Another crescent and star behind the Flight 93 Memorial

A commenter on this post, The Flight 93 Memorial mosque (must see videos), found another company involved in the master design of the giant outdoor mosque – that memorializes Islam rather than the victims of Flight 93. David Langdon has a large presence in the Middle East, and a crescent-star-like logo.

From Facebook:

Davis Langdon USA The Flight 93 National Memorial in Somerset, Pennsylvania, has won a National Park Service merit award. Davis Langdon had assisted Paul Murdoch Architects in complete design stage cost consulting beginning with the master plan of the memorial’s design.

Davis Langdon has worked on the high-profile projects, The Shard, the Qatar-funded, tallest skyscraper in Western Europe.


15 thoughts on “Another crescent and star behind the Flight 93 Memorial

  1. The National Park Service, as directed by our Muslim President, has approved a memorial that remembers the attackers, not the victims. It is a symbol of victory by the attackers, the Muslims. It is a characteristic they have exhibited to exploit victory, from Jerusalem to conquests in North Africa and Spain. since their first victories under Mohammed in the 7th century. They now want to do this same expression of victory by building a mosque on Ground Zero in Manhattan.

  2. I truly believe that the leadership of this country is Muslim. Therefore, of course they are instrumental in erecting these monuments to the victory they feel that Islam won when they killed thousands of innocent people on that fateful day. Islam makes no difference between warriors and innocent people. The only distinction they make is between Muslaims and those whom they consider to be infidels. IMO it is they who are pagan infidels. They have no morals, culture, ambition and they do not want the world to be better. They want the world to regress to the seventh century and for all of us to live as they live in their God forsaken desert dictatorships. That is what awaits us, friend, if we do not vote these barbarians out of office at the next election cycle. Otherwise, we are lost.

    • Why are we waiting to vote them out of office on 2012, when we should have been IMPEACHING THEM LONG AGO. Behner has NO GUTS TO START THIS PROCESS as he is afraid to OFFEND SOME ONE. Wake up AMERICA and go after your Congressman to call for IMPEACHMENT NOW!!!!

      • Why Obama cannot be impeached
        September 11th, 2011
        By Aaron Cantor USAF (ret) ©

        ——————————————————————————–

        In my previous column, I called for impeachment, but I was wrong, as has been explained to me by the words of a Harvard educated Constitutional Lawyer with 30 years of experience before the Supreme Court of the United States.
        Thank G-d I found this material!
        Let me quote Dr. Edwin Vieira, who wrote about this back in December 2008 before Obama was “sworn” into office:
        If Obama is not “a natural born Citizen” or has renounced such citizenship, he is simply not eligible for “the Office of President” (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). That being so, he cannot be “elected” by the voters, by the Electoral College, or by the House of Representatives (see Amendment XII). For neither the voters, nor the Electors, nor members of the House can change the constitutional requirement, even by unanimous vote inter sese (see Article V). If, nonetheless, the voters, the Electors, or the members of the House purport to “elect” Obama, he will be nothing but a usurper, because the Constitution defines him as such. And he can never become anything else, because a usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation.

        If Obama dares to take the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office, knowing that he is not “a natural born Citizen,” he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). For, being ineligible for “the Office of President,” he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,” or even execute it at all, to any degree. Thus, his very act of taking the “Oath or Affirmation” will be a violation thereof! So, even if the chief justice of the Supreme Court himself looks the other way and administers the “Oath or Affirmation,” Obama will derive no authority whatsoever from it.
        Third, his purported “Oath or Affirmation” being perjured from the beginning, Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped “Office of President” will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242.

        If Obama does become an usurper posturing as “the President,” Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see Article II, Section 4).
        For those who think Dr. Vieira Jr., Ph.D., J.D., is just some run-of-the-mill attorney, let me give you a very condensed bio: He holds four degrees from Harvard. For more than 30 years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States , he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson and Communications Workers of America v. Beck. His two volume tome, “Pieces of Eight: The Monetary Powers and Disabilities of the United States Constitution,” is the most comprehensive study in existence of American monetary law and history viewed from a constitutional perspective.
        Despite all the noise out there by Obama’s supporters, it is crystal clear the putative president was born with dual citizenship and is forever ineligible to be president.
        Obama seized the office of president through fraud. As a usurper, he’s never held office. That’s what the word usurp means: to seize and hold (a position, office, power, etc.) by force or without legal right. Since he legally has never occupied the White House as president, he cannot be impeached.
        Now, when this is pointed this out countless times to groups demanding impeachment, the response is: I don’t care – we just have to get him out.
        Those are people who proudly proclaim they only want to see the U.S. Constitution upheld. Those are people who state unequivocally that the usurper was never eligible to run because he’s not a natural born citizen under the U.S. Constitution.
        You can’t have it both ways. In essence, what those folks are saying is we can do the same thing as Obama and his coconspirators: circumvent the Constitution.

        But, the usurper has committed crimes while in office! Indeed, he has and continues to do so. Knowing he was not eligible to run, the putative president solicited campaign donations to the tune of about $700 million dollars. He can still be indicted for wire fraud.
        Those who demand his impeachment are asking to set one of the worst legal precedents in our history: Any constitutionally ineligible thug can come along and buy his way into the White House. We’ll just impeach him later!

        To impeach would also accomplish this: Every piece of legislation he’s signed into law would remain on the books. Let me quote Dr. Vieira one more time:
        “Perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President.” The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to a usurper posturing as “the President of the United States ,” but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.”

        Besides removing a usurper from office, that should be our second-highest consideration and why the outlaw Congress hasn’t moved against him. All 535 of them allowed this to happen, and now it’s gone so far; they don’t have the courage to take on the mess they’ve made.
        The usurper can be indicted once out of office, but Will he ever be indicted for his crimes? With enough public pressure, it can happen because his handlers would simply throw him under the bus as a liability.
        There will be a massive push to keep the putative president off the ballot in dozens of states. It will come from candidates who understand the process discussed in my column above. Mark my words, what’s coming will be a nightmare for the DNC and Obama’s handlers. Time is running out for them to find another viable candidate; something will have to give. One way or the other, Obama’s crimes are going to catch up with him, but please stop working toward setting the wrong legal precedent. It’s beyond frustrating, I know, but either we live our words in supporting the U.S. Constitution or we take the wrong road opening the door for another ineligible candidate with enough money and corrupt individuals behind him to seize the office of president.
        Go to this link for her article. http://www.devvy.com/new_site/quo-follow-up-051211.html
        basically devvy says:
        I believe you can understand and possibly agree, that time and dismissals points to the Quo Warranto as the only legal remedy to remove Obama/Soetoro from office.

        http://www.eyesonwashington.com

  3. Side note: I uncovered a vintage wood toy that was made back in the 1950’s from family items that is a pull toy on 4 red wheels under a green platform. On top of the platform is colorful clown holding a small bell (that would ring when the wheels turned) and an elephant positioned directly behind the clown. This elephant has a red cover (much like a saddle rug) on its back with a crescent and a star just like Islams Mecca insignia. Wow that is a nearly 60 year old toy!

  4. REMEMBER;The Bin Ladin Family made their billions from tall building super structures and.TAKING TAKE OF MECCA.MAYBE IT’S;OUR TALL BUILDINGS ARE S.U.P.E.R.I.O.R TO YOURS!Perhaps they should all go ‘swimming’ in Lake Superior?I wish the Japanese would have listened and gotten themselves away from the coast and applies salt with iodine to thier skin.

  5. Best protest-STAY AWAY IN DROVES. Turn the place into a ghost town. No vandalism to the site as this disgraces those who fought and continue to fight against islam.

  6. The shape of the crescent moon does not belong to Islam: the moon belongs to us all. I refuse to concede that to the enemy. There’s no star in the memorial; the crescent alone is not damning, and can be seem as comforting arms enfolding the crash site in a hug.

    It’s a cemetery, and they unveiled headstones for the dead on Saturday. I think that pretty much precludes it being a mosque.

    Not everything is a conspiracy, and by claiming to see dhimmism everywhere, you make us blind to it when it really does appear. Be a little more judicious. Fight the Ground Zero Mosque– at least that one’s real!

  7. Instead of a crescent moon design, I want to see a cross that depicts
    the symbol of Christianity for salvation is only thru Jesus Christ our Lord.
    God bless those that hear and accept the word of God. Brothers &
    Sisters God loves all of us which is why He gave His only begotten Son
    (The Sinless One) ,Jesus Christ as a sacrifice for our sins(John3:16).

  8. No Muslim decor should disgrace any hallowed ground. The people of the nation might do just what was done in TN and blow up the thing. Muslims are murderers and deserve no respect. The nation should be told of this, congress should act and act now. This is disgraceful. To have it blown up and the Quran destroyed at the same time wuolld be great. We owe those people nothing

  9. Pingback: Another crescent and star behind the Flight 93 Memorial « Windsor, CO ACT! For America

If sharia law continues spreading, you'll have less and less freedom of speech - so speak while you can!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s