Catholic Prelates ‘unqualified support of Muslim immigration a failure to their followers’

Source: Catholic Prelates and Muslim Immigration – Catholic Journal

For almost two millennia, Christianity has survived innumerable challenges from without, including heresies, schisms and philosophical “isms,” as well as more than a few challenges from within. But the most dangerous challenge of all may be one that was overcome seven centuries ago but is now regenerated—the challenge posed by Islam. Its agents no longer wield battle axes and scimitars, as their militant predecessors did. They travel instead in the peaceful garb of immigrants and refugees. Their stated purpose for migrating is to find opportunity or to escape persecution and in many cases that claim is no doubt genuine. Yet even in those cases, their Muslim belief obligates them to replace the host country’s ethical, legal, and religious culture with their own Sharia system.

There are two reasons doctrinaire Islam may succeed where militant Islam failed. The first is that the same European countries that for twenty-five generations conducted Crusades against Islam now have political leaders who welcome Muslim migrants in numbers that, given both their beliefs and their prolific birth rate, ensure the eventual overwhelming of Western culture and Judeo-Christian values.

The second, no less ironic reason is that today the institution most responsible for the defeat of militant Islam—the Catholic Church—is by its position on immigration supporting doctrinaire Islam.  This assertion may seem incredible to some readers, so let me present the evidence that supports it.

On the issue of immigration in general and Muslim immigration in particular, the Catholic hierarchy’s perspective has been unwavering.

The Catholic prelates’ unwavering support of lenient immigration policy is frequently in the news, in part it would seem because the mainstream media here and abroad share that view. One might expect that such frequent and favorable exposure, together with the prelates’ prestige as moral and spiritual leaders, would guarantee acceptance by a great majority of religious people. And yet that is not the case!

American Catholic lay people tend to oppose the prelates’ view on immigration, as do Jews, Mainline Protestants (MLPs), and Born-Again Protestants (BAPs).

The reason that Germans and most other Europeans tend to harbor negative attitudes toward Muslim immigrants, Murray explains, is not hardheartedness or bigotry but instead a refusal to accept immigrants bringing to their countries a belief system that not only rejects theirs but also is intent on undermining it, an intention made evident by the events in Europe in recent decades.

Rome, the USCCB, and other conferences of bishops tend to dismiss the view of such laypeople as biblically and theologically uninformed. They claim that both the Gospels and Christian tradition require us to see Christ in our neighbors and to welcome them into our midst in Christian love. Although that claim is basically correct, their application of it to the issue of Muslim immigration is at best highly questionable.

Msgr. Charles Pope has remarked on the complexity of the issue of immigration and the importance of intellectual balance in dealing with it. As a model of such balance, he offers St. Thomas Aquinas’ reasoning on the matter.

Though Thomas affirms the gospel requirement of loving neighbor as self and treating those in need with loving kindness, Pope explains, he adds an important qualification, one that I believe the prelates have clearly ignored:

With regard to [foreigners wishing citizenship], a certain order was observed [by the Jews]. For [foreigners] were not at once admitted to citizenship: just as it was law with some nations that no one was deemed a citizen except after two or three generations . . . The reason for this was that if foreigners were allowed to meddle with the affairs of a nation as soon as they settled down in its midst, many dangers might occur, since the foreigners not yet having the common good firmly at heart might attempt something hurtful to the people. [Thomas goes on to say that the Jews admitted some people to citizenship “after the third generation,” but denied citizenship forever to “hostile” people; and “held as foes in perpetuity” those who were exceedingly hostile.] (Summa Theologica I-II, Q. 105, Art. 3).

St. Thomas’ reasoning is especially relevant to the present issue of Muslim immigration. After all, during his lifetime (1225-1274) three of the nine Crusades were fought in response to the Muslim conquest of Europe and the Holy Land. If Thomas were alive today, he would undoubtedly perceive that, though the means of today’s Muslim effort are different—immigration and population growth rather than the sword—the end of displacing Christianity is the same. (See also St. Thomas’ views of Mohammed and Islam.)

St. Thomas is not the only distinguished Catholic intellectual whose view of Muslim immigration is at odds with the present Magisterium’s thinking. Another is Bishop Fulton J. Sheen. In The World’s First Love: Mary, the Mother of God, (1952) Sheen wrote this:

At the present time, the hatred of the Moslem countries against the West is becoming a hatred against Christianity itself. Although the statesmen have not yet taken it into account, there is still grave danger that the temporal power of Islam may return and, with it, the menace that it may shake off a West which has ceased to be Christian, and affirm itself as a great anti-Christian world power.

Sheen’s comment was clearly prophetic because fully 65 years after he wrote it, there is ample evidence that “the goal of [Muslim] migration . . . is not peaceful assimilation to the political system and mores of the host country.

In conclusion, the Prelates’ unqualified support of Muslim immigration constitutes a serious failure to provide intellectual and moral guidance and example to their followers. More importantly, it does a grave disservice to the tens of thousands of Christians of all denominations who have been persecuted by Muslim extremists and the millions more who will suffer if Western culture is replaced by Sharia.

Read it all.

5 thoughts on “Catholic Prelates ‘unqualified support of Muslim immigration a failure to their followers’

  1. Personally I’m sick and tired of the perpetual demeaning and debasing of my our Catholic faith however more offensive and salacious the clergy apologetics feeding the Muslim Brotherhood front and public enemy number one CAIR is Hamas false narratives, propagating insurgents rape pillage and subjugation of the most important lessons I’ve learned from both the catechism of the Catholic church Holy Bible and word of the living loving most merciful God * I didn’t come to be served rather I came to serve” not fucking jihad surrender or appeasement of Islamist to hell with the liberal demonic misguided hypocrisy your absolutely correct just as to the national tragedy of Islamism conflation it’s not outside conflicts of destruction rather from within

  2. to all the people who are hating and attacking the different groups there are in america that are based on different beliefs and ideologies, if you continue to attack the groups that are against your own gruop or beliefs, then you are no better than the people who you are attacking or who are attacking you. People say they want to be equal but seperate but equal is not equal

    • You should come & live in the UK, where 1400 girls in Rotherham alone were groomed by Pakinstani Muslim gangs. 5,000 in the Sandwell area and it’s going on in many more areas and was ignored by PC police & Politicians. These Muslims believe it’s their right. As a Catholic & I think it’s very wrong to import then endanger young girls and also put in great jeopardy our Faith

  3. Islam (the Quran, supposedly the allah god’s word to Muhammad via the angel Gabriel) denies Jesus Christ’s divinity and death on the cross. These are LIES against the Gospels written 600 years before the Quran by eye witnesses. Muhammad had no witnesses to his claimed revelations, some of which were personally favorable to him. Sura 9-5 of the Quran calls for “slaying Pagans” and Sura 9-29 calls for fighting Christians and Jews until subjugated and Sura 2-193 calls for fighting until the religion is supreme. There are at least a 100 more hate filled violent verses against us unbelievers. These hate filled teaching are opposite Christ’ s teachings of love and forgiveness. Relative to the LIES…Jesus says in John 8:44 that Satan is the father of all lies. The Islamic allah god is Satan based on Jesus’ words. One would think the Pope and Catholic Church leaders would come to the same conclusion. The Christian God and the God of Abraham is certainly not the same God as the Islamic allah god. Franklin Graham and Cardinal Burke have come to that conclusion. What is blinding the Pope and other Church leaders? They are “BLIND GUIDES”.

If sharia law continues spreading, you'll have less and less freedom of speech - so speak while you can!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.