NYT confirms Islam a violent religion, runs anti-Catholic ad but won’t run identical anti-Islam ad

via Atlas ShrugsREJECTED! What the NY Times WON’T Run: Counter-Jihad Facts What the NY Times Will Run: Anti-Catholic Smear Ads

Did you see the virulently anti-Catholic ad that ran in the New York Times last week? That ad inspired AFDI/SIOA, in cooperation with SION (Stop Islamization of Nations), to create the same ad but for one thing: different religion. The craven quislings at the New York Times rejected our ad.

Bob Christie, Senior Vice President of Corporate Communications for the New York Times, just called me to advise me that they would be accepting my ad, but considering the situation on the ground in Afghanistan, now would not be a good time, as they did not want to enflame an already hot situation. They will be reconsidering it for publication in “a few months.”

So I said to Mr. Christie, “Isn’t this the very point of the ad? If you feared the Catholics were going to attack the New York Times building, would you have run that ad?”

Mr. Christie said, “I’m not here to discuss the anti-Catholic ad.”

I said, “But I am, it’s the exact same ad.”

He said, “No, it’s not.”

I said, “I can’t believe you’re bowing to this Islamic barbarity and thuggery. I can’t believe this is the narrative. You’re not accepting my ad. You’re rejecting my ad. You can’t even say it.”

We used the same language as the anti-Catholic ad. The only difference is, ours was true and what we describe is true. The anti-Catholic ad was written by fallacious feminazis.

It is most disingenous for the New York Times to refuse to run our counter-jihad ad based on their “concern for US troops in Afghanistan.” Liars. Who has done more to jeopardize our troops and American citizens  than the pro-jihadist New York Times? They are notorious for their treasonous reportage.

We protested their treason.

The New York Times leaked FISA and admitted that they released this information knowing that it would damage national security. Porter Goss told the Senate at that time that the New York Times leaks had damaged our intelligence gathering capability, and in so doing, our national security.

The NY Times exposed a “highly classified Pentagon order” authorizing Special Operations forces to hunt al-Qaida leaders in mountains of Pakistan. The New York Times exposed SWIFT (which put military and civilians at great risk of jihad). SWIFT was a legal secret program that gave the government access to a massive database of international financial transactions, using “broad subpoenas to collect the financial records from an international system.”

 “President Bush is concerned that once again The New York Times has chosen to expose a classified program that is working to protect our citizens.” (here)

But they have no reservation submitting to the bloody demands of sharia. This is surrender to savagery.

TEXT of ads and more at Atlas Shrugs website. If you missed yesterday’s posts, check out this video that helps explain this lunacy: Islamophilia in U.S. media, education and government intelligence (video).

12 thoughts on “NYT confirms Islam a violent religion, runs anti-Catholic ad but won’t run identical anti-Islam ad

  1. We have a long running satirical magazine in Britain, founded in the early Sixties and still going strong called Private Eye. (It has an edited on-line edition if you’re interested in seeing what it’s all about.)

    It’s editor, Ian Hislop also appears on a weekly comedy programme, Have I Got News For You and is forthright, pretty much unbiased politically and can be generally relied upon to pithily intercede when the going gets slushy with meaningless pc platitude.

    Following the Cartoon riots and the shameful display of Muslim barbarism during the London demonstration in which every known way of inflicting death upon the kuffar was displayed on their brandished posters, he posited his view.

    Asked why that not one British Media outlet had printed the cartoons and that included his own, he replied, ‘we don’t want to get bombed’. It was as simple as that.

    His breath of fresh air honesty so missing from the liberal media such as our BBC, Guardian and Independent seems to elude that so called paragon of virtuous reporting, The Grey Lady.

    They are so far up their own pompous left wing fundaments, it seems that honesty is a trait which can only be defined by themselves and no matter what overwhelming evidence, the multicultural and cultural relativity line has to be pursued.

    Their reductive blindness will only see three pecking orders.



    Western/Non Western.

    That this total absurdity post 9/11 has expanded to include Muslim/Non Muslim is as evident as can be and Pamela’s testing the water experiment has exposed the sham of level playing field brilliantly.

    Objectivity so lauded by these foul hypocrites has become a mirage and has genuinely entered a territory previously occupied by the bleak totalitarian visions of Franz Kafka and George Orwell.

    That their work is acknowledged as dystopian fiction and the so called objectivity of liberal media, fact has to be the biggest fiction of the lot.

    It poses under a nome de plume known as the ‘narrative’ in which a herd of political newsmen conjure up a line and the rest, lemming-like follow. If that includes the death of their very own culture which enables the freedom to tell the truth, so be it.

    Picture that endless snake, devouring it’s own tail and you’re in the ball park.

    To quote Lenin in politically opposite but similar circumstances, ‘What is to be done?’

    • What’s to be done indeed! That Private Eye exists surprises me, for the news coming out of Merry England is anything but comforting.

      It seems, to me at least, that Brits have arrived at a point where they must ask themselves the question: Do we just cave in; hand these inbred, 7th century thugs the keys to our country; or do we say ‘enough’, and take our country back?

      That Britain has a terrible problem was exemplified by the atrociously naiive and terminally stupid behaviour exhibited by a BBC reporter, Stacey Dooley, who returned to her native Luton to see if there really was a ‘problem with islam!!’

  2. Peter

    All is not lost.

    We, as in America are betrayed by a PC obsessed political establishment and compliant media but talk to the man on the street and it’s a different tale.

    Our current PM Cameron chases the swing voter rather than appealing to the core.

    Muslims traditionally vote Labour whose immigration policies under Blair and Brown allowed around a million of these ingrates in.

    Cameron’s reasoning is make nice to this voter bloc and they’ll tick his box come next election.

    It’s as simple as that.

    But when the chips are really down and people are feeling not so feel good, resentment brews.

    The backlash is building and comment on blogs exposes a growing resentment against the hordes of unintegrated Muslims and their constant whining demands.

    Europe is facing the mother of all battles and as the EU collapses under the weight of its own impossibility an anti establishment force is mobilising.

    Expect rioting in Greece, Italy and Spain. Major demonstrations in Ireland, Denmark, The Netherlands and France. Chaos as embedded politicos fight to retain power against democratic will.

    It, as we say here, is going tits up and the Islamisation of our once cherished democracies will be curtailed one way or another.

    Brievik’s solution was a grossly extreme demonstration of a mind which snapped. There are many who share his sentiment if not his means.

    We are living through history and one day the Quislings will be exposed just as ‘Peace in our time’, Chamberlain is reviled as a clueless appeasor.

    Has that singing fat lady just entered the stage?

    • Thanks for the answer Logdon, you’ve given me new hope! Interesting that you named Anders Breivik; while of course I don’t know the man, it’s perfectly clear why he did what he did–as you pointed out, he’d had enough, and just snapped. Yet of all the bloggers, reporters, journalists etc., only Takuan Seiyo and I cut the man any slack–everyone else labelled him a dangerous madman; but in fact most psychiatrists have declared him quite sane.

      I’m familiar with the situation in Norway, having worked there, married one, and of course speak the language, and I’m happy to tell you the situation is the same there, i.e. the average Norwegian loathes and detests the muslim rabble infesting their country, and a future battle is brewing there too. Also agree that massive violence is coming to Europe, for it is not enough to merely quell islamic violence, if Europe is to be saved, they must be got rid of.

      Everyone knows of Vidkun Quisling and why his name is infamous, but perhaps the future will judge PM Stoltenberg a worse traitor; and perhaps judge Breivik–who at least loves his country–a little less harshly; though if he had attacked a mosque……well, you understand.

      I’m disgusted with Cameron; expected more. We do live in interesting times, eh?

      • Before I say this I will qualify that I do not endorse shooting civilians as a way to get attention to one’s causes.

        You say he should maybe have shot up a mosque- but the thing about Breivik is that he TRULY understood who the REAL enemies of his state are, the people who are resdponsible for enabling the takeover of his own country, and so went fter his revenge on what they loved most- their kids, kids who were being groomed for and to replace their parents as the socialistic multiculti power elite-

        As in our nations, without support of the left, without their complicity and enabling of this madness, without the indoctrination being received by our youth misnamed “higher education” it would not happen. And so we can see why Brevik did not shoot up a mosque or kill Muslims but went after the “useful idiots” of his own country

        • Isahiah, I agree with your comment–and said as much just after the massacre. I think you’ll agree there are two ways of looking at this–he could do what he did, and I agree with you there; or he could have shot up a mosque, and been vastly more popular in the Western world.

          I quite often monitor the blog sites on Verdens Gang and Dagbladet, and surprise–Breivik is not at all unpopular there; have several times seen the comment: “Breivik didn’t get enough of them!”

          What has consistently annoyed me has been the attitude of journalists who should have known better to just dismiss Breivik as a paranoid hate filled madman who “hated his own country”. They obviously missed the point completely, he loves his country–just hates what is happening to it. And many of these journalists were well known, big names?!

          • yes I would say to some he is a hero and to the media and labor parties a dastardly criminal- and they would not change no matter who he shot up- I also say that if gov’t refuses to address known problems people will go vigilante and take matters in own hands.
            It is a law of nature and physics that actions will be met by equal and opposite reactions- in all the countires where ISLAM has raised it’s ugly head, made attacks and where nothing was done- other groups to oppose them sprang up.

  3. they need to change their name to THE NEW YORK SLIMES!

    they are disgusting! i will never buy another one of their papers.havent purchased one in many years.
    other newsprint or magazines would include TIME.they also manage to sell us the left side of the story.
    boycott these asses.lets get them out of business of lies.

  4. Why is the Left suddenly unable to recognize totalitarianism?

    It seems the same thing happened in the uber-tolerant intrawar years in Germany. The nation went from “Caberet” to goose-steps as everyone said we must tolerate all.

If sharia law continues spreading, you'll have less and less freedom of speech - so speak while you can!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s