in accordance with Islamic precepts, about five years ago, President David Van Kampen says. Halal meat accounts for 8 to 10 percent of annual revenue of more than $23 million.

At Indie Burger, a trendy eatery in Lakeview, customers can request sandwiches made with organic, grass-fed halal beef, says co-owner Cyrus Rab, who is Muslim. What they can’t get is alcohol, which is proscribed by Shariah.

A liquor license came with the location, but Mr. Rab opted to make the restaurant BYOB, even though he’s not exceptionally devout. “I still respect my faith,” he says.

Related: Hospitals in U.S. becoming more sharia compliant.

Chicago company hosting terrorist blind sheik’s website

His kinda town. via Blind sheik’s social media empire grows from behind bars | Washington Guardian.

The blind sheik, convicted of orchestrating the deadly World Trade Center bombing 20 years ago, has benefited from a sophisticated social media messaging machine despite serving life in prison in a solitary confinement cell in North Carolina.

And federal authorities can’t do anything to stop Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman because his family is running the show on YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and a website hosted in the United States – and there’s nothing illegal in the content of the sites’ messages.

Abdel-Rahman’s main website is hosted at SingleHop, in Chicago, Ill., according to dawhois.com, a website that registers servers and domains. Numerous phone calls made to SingleHop for comment were not returned.

Find them at @SingleHop

Much more at The Online Presence Of Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman – The Blind Sheikh: Official Website Hosted in Chicago, Active On YouTube, Twitter, And Facebook By: Steven Stalinsky*

Sheikh Dr. Omar Abdel-Rahman, aka ‘the Blind Sheikh,’ was arrested on July 1, 1993 in Brooklyn, New York and on October 1, 1995 was convicted of seditious conspiracy and solicitation to attack a military installation on Staten Island, and conspiracies to bomb New York landmarks. On January 17, 1996, he was sentenced to life in prison.

A federal jury convicted Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman of planning to wage a “war of urban terrorism” against the United States, including blowing up the United Nations building, the Holland and Lincoln tunnels, the main federal office building in Manhattan, and the George Washington Bridge.[1]

 

Somali Islamic Terror Group Back on Twitter

via Al Qaeda Group on Twitter After Ban – Yahoo! News.

Just two weeks after Twitter shut down its account, the Somali-based terror group al Shabaab has set up a new Twitter account and resumed tweeting out propaganda in English.

The al Qaeda affiliate’s old English-language Twitter account was suspended in January after al Shabaab used the account to post a series of threats. It said it planned to kill a French intelligence officer and then announced he had been killed. It tweeted out photos of a French special forces commander who had been killed during an unsuccessful attempt to free the intelligence officer. Al Shabaab also used the account to threaten the lives of Kenyans it was holding hostage.

According to rules posted on the company’s website, Twitter users “may not publish or post direct, specific threats of violence against others.”

The first tweet from the new account, which was launched early Monday, was the traditional Muslim greeting “In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate.” It was followed by a series of tweets taunting Twitter over the suspension of the group’s original account.

“For what it’s worth, shooting the messenger and suppressing the truth by silencing your opponents isn’t quite the way to win the war of ideas,” read one.

“In their quest to throttle the truth, the Kuffar forget that silencing@HSMPRESS only highlights the cause & justifies Mujahideen’s actions,” read another. “Freedom of Press is but a meaningless rhetoric. So long @HSMPress! You might be gone, but your legacy lives on.”

The original English-language account, which launched in late 2011, had more than 20,000 followers, including many Western journalists. The new account says it belongs to the “Press Office, Al-Shabaab Al Mujahideen.” Al Shabaab did not respond to an email inquiry by ABC News to confirm its link to the new account, though the BBC reports a member of the militant movement has confirmed its authenticity.

Related:

Twitter & Youtube host accounts for FBI’s most wanted terrorist

@Twitter Evades Explaining Indirect Support For Online Jihad, Breaking U.S. Law

Twitter replaces smuggled video as terrorists’ preferred way to communicate

Al Jazeera: Death to America (video)

Art imitating life. via Atlas Shrugs.

AFDI: Pamela Geller to Address “Investigate Al Jazeera Now” Press Conference”

Check out this MadTV Al Jazeera parody — before the enforcement of Islamic blasphemy laws in America. Could they ever do this segment now? Thanks to David Wood for the video. Join us on February 5.

http://youtu.be/TS4v_kj9rw4

Jerry Kenney has filed complaints with the Department of Justice citing evidence that Al Jazeera is not complying with the Foreign Agent Registration Act and labeling its broadcasts as foreign propaganda, paid for by the pro-Jihadist Arab government of Qatar. The DOJ refuses to enforce the law against Al Jazeera.

There is a real, present danger that Al Jazeera’s influence over jihadists in the US will inspire terrorist acts against Americans.

We sent a letter to Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), the chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, to open hearings into Jihadist propaganda channel Al Jazeera’s acquisition of Al Gore’s Current TV cable channel. “The announcement that the Qatar-funded enemy propaganda channel, which has functioned as a voice for al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, has taken over an existing U.S.-based cable TV channel, Current TV, must be examined by the Congress.” Read the letter here.

Contact Rep McCaul 202-225-2401, DC Fax:202-225-5955
Contact Representative McCaul: http://mccaul.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=133§iontree=3133 Twitter: @mccaulpressshop

Meanwhile, wouldn’t it be better to have some news from a little closer to home? Sun News perhaps? There’s a growing jihadist and sharia threat north of the border.  Help Sun News get carried on basic cable.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35,792 other followers

%d bloggers like this: