AIG lawsuit: Taxpayer Monies Used to Promote Islamic Jihad

Taxation for Islamization as we like to call it, via Taxpayer Monies Used to Promote Islamic Jihad – Judge Asked to Decide Against AIG Bailout

ANN ARBOR, MI – In a motion for summary judgment filed this week, Federal District Court Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff was asked to enter a judgment against U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and the Federal Reserve Board over the federal government’s bailout of AIG.  The basis for the motion is that over a billion dollars of the bailout went to fund Islamic religious activities in violation of the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor Michigan, and attorney David Yerushalmi filed the lawsuit in December 2008, challenging the AIG bailout on behalf of Kevin Murray, a former Marine who had served in Iraq.  As a taxpayer, Murray objected to being forced to support the propagation of the Islamic jihad which he fought against as a U.S. Marine.

Robert Muise, Senior Trial Lawyer with the Law Center, and David Yerushalmi prepared the motion for summary judgment.  The motion is based on depositions of Treasury officials, affidavits of AIG officials (sealed per court order), answers to interrogatories, and the sworn declarations of two of the nation’s notable experts on Islamic law and terrorism, Stephen C. Coughlin and Robert Spencer.  [Click here to read Summary Judgment motion]

Coughlin, a lawyer and a decorated Army Reserve officer in Military Intelligence, is often cited as the Pentagon’s leading expert on the nexus between Islamic law and jihad.  He concluded that by engaging in Sharia-compliant financing, AIG and the federal government, which now owns 79.9 percent of AIG, are engaging in the religious practice of Islam.

According to Coughlin, Islam inculcates hostility and discrimination against Jews, Christians, and all others who do not accept the Koran as the “word of Allah.”  It is the same law that motivated the 9/11 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 Americans.  [Click here to read Stephen Coughlin’s Declaration]

Robert Spencer has studied Islamic theology and history for thirty years.  He is the Director of Jihad Watch and the author of ten books dealing with Islam.  He has led seminars on Islam and jihad for the U.S. Central Command, the U.S. Command and General Staff College, the Joint Terrorism Task Force, and the U.S. intelligence community.

According to Spencer, by engaging in its Sharia-compliant financing and business practices,  AIG is engaging in religious behavior that inculcates hatred and discrimination against Jews, Christians, and all other non-Muslims.

Spencer states that in abetting the spread of Sharia-compliant financing, AIG and the federal government are abetting the same legal system that  motivated the murder of nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11.  [Click here to read Robert Spencer’s Declaration]

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, commented, “It’s outrageous that the federal government is the owner of a corporation engaged in a business with interests adverse to the United States.  We filed this lawsuit not only to defend constitutional principles, but also to defend our national security.  It’s clear we can’t leave the job of protecting America to the Washington politicians.”

The federal lawsuit challenged that portion of the “Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008” (EESA) that appropriated billions in taxpayer money to fund and financially support the federal government’s majority ownership interest in AIG, which engages in Shariah-based Islamic religious activities that are anti-American, anti-Christian, and anti-Jewish.

According to the lawsuit, AIG, which is now a government owned company, engages in Sharia-compliant financing which subjects certain financial activities, including investments, to the dictates of Islamic law and the Islamic religion.  This specifically includes any profits or interest obtained through such financial activities.  AIG itself describes “Sharia” as “Islamic law based on the Quran and the teachings of the Prophet [Mohammed].”

According to the lawsuit, “The use of these taxpayer funds to approve, promote, endorse, support, and fund these Sharia-based Islamic religious activities violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.”

Judge Zatkoff, in an earlier decision, denied the request by the Obama administration’s Department of Justice to dismiss the lawsuit.  In his ruling, the judge held that the lawsuit sufficiently alleged a federal constitutional challenge to the use of taxpayer money to fund AIG’s Islamic religious activities.  The court noted:

Times of crisis, however, do not justify departure from the Constitution.  In this case, the United States government has a majority interest in AIG.  AIG utilizes consolidated financing whereby all funds flow through a single port to support all of its activities, including Sharia-compliant financing.  Pursuant to the EESA, the government has injected AIG with tens of billions of dollars, without restricting or tracking how this considerable sum of money is spent.  At least two of AIG’s subsidiary companies practice Sharia-compliant financing, one of which was unveiled after the influx of government cash.  After using the $40 billion from the government to pay down the $85 billion credit facility, the credit facility retained $60 billion in available credit, suggesting that AIG did not use all $40 billion consistent with its press release.  Finally, after the government acquired a majority interest in AIG and contributed substantial funds to AIG for operational purposes, the government co-sponsored a forum entitled “Islamic Finance 101.”  These facts, taken together, raise a question of whether the government’s involvement with AIG has created the effect of promoting religion and sufficiently raise Plaintiff’s claim beyond the speculative level, warranting dismissal inappropriate at this stage in the proceedings.

With the aid of taxpayer funds provided by Congress, AIG employs a “Shariah Supervisory Committee,” which is comprised of the following members: Sheikh Nizam Yaquby from Bahrain, Dr. Mohammed Ali Elgari from Saudi Arabia, and Dr. Muhammed Imran Ashraf Usmani from Pakistan.  Dr. Usmani is the son, student, and dedicated disciple of Mufti Taqi Usmani, who is the leading Sharia authority for Sharia-compliant finance in the world and the author of a book translated into English in 1999 that includes an entire chapter dedicated to explaining why a Western Muslim must engage in violent jihad against his own country or government.

According to AIG, the role of its Shariah authority “is to review our operations, supervise its development of Islamic products, and determine Shariah compliance of these products and our investments.”

Backstories here:

Paulson, Fed sued over AIG sharia bailout

Lawsuit alleging taxpayer bailout of AIG’s sharia activities can proceed

9 thoughts on “AIG lawsuit: Taxpayer Monies Used to Promote Islamic Jihad

  1. That is wonderful! My favorite part….. .”Times of crisis, however, do not justify departure from the Constitution”

  2. My God what has come of this country, is our so called Obama change went to far, I think so,I believe he is undermining the USA for the Muslims. Their is a great plot behind all this, why cant smeone standup, like the news media and tell it like it is, FOX did, my hat is off to FOX. Jihad, terrorist, are words the govt lackeys are not allowed to use aymore. But I will, I am a combat veteran and proud of that. PLEASE WAKE-UP AMERICA

  3. I totally agree that we MUST stay the course and fight like hell…sorry I am mad as that and DO NOT WANT TO SEE OUR NATION HAVE TO PUT UP WITH SUCH ANYMORE…..IT IS JUST OUTRAGEOUS AND SO ARE THOSE THAT CONDONE SUCH TREASON!!!!!! I am with all of you that are fighting this! I live right in the middle of the takeover by illegals of my town,,,it is sickening, they have absolutely ruined my home town and it makes me more than mad!!!! It once was a really nice place to live but over 75% of the town is taken over and trashed by mexicans, of which 95% of that are illegal and no one does anything about them!!!! It is an outrage of huge proportions….they are rude, not appreciative of the things they are taking and want more and moe…they have a big chip on their shoulders of entiltement that is absurd..who do they think they are anyway! I do not go into businesses where they allow them to work and it is causing us in America to dislike all mexicans, even if they are legal because most of them side with the illegals, which is obnoxious…and totally wrong!!! I am SO angry at the people who have let this just go on and go on and have not stopped the invasion of mexico into America…it is just against everything that this nation is about and a mockery to ALL immigrants that built our nation from day one…the difference is they just do not get it; why they are not welcome, wanted or necessary in any way here….we did just fine when they were channeled into the agriculture area and that was it!!! Illegal is illegal and they have no rights what-so-ever except to be treated humanly as their butts are kicked back acrossed the border to stay and stop re-arresting the same ones over and over, to continue costing this nation untold amounts of money and aggrevation…then there are the ones that are drug dealers and terrorists…..and killers!!!!!! AZ is standing firm to rid our nation of this travisty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  4. Folks: the next big revolution is to stand against the Muslims and their intent to take all they can for Islam…..they are the worst enemy of all, as they are sneaky and they have money backing them….we cannot let them get any more a foot hold than they HAve…ah–well when you consider they are all over WA, I guess we are in the middle of that mess too…Obama is one of them and condones and honors them; good heavens people we ARE a Christian found nation and we have GOT to get the cobwebs out and take a stand not matter what it takes….hopefully we can stand and take it all without blood…but God Bless American and pass the ammo…we have GOT to stand for our nation, our flag, our freedom, liberty, our heritage and people or we will live in the hell that Europe has and is once again…..backbone, courage, strength, FAITH, morals, honor, liberty and good old fashioned American pioneering spirit…..GOD BLESS AMERICA AGAIN AND WE, THE PATRIOTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  5. “If taxes are laid upon us without our having a legal representation where they are laid, we are reduced from the character of free subjects to the state of tributary slaves.” – Sam Adams

    “tributary slaves” . . . of allah? Hell NO!

    For the love of irony, wouldn’t you know it – a US MARINE is the one to take charge of this battle -YET AGAIN!! God bless Kevin Murray, Thomas More Law Center and David Yerushalmi. May the almighty see to it that America remains sovereign and prevails (yet again) over the depredations of Islam.

  6. Pingback: Our Taxpayer Dollars Promoting Jihad? Test case – First Amendment’s Establishment Clause? — Act For America Omaha Chapter

  7. Pingback: Taxpayer Dollars Promoting Jihad? | Omaha, NE Chapter

  8. Pingback: What’s Behind the Negative Characterization of Muslims? | Becket Fund

  9. Pingback: What's Behind the Negative Characterization of Muslims? | ISPU

If sharia law continues spreading, you'll have less and less freedom of speech - so speak while you can!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.