ISIS Supporting Muslims Flash Islamic Flag in Front of White House

via ISIS Supporters Flash Islamic Flag in Front of White House – Threaten America | The Gateway Pundit.

A photo posted to Twitter on Saturday by a supporter of the terrorist group the Islamic State (aka ISIS or ISIL) shows a cellphone screen with a large image of the black flag of jihad being held up so the White House is seen in the background. The Twitter account @mhajr93 posted the image.

xisis-phone-white-house.jpg.pagespeed.ic.qTwutJekqW

 The undated photo was taken at night from the Pennsylvania Avenue side of the White House. The brightly lit North Portico is clearly seen in the background of the photo.

Alongside the photo was the propaganda message, “we are here #America near our #target :) sooooooooooooon”. The #AmessagefromISIStoUS hashtag employed by ISIS and its supporters after President Obama launched airstrikes on ISIS forces in northern Iraq this week was used. The counter hashtag #AmessagefromUStoISIS was also used.

The photo was posted again hours later with the message, “we are everywhere”.

And the photo was posted again today with another threat.

Earlier this week The Gateway Pundit reported on ISIS’ vow to one day “raise the flag of Muhammad in the White House.”

Twitter is aiding and abetting Muslim terrorists and allowing them to recruit and terrorize using the Twitter service.

is-warningarticle-2720309-205F597400000578-338_634x369As the jihadists punk Obama government social media follies…and failures.

9th US Circuit Court Judge gives sharia legal consideration in “Innocence of Muslims” ruling

via Florida Family Association.

9th US Circuit Court Chief Judge Alex Kozinski gives legal consideration to Sharia fatwa in amended opinion for en banc hearing of his order to quash YouTube’s First Amendment Right to post anti-Islam film “Innocence of Muslims.”

Click here to send your email asking 43 appellate court judges to reverse 3 judge panel ruling and affirm district court order.

 Florida Family Association sent out several email alerts earlier this year that reported a 3 judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered Google on February 26, 2014 to remove the controversial movie “Innocence of Muslims” from Youtube.com.  The panel voted 2-1 to reverse a lower court order that denied the injunction sought in Cindy Lee Garcia’s law suit.  Garcia sued Google on October 17, 2012 seeking a restraining order that would require Youtube.com to remove “Innocence of Muslims”  from their web service.  Garcia claimed that she had a copyright for a five second video that was incorporated into the film and that she had not given permission for its use in the movie.  She also claimed that she would suffer irreparable harm from an Islamic fatwa if the movie were not removed from access on the World Wide Web.

 Innocence of Muslims” which sparked protests across the Muslim world “depicts Muhammad as a feckless philanderer who approved of child sexual abuse, among other overtly insulting claims that have caused outrage.   In a 13 minute 51 second trailer, the Islamic prophet is made to look like a murderer and adulterer as well” according to TheBlaze.com

 Defendant Google, who owns YouTube, had petitioned the appellate court to hear the case en banc by all of the justices in the 9th US Circuit.   However, the en banc hearing was delayed until now to allow the three judge panel to amend the opinion and dissent.  The court amended the opinion and dissent on July 11, 2014.  This opinion amendment was not posted on the court’s web site until July 24,2014.

9th US Circuit Court Chief Judge Alex Kozinski amended opinion states in part:

 

  • While answering a casting call for a low-budget amateur film doesn’t often lead to stardom, it also rarely turns an aspiring actress into the subject of a fatwa. But that’s exactly what happened to Cindy Lee Garcia when she agreed to act in a film with the working title “Desert Warrior.”
  • These, of course, are fighting words to many faithful Muslims and, after the film aired on Egyptian television, there were protests that generated worldwide news coverage.  An Egyptian cleric issued a fatwa, calling for the killing of everyone involved with the film, and Garcia soon began receiving death threats. She responded by taking a number of security precautions and asking that Google remove the video from YouTube.
  • There’s nothing in the record to suggest that Youssef was in the “regular business” of making films. Reid, 490 U.S. at 752. He’d held many jobs, but there’s no indication he ever worked in the film industry.  And there’s no evidence he had any union contracts, relationships with prop houses or other film suppliers, leases of studio space or distribution agreements.  The dissent would hold that Youssef was in the “regular business” of filmmaking simply because he made “Innocence of Muslims.” But if shooting a single amateur film amounts to the regular business of filmmaking, every schmuck with a video camera becomes a movie mogul.

 Chief Judge Alex Kozinski’s opinion which references the fatwa against Garcia essentially elevates the Sharia law command to censor blasphemy of Muhammad over the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.  This lawsuit would never have happened were it not for the fatwa issued by the Egyptian Imam that ordered the killing of anyone involved in the production of “Innocence of Muslims.”  Garcia did not take legal action until six months after the video was released.  The fatwa is the potential “irreparable harm,” one of four factors required for a restraining order, sited in the appellate court’s opinion for the basis of ordering Google to remove “Innocence of Muslims” from YouTube.  Any restraining order should be focused on the Islamists who want to kill Americans not on Americans who want to exercise their First Amendment Rights.

 Additionally, Chief Judge Alex Kozinski’s opinion prejudicially determines who serious producers are and who are not and elevates the copyrights of “aspiring actresses” over first time producers.  Judge Kozinski’s opinion erroneously discounts the fact that Youseff, the film’s producer paid Garcia, the actress, $500 for her video footage at issue.  Judge Kozinski’s opinion prejudicially establishes that copyrights for amateurs and professionals are different when the court should be establishing equity.

 Chief Judge Alex Kozinski’s opinion could empower Islamists to focus their angst against more actors in videos and perhaps people in photos with the goal of influencing them to demand removal of the same from movies, website posts or blog posts.  The Council on American Islamic Relations’ censorship of American films has been robust lately.  CAIR recently boasted:  CAIR has challenged actual and potential anti-Muslim stereotypes in productions such as ABC Family network’s “Alice in Arabia,” “Executive Decision,” “24,” “The Siege,” “True Lies,” “Rules of Engagement,” “Obsession,” “The Third Jihad,” “Jihad in America,” and “The Sum of All Fears.”

 Now the full 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals will hear the panel’s troubled ruling that was approved by a 2-1 vote.

 Florida Family Association has prepared an email for you to send to the forty three 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals justices urging them to affirm the First Amendment rights that all Americans cherish by reversing the panel’s troubled ruling and affirming the district court’s order.  Florida Family Association is taking a position in this case based upon judicial principle and without regard to the parties involved or content of the movie.

 To send your email, please click the following link, enter your name and email address then click the “Send Your Message” button. You may also edit the subject or message text if you wish.  

 Please click here to send your email to forty three 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals judges.


 Send your email now or after reading FFA’s complete Email issue history.

 

Youtube, Vimeo Enforce Sharia, Delete the “Aisha and Muhammad” Movie

via Vimeo Also Deletes the “Aisha and Muhammad” Movie – Air-Tight Censorship against Criticism of Islam in Western Media.

Those, who are aware of the newly-released movie, “Aisha and Muhammad”, by producer Imran Firasat should already know that Youtube stood in constant and firm vigilance with an iron-whip in hand to strike down any attempt to promote the movie on its website.

Youtube deactivated the first link of the movie within one-and-a-half hours of activation. The second link was deactivated faster that the first. That’s how youtube dealt with Imran Firasat’s movie.

What baflles us most is the fact that youtube fought hard a legal battle to keep the rather shoddily made video, “The Innocence of Muslims”, after one of it actresses, following death-threat from Muslims, initiated a legal proceeding against Youtube after it rejected her request to remove the video on the ground of defending freedom of expression. The protracted legal battle ran on for nearly a year, and in the final court verdict, youtube lost the case a few months ago, and regretfully deleted the video, terming it a bad day for freedom of expression.

Compared to “The Innocence of Muslims”, “Aisha and Muhammad” is much more serious movie based on a much better-researched and better-written story setting with the critical elements of the movie fortified by accompaying references from original and respectable Islamic sources. Moreover, the story in the movie, which is rather grossly and lewedly described in Islamic sources, is presented in a very measured and restrained manner in this movie.

Having advised Imran Firasat on the production of the movie whenever he sought guidance, and seen it multiple times, I am firmly certain that Muslims will never protest, let alone engage in violence, over a movie like this, since it is based on the normative Islamic narratives of the past 14 hundred years. And so far, although various Islamic organizations are talking about insults of the prophet in the movie, are not calling upon the willing followers of Islam to take to the street in protest against it.

Amidst youtube’s resolute censorship of the movie, which has severely limited its reach to the viewers, now vimeo.com, which runs on a paid service platform, has also deleted the movie without any prior consultation with Imran Firasat, despite the fact that he paid for hosting the video on vimeo.com. Only after deleting the movie, they sent him an email to inform about the deletion. Here’s the screenshot of the email Imran Firasat received:

The ground for vimeo.com’s removal of the movie is that it either “harass, incite hatred or depict excessive violence”. Those, who have watched the movie, will clearly know that neither vimeo.com or Muslims will be able to show anything in the movie that harass” anybody, “incite hatred” against anybody or any community, or “depict excessive violence”.

To be noted that LiveLeak and DailyMotion also deleted all the trailers of the movie that Imran Firasat had posted in those sites.

So, that’s the way things seem to go even in the Western world today in the name of censorship about Islam. Vimeo.com (as well as youtube) is violating its own terms and conditions, and guideline, and is instead accusing Imran Firasat of doing the same, who has done absolutely none of that.

We all know that the mainstream western media have for a long time been a pliant servant of Islam, disregarding its responsibility of defending freedom of expression guaranteed in the UN Charter and in the Constitutions of Western nations. And now, even low-key media outlets like Youtube, Google, Facebook, LiveLeak, Daily Motion, and Vimeo etc., which had until now kept a flicker of hope for freedom of expression alive in the West, are also toeing the well-orchestrated Islamist line.

Therefore, freedom of expression, a most cherished human right established in the western world, is all set to die a quick death from the face of the earth, at least as far as its application to Islam is conerned.

 The video can be seen in full here.

Twitter helps Muslims celebrate ‘Month of Jihad’ with new icons

via New Twitter icons help Muslims celebrate Ramadan – Telegraph.

Twitter has launched new hashtag icons for Ramadan and Eid to help 1.5 billion Muslims around the world celebrate the ninth month of the Islamic calendar.

Another feature will help Muslims find out what time each day they can break their fast. From tomorrow they will be able to tweet @AlArabiya with #iftar followed by the name of their city. They will then receive a reply with what time they are allowed to eat. It will also work for #Imsak, or the beginning of the fast.

 Untitled-3_2955682c

Twitter’s Ahmad AbouAmmo said in a blog post announcing the new features: “Use hashtags to tweet how your neighborhood, city or country is celebrating the month and connect with others across the world who are also observing and celebrating Ramadan.”

“Ramadan is an important event around the world — full of celebration, friends and families. We look forward to seeing how many of you come together to share these special moments on Twitter.”

Regular readers here know that Ramadan is the “month of jihad” – according to Muslims themselves.

Facebook Exec to Headline Event at Sharia-Promoting Muslim Groups’ Annual Gala

Creeping while you’re sleeping, via Big Peace.

Facebook Exec to Headline Muslim Advocates’ ‘Countering Hate on the Internet’ Dinner

Increasingly, the war in the information battlespace is being waged outside the hallowed halls of the enemedia. The Islamic supremacist group Muslim Advocates has announced that its Annual Gala 2014 on May 3 will host an “onstage conversation” about “countering hate on the internet” featuring Monika Bickert, the Head of Global Policy Management for Facebook, along with Muslim Advocates’ Executive Director Farhana Khera and Hilary Shelton of the NAACP.

The key to winning this war for freedom is in the war of ideas. So the apparatuses that truth-tellers and voices of freedom including my colleagues and me use, tools such as Facebook, Twitter, and Linkedin, are of cardinal importance. When news from my website AtlasShrugs.com goes viral, invariably it is Facebook that drives it.

This makes sense. Facebook is the personal bulletin board for millions of Americans, on which they share family photos, personal victories or defeats, and news that they believe to be of critical importance. So of course Atlas Shrugs news items would be trafficked there frequently. And that’s why this particular news story about Monika Bickert’s appearance at the Muslim Advocates Annual Gala, although innocuous on its face, is of grave significance.

Islamic supremacists and stealth jihadists are very aware of the ways in which voices of freedom get the word out after having been blacklisted from conventional means of communication and information dissemination. And so these well-funded savages host expensive, silly dinners, galas, and conferences full of empty praise and flattery for clueless tools like Bickert. While Bickert’s name is clearly not on the lips and minds of most Americans, she has the keys to the proverbial kingdom. She is the gatekeeper.

Who exactly is Monika Bickert? As Head of Global Policy Management for Facebook, she is Facebook’s speech police. So is it any wonder that groups like Muslim Advocates would be feting her? Muslim Advocates is an organization of Sharia enforcers, enforcers of the blasphemy laws under Sharia. According to the Investigative Project on Terrorism, in 2011 Khera wrote a letter, also signed by 57 Muslim and allied organizations, to then-Homeland Security Adviser John Brennan, demanding that he create “an interagency task force, led by the White House” to “review all counterterror trainers, so as to purge those that the Muslim organizations, which included many with Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood ties, found unacceptable.” FBI trainers such as Islamic scholar Robert Spencer were summarily dropped.

Khera also demanded that the Obama Administration:

“[P]urge all federal government training materials of biased materials”; “implement a mandatory re-training program for FBI agents, U.S. Army officers, and all federal, state and local law enforcement who have been subjected to biased training”; and more to ensure that only the message about Islam and jihad preferred by the signatories would get through to intelligence and law enforcement agents.

Counter-terror training materials were subsequently scrubbed of all mention of Islam and jihad in connection with terrorism, leaving our law enforcement agents completely unequipped to understand the foremost terror threat of our time.

Groups like these have millions of dollars and an obviously subversive mission, and for them someone like Bickert is a key player. How many of you who are reading this know exactly what I’m talking about? How many of you have been banned from Facebook for twenty-four hours for posting a jihad story or saying something that might offend Muslims? I myself have been banned numerous times for merely posting a link to a jihad article. The well-oiled machine of Islamic supremacists descends daily on Facebook and flags or reports stories that they deem unacceptable for the eyes of the Facebook user and American news consumer.

We cannot abandon Facebook or the other enormously popular social media outlets. We cannot cede the field. The freedom of speech doesn’t mean the freedom to speak in the wilderness, where no one is there to hear us. That’s not what freedom of speech is. Freedom of speech is the protection of all ideas, not just those that global jihadists deem to be Sharia-compliant.

Despite this fictional narrative about a “lucrative Islamophobia industry,” counter-jihad freedom fighters don’t have the funds to fete a tool like Bickert. Only groups like Muslim Advocates do.

These “galas” such as the one that Muslim Advocates is holding should chill you and compel you to action. Many of my colleagues, such as Anders Gravers of Stop Islamisation of Europe (SIOE) have been silenced. His personal Facebook page and organization page have been disabled, shut down, and silenced by these same supremacist cretins.

Most Americans assume that we all share a value system based on freedom and individual rights. But such an assumption can no longer be made. You can’t expect that such freedoms will be automatically protected. We have to fight every single battle. Every attack. We have to counter every hostile attack on our freedoms with an equal or more powerful response. Otherwise, make no mistake: we will lose our freedom of speech. Its continued existence is not guaranteed. Its survival depends on us.


Screen-Shot-2014-04-12-at-1.44.33-AM

As Creeping Sharia noted in 2010 post, the same Farhana Khera of Muslim Advocates also demanded asked the DOJ to start enforcing sharia blasphemy laws in America.

Facebook is notorious for ignoring privacy rights and is a funding a massive campaign to subvert U.S. law through amnesty for illegal aliens, thereby encouraging millions more to illegally enter the U.S. and  further destroy the middle and lower economic classes who bear the brunt of the economic impact.

 

Google’s Gmail blocks Wilders’ anti-Islam sticker mail account

googlecuffs

via DutchNews.nl – Gmail ‘blocks’ Wilders’ anti-Islam sticker mail account. h/t Islamist Watch

Email system Gmail has blocked an account set up by Geert Wilders to distribute an anti-Islam sticker, the Dutch politician claimed on Friday.

‘Unbelievable but Google has blocked the account islamsticker@gmail.com. So Mohammed Rabbae’s complaint was successful,’ Wilders said, using the microblogging service Twitter. He was referring to a complaint about the sticker by a lobby group Landelijk Beraad Marokkanen led by former GroenLinks MP Rabbae.

However, according to tech website Techzine, Google’s systems work largely on automatic pilot and there is a good chance multiple complaints about the address had been received, leading the system to automatically shut it down.

The sticker is a play on the Saudi flag and says in Arabic ‘Islam is a lie. Mohammed is a criminal. The Koran is poison’.

FYI: The new email address is islamsticker@islamsticker.org

Shoebat.com has some background on Wilders’ flag via Geert Wilders targets Saudi Flag and EU simultaneously:

Yesterday, on his blog, Wilders slapped the Saudis while that country was no doubt, busy being outraged at the sweet nuclear deal Iran got courtesy of the Obama administration. Wilders posted his idea for a new Saudi flag and explained why:

The flag of Saudi Arabia proudly proclaims the Shahada or the Islamic declaration of faith: “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.”

In remembrance of the past nine years, in remembrance of the thousands of victims who were murdered in that period by Islamic assassins, in London, in Moscow, in Mumbai, in Nairobi, and in countless other places, and in remembrance of the millions of people – women, apostates, non-Muslims – who daily suffer discrimination and humiliation from the evil ideology of Islam and oppressive Islamic Sharia law, I offer the Islamic world a new flag – a flag with a declaration of truth and liberation: “Islam is a lie, Muhammad a criminal, the Koran is poison.”

Wilders_Saudi_Flag

Just a few short days earlier, Wilders penned an op-ed that appeared in the Wall Street Journal. In it, he essentially predicts that the elections across Europe in May will result in a major defeat for the European Union and victories for patriotism.

Via WSJ:

Here is a tip if you want to ruin the day of the bureaucrats and politicians in Brussels. Just mention next year’s European elections and they will become extremely nervous and agitated. They will fume with anger and warn you about rising populism, a threat to democracy.

Next May’s European elections, in which almost 400 million people in the 28 EU member states will be allowed to cast their votes, will in all likelihood produce a landslide against the Eurocrats. What will manifest itself, however, is not a rise of populism, but a victory for democracy.

For decades, Brussels has been able to do what it pleases. That period is over. People have finally come to realize that so-called europhiles aim to destroy Europe’s nations, the homes of national democracies. And people are not going to let it happen. They are no longer buying the lie that patriotism is dangerous, that it is a vice and not a virtue. They are reasserting their national pride and identity.

Robert Schuman, who was one of the EU’s founding fathers 60 years ago, used to say that the aim of European integration was “to make war not only unthinkable but materially impossible.” But the idea that Germany, France, Britain and other nations in the past went to war because they were sovereign nations is simply ridiculous. They went to war because they had fallen for totalitarian ideologies. Democracies do not go to war against each other; they trade with one another.

In his piece, Wilders refers to the EU as a “prison of nations” and clearly believes that the climate for patriotism is ripe for return all across Europe.

Read it all.

If you haven’t already, stop using Google services.

Long Island: Muslims hack websites on eve of 9/11, post bin Laden videos

via UPDATE: East End Veterinary Emergency & Specialty Center in Riverhead Hacked by Same Group Claiming to Hijack Sag Harbor Village Website Tuesday | The Sag Harbor Express.

By Kathryn G. Menu

UPDATE, 12:50 p.m.: The East End Veterinary Emergency & Specialty Center in Riverhead was hacked Tuesday afternoon by the same group claiming to have hijacked Sag Harbor Village’s website. According to the Facebook page of Fahd Al Murar, whose alias KJ-FIDO claimed responsibility for hacking the village’s webpage, at 12:30 p.m. the vet center’s website, pet-er.com, was also hacked, displaying a different message.

“The website is down by web-soldiers team from Islamic Electronic Army(Alqaeda Army),” reads the webpage. “[Please do not close Page] “Sorry admin just message” Freedom to all Muslims everywhere.”

By 1:30 p.m., the page was restored.

The Village of Sag Harbor’s website, sagharborny.gov, was hijacked Tuesday morning. For roughly a half hour, a six minute video featuring Osama Bin Laden played on the website. According to the page, the site was hijacked by Web Soldiers Team from the Islamic Electronic Army, which referred to itself on the hijacked website as a part of the Al Qaeda Army.

Beneath the video image of Osama Bin Laden, the web page read “KJ-FIDO WAS HERE.”

“the message: we are muslims | we are many | we are strong | if you touch one person from us we will destroy you, your life, your country, your happiness | we launched this event named #OP_USA and #OP_ISRAEL | believe me this is the last time you hear something named Israel !!! FREE PALESTINE | FREE SYRIA | FREE AFGHANISTAN | FREE MUSLIMS,” read the webpage.

According to village officials, Harbor Master Bob Bori discovered the hacking Tuesday morning. By 11:20 a.m. technicians had already taken down the content and were working to restore the website.

By 11:40 p.m. the website was restored, but by noon the content had returned. Technicians again restored the site by 12:30 p.m.

To Muslims, free yourself…from Islam.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 37,255 other followers

%d bloggers like this: