If you want to know what a man really thinks of his wife, make sure his wife isn’t with him when you ask him. And if you want to know what a woman really thinks of her husband, make sure her husband isn’t around when asking.
Because in dignified surroundings when people are watching, politically correct answers are “de rigueur”. Only when people no longer think anyone is watching (or are too inebriated to care) will the truth come out.
Why This Matters…
When political polls are taken, Joe Sixpack responds as if he’s a devout believer and the Vicar is listening.
But put him in a voting booth where nobody can see which box is getting checked and it’s as if Joe’s 10 beers down on a raucous night out with the boys at the local strip club – the truth comes out.
Society operates at a mass scale level. The German word zeitgeist explains it better than any other”:
“The Zeitgeist (spirit of the age or spirit of the time) is the dominant set of ideals and beliefs that motivate the actions of the members of a society in a particular period in time.”
Identifying any problem is over 80% of the solution, which is why most people don’t know what to do because they don’t really understand the problem.
Adding to this is the fact that today we have vested interests doing their best to obscure the facts. But as more people wake up to and identify the facts and thus the problem we get the sort of changes taking place that stun the status quo.
My interest is purely in ensuring I’m adequately positioned for this with my capital and life. Here I’m simply pointing out that which goes unsaid.
Recently I read this article about a gang of “men” who gang-raped a 21 year old Swedish woman, streaming the video on Facebook while gloating over the attack.
Disturbingly comments on the Facebook stream were complementary and encouraging. The comments were from muslims who believe that western women are “unclean” and “deserve” to be raped. The rapists were all immigrant muslims, which you’re not allowed to mention in today’s PC world. Simply mentioning the facts opens one to cries of racism.
My initial thoughts were that the rapists, together with those encouraging them online, should all be rounded up and shot without hesitation.
To hell with assigning them legal representation paid for by the state.
To hell with employing clinical psychologists who will try convince us of traumatic childhoods, and to hell with the inevitable months of “due process” resulting in – at worst – a couple of years in the slammer after which these vermin will be released on good behaviour.
Ask yourself this…
Who agrees with me?
Who is willing to agree with me in public?
Who is willing to retweet this very article and put their name to it in agreement?
That number grows by the day but we’re still living in a twilight zone where agreeing with what I’ve just suggested is a big no-no.
Why? Not because I’ve suggested these animals be shot but because I mentioned two things which the politically correct West steadfastly refuses to acknowledge.
I mentioned immigrants and muslims.
Why did I do that? Because that’s who committed the crimes. Now, imagine the rapists were in fact atheist, fat, middle aged white men. Replace the words “immigrant” and “muslim” with “atheist, fat, middle aged white men” and tell me, would you be called racist for doing so? No.
The answer you’ll find is that it would sound absurd to suggest I’m racist towards fat, atheist, middle aged white men, and yet by stating the fact that the criminals are in fact both immigrants and muslims the politically correct West will eat me alive.
Why is this?
Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that there is no epidemic of fat, middle aged white men raping women, driving trucks and cars into people, rioting, murdering, and blowing themselves up to the cry of Allahu Akbar. I assure you that if that were the case, I’d name them just as readily but there are not.
And yet we cannot say such things…
Side story: I was contacted by the editor of a major financial publication who is a reader of the blog. Here is the message:
We all know that an open discussion is desperately required. Facing reality and identifying the problem is, as mentioned, at least 80% of the solution, and yet this is not allowed.
When the open discussion of extremely serious problems such as the daily atrocities committed by immigrants in the name of Islam is prevented, then the lid on the pot bobbles. Silently, behind closed doors, or intoxicated at parties but when honesty is laid bare, people seek someone – anyone – who will put an end to the insanity. With brutal force if necessary.
Daily we wait now for the next event. Beheadings of priests, trucks being driven into crowds of innocent families, stabbings of random people going about their everyday affairs, rapes of woman and children… all to the cry of Allahu Akbar.
Daily, it arrives.
While afraid to say so publicly how many in private think: is it not time to bring in the military, round them all up, put them on a ship with a jammed rudder and aim it at North Africa?
With no end in sight and the PC infested establishment refusing to acknowledge, let alone deal with the issues, the zeitgeist silently but rapidly shifts towards those who promise to do something -no matter how ugly or violent it may look.
Left unchecked, the passage of time combined with the daily mayhem unleashed on the streets, malls, and public spaces drives ordinary citizens ordinarily repulsed by violence to increasingly call for it. This is the future.
It doesn’t matter whether you or I think this good or bad. That’s not the point. It’s already happening and thousands of years of human nature prove it isn’t the first time.
Read it all.