Key Muslim witness in anti-Muslim hearings fails to condemn jihadi rhetoric

Jon Kyl may be retiring but he hasn’t left the building yet. via Alana Goodman at Contentions, Contentions Inappropriate?:

One of stranger moments of Sen. Dick Durbin’s hearing on “Protecting the Civil Rights of American Muslims,” came today when Sen. Jon Kyl’s began questioning Farhana Khera, the executive director of Muslim Advocates, about whether she would condemn death threats against other minorities – and Khera seemed to try to filibuster out of answering the question:

Kyl: I wonder if you’ve made any public pronouncement or statement condemning those religious leaders who’ve employed violent or hateful rhetoric or promoted hateful views of other’s religious groups. Have you done that or has your website done that?

Khera: Well let me, maybe by way of background, just clarify…

Kyl: As a former staffer you know that my time is very limited. I don’t have a lot for background. I have three quick questions here, have you done that?

Khera: Well let me just clarify Sen. Kyl, my organization’s work is focused on protecting and upholding our constitutional values.

Kyl: So you haven’t condemned the hateful speech of those who have criticized others in the way that I mentioned then.

Khera: I guess I would have to know more specifically which particular case you’re talking about.

Kyl: Let me just ask you this. Would you today criticize threats of death or physical harm directed at writers or commentators who’ve criticized Islamic extremism? You would condemn that today, would you not?

Khera: I think we have, in our country, very cherished fidelity to the first amendment and that includes the freedom of speech –

Kyl: I’m not questioning whether people have the right to speak. The question is whether you would agree that that speech is helpful or hurtful, whether you would condemn it or be neutral about it.

Khera: Those who would threaten to kill somebody because of their political views, religious views – that’s inappropriate.

Inappropriate? For someone whose job is to combat religious discrimination, that seems like somewhat of an understatement. It contrasted with Khera’s passionate denunciation of discrimination against Muslims during her testimony, which she called “a growing menace to the safety and social fabric of our nation,” that is “so vile,” and “has real life and death consequences for Muslim, Arab, Sikh and South Asian Americans and their families.”

Typical, not strange. Hat tip to Powerline.

In 2009, Khera’s group taught Muslims how to fulfill Islamic charitable funding ‘without drawing attention of the FBI’. Just saying.

4 thoughts on “Key Muslim witness in anti-Muslim hearings fails to condemn jihadi rhetoric

  1. If American muslims are not speaking out against Jihad send them to a country that has sharia law. They don’t belong in a free country.

  2. Another good example of a MUSLIM ASS LICKER helping SHARIE LAW to continue CREEPING INTO OUR LAWS and DESTROYING THE CONSTITUTION OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY. DERBIN is nothing more than a TURN COAT in our day like BENIDICT ARNOLD was in 1776. LOCK and LOAD.

If sharia law continues spreading, you'll have less and less freedom of speech - so speak while you can!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.