Study: 81% of US Mosques Promote Jihad


In 84.5% of the mosques, the imam recommended studying violence-positive texts.

A study we’ve referenced numerous times (see the Mapping Sharia link on left sidebar) is about to be released and Andrew Bostom writing at Big Peace has some details, 81% of US Mosques Promote Jihad:

During August 2007, the New York City Police Department (NYPD) released “Radicalization in the West — The Homegrown Threat.” This insightful 90-page report evaluated the threat that had become apparent since 9/11/2001, analyzing the roots of recent terror plots in the United States, from Lackawanna in upstate New York to Portland, Ore., to Fort Dix, NJ. Based upon these case-study analyses of individuals arrested for jihadist activity, the authors concluded that the “journey” of radicalization that produces homegrown jihadists began in so-called “Salafist” (“fundamentalist” to non-Muslims) mosques characterized by high levels of Sharia—Islamic Law—adherence. The landmark study just published, “Sharia and Violence in American Mosques” (Kedar M, Yerushalmi D. The Middle East Quarterly, Summer 2011, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 59-72) sought to expand considerably upon the NYPD’s post-hoc, case study approach—systematically gathering objective survey data, with much greater methodological rigor—and address these two a priori questions: I) Is there a robust association between observable measures of religious devotion, coupled to Sharia-adherence in US mosques, and the presence of violence-sanctioning materials at these mosques?; and II) Is there a robust association between the presence of violence-sanctioning materials at a mosque, and the advocacy of jihadism by the mosque’s leadership via recommending the study of these materials, or other manifest behaviors?

Full details of the sampling methodology, extracts of representative jihad promoting materials (texts), and specific Sharia-compliant behaviors recorded, are provided in the accompanying appendices, reproduced from the full study (which will be available here 6/6/11). In brief, survey data were collected from a nationally representative, random statistical sample of 100 US mosques, covering 14 states, and the District of Columbia. This concise overview of the basic data collection procedures—including a self-critical, honest caveat by the authors about “completeness” of the available information on US mosque locations—is reproduced verbatim from the report (p. 68):

A surveyor visited a subject mosque in order: (a) to observe and record 12 Sharia-adherent behaviors of the worshipers and the imam (or lay leader); (b) to observe whether the mosque contained the selected materials rated as moderate and severe; (c) to observe whether the mosque contained materials promoting, praising, or supporting violence or violent jihad; and (d) to observe whether the mosque contained materials indicating the mosque had invited guest speakers known to have promoted violent jihad. Thus, the survey only examined the presence of Sharia-adherent behaviors, the presence of violence positive materials in mosques, whether an imam would promote the study of violence-positive materials, and whether a mosque was used as a forum to promote violent jihad. Since there is no central body to which all mosques belong, it was difficult to ascertain that the sampling universe list was complete. This may have introduced bias into the sampling although the authors find no evidence of any systemic distortions.

The study’s results provide clear—and ominous—affirmative answers to the a priori questions posed. Sharia-adherence was strongly associated with the presence of jihad-violence sanctioning materials, and the presence of jihad-violence sanctioning materials was in turn robustly associated with advocacy of jihadism by mosque imams—religious leaders. This key summary finding was highlighted by the authors:

…51 percent of mosques had texts that either advocated the use of violence in the pursuit of a Shari‘a-based political order or advocated violent jihad as a duty that should be of paramount importance to a Muslim; 30 percent had only texts that were moderately supportive of violence like the Tafsir Ibn Kathir and Fiqh as-Sunna; 19 percent had no violent texts at all.

Thus 81% of this statistical sample representative of US mosques were deemed as moderately (30%) to highly (51%) supportive of promulgating jihad violence to impose Shari’a.

Additional profoundly troubling findings emerge when the data are explored in depth beyond these summary observations. For example, only 4.7% of Muslim worshippers attended mosques where jihadist materials were not provided because Sharia-compliant mosques promoting jihad were the most heavily attended. The authors also describe these specific details indicating that the preponderance of US mosques sanction jihad terrorism and its ultimate goal of a Caliphate (i.e., the transnational imposition of strict Islamic law in current Muslim nations, and ultimately global imposition of Islamic Law, including in the US), if one includes advocacy of financial support for this sacralized violence (from pp. 67-69).

The survey found a strong correlation between the presence of severe violence-promoting literature and mosques featuring written, audio, and video materials that actually promoted such acts. By promotion of jihad, the study included literature encouraging worshipers to engage in terrorist activity, to provide financial support to jihadists, and to promote the establishment of a caliphate in the United States. These materials also explicitly praised acts of terror against the West; praised symbols or role models of violent jihad; promoted the use of force, terror, war, and violence to implement the

Sharia; emphasized the inferiority of non-Muslim life; promoted hatred and intolerance toward non-Muslims or notional Muslims; and endorsed inflammatory materials with anti-U.S. views… [O]f the 51 mosques that contained severe materials, 100 percent were led by imams who recommended that worshipers study texts that promote violence.

[M]osques containing violence positive materials were substantially more likely to include materials promoting financial support of terror than mosques that did not contain such texts. A disturbing 98 percent of mosques with severe texts included materials promoting financial support of terror. Those with only moderate rated materials on site were not markedly different, with 97 percent providing such materials.

These results were comparable when using other indicators of jihad promotion. Thus, 98 percent of mosques that contained severe-rated literature included materials promoting establishing an Islamic caliphate in the United States as did 97 percent of mosques containing only moderate rated materials.

These are the hard data that make plain why the “see no Sharia in America” mindslaughter redolent across the political spectrum amongst our policymaking, academic, and journalistic elites, is so dangerously delusive.

Here’s the abstract from Mapping Sharia’s report:


random survey of 100 representative mosques in the U.S. was conducted to measure the correlation between Sharia adherence and dogma calling for violence against non-believers.  Of the 100 mosques surveyed, 51% had texts on site rated as severely advocating violence; 30% had texts rated as moderately advocating violence; and 19% had no violent texts at all.  Mosques that presented as Sharia adherent were more likely to feature violence-positive texts on site than were their non-Sharia-adherent counterparts.  In 84.5% of the mosques, the imam recommended studying violence-positive texts.  The leadership at Sharia-adherent mosques was more likely to recommend that a worshipper study violence-positive texts than leadership at non-Sharia-adherent mosques.  Fifty-eight percent of the mosques invited guest imams known to promote violent jihad.  The leadership of mosques that featured violence-positive literature was more likely to invite guest imams who were known to promote violent jihad than was the leadership of mosques that did not feature violence-positive literature on mosque premises.

RelatedWhat is a Mosque?

15 thoughts on “Study: 81% of US Mosques Promote Jihad

  1. our government is sitting on its obama they know its going on they are here to overthrow our government yet they do nothing.I would vote for the next president if his agenda was stop Islam taking over america.

  2. Think there is no danger, why not ask Melvin Bledsoe. He is the father of Abdul Hakim Mujahid Muhammad who killed an Army Recruiter in 2009. Here is what he had to say 10 March 2011 to the Homeland Security Committee:
    Spread the word about Islam and it’s teachings. Sharia Law is not for the Modern Free World but it is creeping in all around us. It needs to be stopped before it is too late. England is almost at the turning point, the US is about 10 years behind that at the current rate if nothing is done to change things.


  4. I have it on the best of sources (I, like mohammad, dreamed it) that the remaining 19% will do their best to come up to standards, even if it kills them!

  5. Autumn Air
    P: (714) 744-4432
    F: (714) 744-4486
    Subject: HB 1388 passed!
    Can this be true ????
    Is there no end???
    HB 1388 PASSED
    You just spent $20,000,000 to move members/supporters of Hamas, a terrorist
    organization, to the United States; housing, food, transportation, the
    whole enchilada.
    HB 1388 PASSED
    Whether you are an Obama fan, or not, EVERYONE IN THE U.S. Needs to know….
    H.R. 1388 was passed, behind our backs. You may want to read about it…
    It wasn’t mentioned on the news… Just went by on the ticker tape at the
    bottom of the CNN screen.
    Obama funds $20M in tax payer dollars to immigrate Hamas Refugees to the USA
    . This is the news that did not, and will not, make the headlines.
    By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the expenditure of
    $20.3 million in “migration assistance” to the Palestinian refugees and
    “conflict victims” in Gaza .
    The “presidential determination” (ain’t that nice?) which allows hundreds of
    thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the United
    States, was signed and appears in the Federal Register.
    Few on Capitol Hill, or in the media, took note that the order provides a
    free ticket replete with housing, transportation and food allowances to
    individuals who have displayed their overwhelming support to the Islamic
    Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the parliamentary election of January 2006.
    Now we learn that he is allowing thousands of Palestinian refugees to move
    to, and live in, the US at American taxpayer expense.
    These important, and insightful, issues are being “lost” in the blinding
    bail-outs and “stimulation” packages.
    Doubtful? To verify this for


    Friends, WE are losing this country at a rapid pace.

    Patrick J. Hughes U.S.M.C. ChuLai 67-68
    Rolling Thunder Inc. National Photographer
    610-529-6440 Cell
    God Bless and Help America!!

  6. The Turkish Govt used to have microphones (and cameras in some) in every single mosque in the country in order to prevent Sharia from being taught and spread. This worked for a very long time, until recently when an Islamist extremist was elected to lead Turkey. Bye bye Turkey, heading back to the barbaric ages now.

    Im sure that there would be a lot of screaming about freedom of religion if microphones were tried to place in every mosque in the USA, but freedom of religion does NOT extend to teaching Jihad, sorry.

    Even when preaching Jihad IS practiced and KNOWN about in the USA, it takes years of legal wrangling to get anything done to stop even ONE person, it’s useless, and often doesn’t even succeed.

    So now what? Is it coming down to every citizen in every town across America to take the law into their own hands to stop the encroachment of this barbaric system into their neighborhoods?

  7. Pingback: Why Won’t Trump Shut Down The Masjid Nur Al-Islam Mosque? – Dave Levine Online

If sharia law continues spreading, you'll have less and less freedom of speech - so speak while you can!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.