Jihadists Receiving Most Arms Sent to Syrian “Rebels”…with U.S. Funding

The war drums are getting louder and the Benghazi lies may be flushing out some dirty, pre-election laundry in Syria.

We told you numerous times that Obama/Clinton are funding the Syrian uprising with your tax dollars.

We also told you that they are knowingly Fighting On Same Side As Three Terrorist Groups In Syria. Witness Hillary Clinton in February 2012 admitting the following on video: (if anyone can clip it to youtube that would be great)

“We have a very dangerous set of actors in the region, Al-Qaeda, Hamas, and those who are on our terrorist list, to be sure, supporting – claiming to support the opposition.”

In July 2012, we heard this:

“You’ll notice in the last couple of months, the opposition has been strengthened,” a senior Obama administration official said Friday. “Now we’re ready to accelerate that.”

Strengthened with U.S. aid and arms because Obama/Holder have been allowing U.S. Syrian group to arm rebels, incl al Qaeda (and Hamas-linked CAIR Leader Part Of Syrian Opposition Council).

The NYT previously let slip that the U.S. was funding and directing the flow of weapons into Syria through the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, reaffirmed in this new piece. And coincidentally, what a better way to do that then through Jordan where Obama sent US forces to “protect” the Jordanian border just last week.

Forward to October 2012, with an election hanging in the balance, Obama officials are now tripping over themselves. via Jihadists Receiving Most Arms Sent to Syrian Rebels – NYTimes.com.

WASHINGTON — Most of the arms shipped at the behest of Saudi Arabia and Qatar to supply Syrian rebel groups fighting the government of Bashar al-Assad are going to hard-line Islamic jihadists, and not the more secular opposition groups that the West wants to bolster, according to American officials and Middle Eastern diplomats.

Behest of who?

That conclusion, of which President Obama and other senior officials are aware from classified assessments of the Syrian conflict that has now claimed more than 25,000 lives, casts into doubt whether the White House’s strategy of minimal and indirect intervention in the Syrian conflict is accomplishing its intended purpose of helping a democratic-minded opposition topple an oppressive government, or is instead sowing the seeds of future insurgencies hostile to the United States.

Like this Free Syrian Army terrorist’s video stating: We won’t stop until flag of jihad over White House.

“The opposition groups that are receiving the most of the lethal aid are exactly the ones we don’t want to have it,” said one American official familiar with the outlines of those findings, commenting on an operation that in American eyes has increasingly gone awry.

The United States is not sending arms directly to the Syrian opposition. Instead, it is providing intelligence and other support for shipments of secondhand light weapons like rifles and grenades into Syria, mainly orchestrated from Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The reports indicate that the shipments organized from Qatar, in particular, are largely going to hard-line Islamists.

American officials have been trying to understand why hard-line Islamists have received the lion’s share of the arms shipped to the Syrian opposition through the shadowy pipeline with roots in Qatar, and, to a lesser degree, Saudi Arabia. The officials, voicing frustration, say there is no central clearinghouse for the shipments, and no effective way of vetting the groups that ultimately receive them.

Is this the setup for a U.S. or U.N. invasion of Syria?

But, as also previously mentioned, Romney’s strategy is no different. In fact, it might be worse because it would likely cost more at no real benefit to Americans.

In a speech at the Virginia Military Institute last Monday, Mr. Romney said he would ensure that rebel groups “who share our values” would “obtain the arms they need to defeat Assad’s tanks, helicopters and fighter jets.” That suggests he would approve the transfer of weapons like antiaircraft and antitank systems that are much more potent than any the United States has been willing to put into rebel hands so far, precisely because American officials cannot be certain who will ultimately be using them.

But Mr. Romney stopped short of saying that he would have the United States provide those arms directly, and his aides said he would instead rely on Arab allies to do it. That would leave him, like Mr. Obama, with little direct control over the distribution of the arms.

November 6 won’t change much on this front except to ensure American taxpayers will be funding jihad ad infinitum.

Update: Others are picking up on this (h/t 1389 blog), a scandal is brewing:

Update 2: Former CIA op is coming to a similar conclusion, Arms Flow to Syria May Be Behind Benghazi Cover-Up:

“[F]alse information was either knowingly disseminated or was directed to be put out by senior policy officials for political reasons,” says Bill Gertz, citing intelligence officials. Some of those alleged “political reasons” may have had to do with ridiculous claims about the demise of Al Qaeda and the false promises of an “Arab Spring,” but others may be more deeply buried in an Al Qaeda-linked weapons supply line that was never supposed to become public.

18 thoughts on “Jihadists Receiving Most Arms Sent to Syrian “Rebels”…with U.S. Funding

  1. Pingback: Jihadists Receiving Most Arms Sent to Syrian “Rebels”…with U.S. Funding | Christianity, conservative politics, anti sharia, | Scoop.it

    • Are you so blind that you believe the leftist crap you read in the MSM? It’s true that Assad is in league with Iran, HOWEVER, who do you suppose the “rebels” the West (and you?) support, really are; and how do you think the Christians Assad tolerates will fare when/if Assad is toppled? By now, everyone should be wise to the fact that “rebels” means muslim brotherhood and strict sharia–and murdered Christians.

  2. Islam ” The Religion of Peace ” ; Sharia Law For All, Freedom For None. Islams teachings and its followers actions speak louder than words.


  4. the civil war in Syria is good for Bashar Asad because, this way, he can get rid of the Sunnies (Muslim Brothehood). This war is good for Israel to make both sides, who are talking about eliminating Israel, for now and at least ten more years, busy. The same war is good to break Turkey who is the head of the snake who aims to eliminate Israel although they look nice as if they are faithful member of NATO. Eventually, this war in Syria alone may save money and life for israel and for the United States of America who is not dum as those simple minded people think. Any money spent to support the rebels (Muslim Brotherhood or call them just terrorists) is good because it will elongate the war. Besides, Morsi is thinking to unite forces against Israel starting from Hamas. I don’t think this will ever happen because he himself is facing elimination war inside Egypt.

    • Yeah the war is good for England as Well ,muslim boy,,,,,the more dead muslims the better ,,,the less muslim scum to sneak into England ,,which means less white children being raped by muslim peadophiles,,and less bombs going off in London (remember 7/7.) And less heroin sold to white children , it says in the Koran that we (whites) are “FILTHY KUFFAR”,, look at that mussie scum that tried to set off a 1000 pound bomb in America and kill thousands again,,, so I hope all muslims die ,

  5. The more money we send the stronger they get… THANK YOU HILLARY! There has never been more damage done than by people who thought they were doing the right thing.

    • Every time money sent to the rebels, i.e., Muslim Brotherhood, it will do two things:

      1. Weaken Muslim extremists, who are really not Muslim in my view.
      2. It will save the life of an American soldier who is trageted anyway by a Muslim extremists. We should look at the same picture.

      I have never seen a better leader than FDR who had vision and executed the war effectively. It is the doctrine of the Democratic Party. Example of this behavior is how JFK handled the Soviet Missiles in Cuba.

      We all should stand for our country not for our party. No wonder a journalist in Baghdad threw his shoes at G.W.B. who enforced Iran, Shiettes in Iraq, and Hizbullah.

  6. Pingback: Obama’s Special License to U.S. Muslim Group to Fund Syrian “Rebels” Causes Concern « Creeping Sharia

  7. Pingback: Obama official signals end to war against al-Qaeda « Creeping Sharia

  8. Pingback: Ex-Obama official raising money in U.S. to arm jihadist-led opposition fighters « Creeping Sharia

  9. Pingback: Obama gives $15M more of your tax dollars to Syrian refugees « Creeping Sharia

  10. Pingback: Muslim Brotherhood now head of largest Islamic bloc OIC « Creeping Sharia

  11. Pingback: NYT ‘Forgets’ U.S. Already Arming Syrian Rebels, With Most Weapons Going to Jihadists « Creeping Sharia

  12. Pingback: Illinois: Muslim arrested, wanted to join group U.S. just named terror group | Creeping Sharia

If sharia law continues spreading, you'll have less and less freedom of speech - so speak while you can!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.