Minnesota: 5 Muslims petition court for ‘combatant immunity’ over ISIS support (updated)

Source: Alleged ISIL recruits from Twin Cities argue for ‘combatant immunity’ – StarTribune.com

Five Twin Cities men accused of plotting to go to fight alongside ISIL in Syria are asking a federal judge to drop murder conspiracy charges on grounds that they have “combatant immunity” under both common and international law.

They say combatants are immune from criminal prosecutions for acts of war, including murder, against military targets.

The five — Hamza Ahmed, brothers Adnan and Mohamed Farah, Abdirahman Daud and Guled Omar — are scheduled to appear in federal court in Minneapolis next week for a hearing on that and other motions in the case, which is set to go to trial May 9.

The men were charged last year with conspiring to leave the United States to fight with the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). In October, the government filed a new indictment that added a charge of conspiracy to commit murder, which attorneys for the men say should not apply.

“ISIL has engaged in atrocious acts,” attorneys for the five said in one motion. “But however one might describe it as an entity, it has an organized professional army engaged in traditional military warfare — an army with which the defendants are alleged to have intended to join in ‘combat.’ ”

Federal prosecutors who brought the case argued in a court filing last month that the men were “grossly mistaken” in claiming ISIL fighters are combatants as part of a regularly constituted military force.

The government considers ISIL a terrorist organization that does not meet the criteria “set forth in the Geneva Conventions by which a regular army is known,” the prosecutors said. That includes being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates, wearing a distinctive uniform, openly carrying arms and conducting operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.

Prosecutors also wrote that the current fighting in Syria has been determined a noninternational armed conflict — a battle between a nation-state and an insurgent group or between two rebel groups within the borders of a single country — which would invalidate any claims of combatant immunity. And even if the fighting in Syria were considered an international armed conflict, they said, the men can’t be considered combatants anyway.

“They are, if they must be categorized within the international law of armed conflict, best categorized as aspiring war criminals,” the prosecution said.

Two other defendants caught up in the federal probe, Zacharia Abdurahman and Hanad Musse, pleaded guilty in September to conspiracy to provide material support to a terrorist organization. Another, Abdullahi Yusuf, pleaded guilty to conspiracy in February and agreed to testify for the government. A tenth man, Abdirizak Warsame, was indicted in December.


Update: Federal Judge Denies Request to Dismiss Count in Minnesota Terror Case

A federal judge presiding over the case of five men accused of plotting to join the Islamic State group says he won’t dismiss the most serious charge against them.

The men—Hamza Naj Ahmed, Mohamed Abdihamid Farah, Adnan Abdihamid Farah, Abdirahman Yasin Daud and Guled Ali Omar—face counts including conspiracy to commit murder outside the United States. Defense attorneys tried to get that count dismissed, arguing that since the Islamic State group engages in combat, its members should have combatant immunity.

The doctrine of combatant immunity protects soldiers from being prosecuted for lawful acts committed during war.

Judge Michael Davis says the doctrine doesn’t apply because the group is a designated terrorist organization and the men are charged in the context of terrorist activities.

The men are friends in Minnesota’s Somali community who prosecutors say planned to go to Syria. They face trial in May.

5 Responses

  1. First, these are Somali immigrants that Obama allowed into our Country. These Muslims practice Sharia, so I am not surprised that they support ISIS. Second, ISIS is engaged in Genocide. Anyone, any nation, that supports ISIS is complicit in genocide. These men should be tried for supporting crimes against humanity at the very least. Finally, the Geneva Convention states that enemy combatants out of uniform may be shot on site. So, lets take these Muslims out and shoot them!

  2. Fine. But the penalty for combatants out of uniform behind your lines is summary execution. works for me.

  3. The Judge should just have them hung from the nearest tree. They are enemies of the United States and we should treat them as such.

  4. So will America allow what is happening in europe?
    They don’t even belong here. .put their head on a stake ,why are we treating muzzies with kid gloves!!
    They want to take over and kill us in the process.

If sharia law continues spreading, you'll have less and less freedom of speech - so speak while you can!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: