California: City Official’s Job In Jeopardy From Terror-Linked Muslim Group CAIR

CAIR is not only terror-linked, but named a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates.

cair-terror

via City Official’s Job In Jeopardy For Sharing A Steven Crowder Article On Facebook.

Art Barrios is city planning commissioner for the town of El Monte in California. For now.

The former city councilman and mayor candidate is under fire from CAIR, a Muslim “civil liberties advocacy organization”(yeah, right), and the local media for sharing an article from THIS website regarding China’s policy toward Islam. Now he is paying a steep price.

For this posting, Barrios is now under fire and his job is in question, thanks to pressure from, and demands by, CAIR:

video omitted

Caving to the pressure, Barrios has been cornered into apologizing for sharing an article on his Facebook page in what appears to be a bid to save his job.

“I made a mistake. I wrote something that I didn’t mean to write,” the former city councilman said. “I read (the blog post). But I misinterpreted it. I was thinking Islamic terrorists, not the people of Islam, the religion.”

This attack on someone for sharing an article from this website comes in the wake of our recent article breaking the story on Osama Siblani, a Muslim businessman and activist based in Michigan who claimed, on television, that Pamela Geller is “worse than ISIS.” LouderWithCrowder.com also broke the fact that Osama himself had voiced known support to terrorist organizations, and expressed anti-semitic views. The most offensive part? That we weren’t even shocked.

It follows our wildly successful expose on Muslim bakeries and the left’s hypocritical stand on gay marriage.

And it comes just ahead of our very important interview with a convert from Islam that will be airing tomorrow on the Louder With Crowder program.

Freedom of speech has been in the news a lot lately, and it is more than apparent that the once hallowed and most fundamental freedom, is less valued and treasured today than at almost any time in American history. Organizations like CAIR are the reason why. There is an active, designed and coordinated campaign in America, supported wittingly or unwittingly by a cowardly and compliant media, to silence any who dare speak ill of the world’s most thin-skinned, backward, and barbaric religion.

But this should be no surprise. As you’ll hear in our explosive interview tomorrow, freedom and the constitution are not priorities for Muslim interest groups in America. Indeed it is commonplace to circumvent not only American values and traditions, but our very legal structure, in pursuit of Islamist ideals.

Art Barrios shared a Facebook post of an article from our website. And because of that he may lose his job. Will you be next?


Gallery of Terror-Linked CAIR Leaders

CAIRdiorama32

To Protect Islam, MTA Will Ban All Political Ads on NYC Subways And Buses

Banning ads that expose Islam and its violent ideology, banning politicians from entering the U.S., banning movies and cartoons about Muhammad. Are we not living under the initial phase of sharia law already? We are being forced into dhimmitude. Enslaved.

via MTA To Ban All Political Advertising On NYC Subways And Buses After Court Allows ‘Killing Jews’ Ad.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) is expected to pass a resolution at a board meeting Wednesday banning all political advertising on its subways and buses after the agency’s finance committee approved it earlier this week. The move comes after a judge allowed a pro-Israel group to display an advertisement with a phrase, “Hamas Killing Jews,” on New York City’s buses.

The MTA said such advertisements accounted for less than $1 million of its annual advertising revenue of $138 million, leading to the approval of the ban by the finance committee. The decision was prompted by security concerns, the Associated Press (AP) reported. Several other cities such as Los Angeles, Chicago and Philadelphia have already banned political advertisements on public transit.

“Advertisements expressing viewpoint messages, regardless of the viewpoint being expressed, would no longer be accepted,” Jerome Page, MTA’s general counsel, told the committee on Monday, according to the AP.

MTA board member Charles Moerdler hailed the cash-strapped MTA’s decision. “Hateful speech, with its odious appeal to intolerance, is the incendiary that ignites violence and ultimately destroys free and democratic institutions,” he said, the AP reported.

However, board member Allen Cappelli said the agency should not take away the right of free speech just because a few “hateful people” tried to take advantage of the right. “I am really sad to see management attempting to go down this road,” Cappelli told the AP, adding: “I believe very strongly that the antidote to hateful speech is more free speech.”

In August, the MTA had notified the group behind the controversial advertisement — the American Freedom Defense Initiative — that it was willing to display three of the four proposed ads, but not the one with the “killing Jews” caption. Following this, the group filed a lawsuit challenging the agency’s decision.

The MTA had argued saying that the ad could incite violence, but Judge John Koeltl said last week that the ad was protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution that allows free speech. Koeltl, however, gave the parties a month’s time to appeal the ruling.

The advertisement showed a man who had covered his face and the caption next to him read: “Killing Jews is Worship that draws us close to Allah,” attributed to Hamas MTV. The caption further said, “That’s his Jihad. What’s yours?”

Koeltl had said that the MTA and Chairman Thomas Prendergast “underestimate the tolerant quality of New Yorkers and overestimate the potential impact of these fleeting advertisements. It strains credulity to believe that New Yorkers would be incited to violence by ads that did not incite residents of Chicago and San Francisco.”


And if you think the MTA Board sides with the terrorists, via MTA Board Member: “[The ads] make me want to strangle the life out of the person who took them out” (minute 1:40).

 

Philly: After losing free speech case, transit authority will end political ads to protect Muslims

via Blog: Philly transit agency to evade federal court decision in attempt to stifle anti-sharia free speech. By Thomas Lifson

Score a (temporary) victory for the right of Americans to point out the Jew-hatred embedded in the foundations of Muslim theology. The American Freedom Defense Initiative, led by Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, has won a victory in federal court prohibiting the Southeast Pennsylvania Transit Authority from banning its ads that point out Islamic Jew-hatred. SEPTA, which operates buses and trains around Philadelphia, will not appeal the court decision, but instead will evade it by changing its policy so as to reject all political advertising, thereby avoiding the problem of “viewpoint discrimination” that led the court to decide against it.

Paul Nussbaum writes in the Philadelphia Inquirer:

SEPTA will not appeal a federal court ruling that the transit authority must accept virulently anti-Muslim advertising on its buses, SEPTA officials said Thursday. (snip)

The black-and-white ads proclaim “Jew Hatred: It’s in the Quran” and feature a photograph of a 1941 meeting between Hitler and Hajj Amin al-Husseini, a Palestinian Arab nationalist who made radio broadcasts supporting the Nazis.

The ad will start appearing on the sides of 84 SEPTA buses as early as next week and will be displayed for a month, under terms of a $30,000 contract, SEPTA officials said.

The ad was produced by the American Freedom Defense Initiative, a New Hampshire-based nonprofit organization, which argued in legal filings that the ad was germane and timely “in light of the fact that many Jews (and Christians) are being persecuted in Islamic countries in the Middle East.”

U.S. District Judge Mitchell S. Goldberg ruled March 11 that because SEPTA had accepted other political and controversial ads on public issues, it could not refuse to accept the Hitler ad. (snip)

SEPTA officials said they decided it was unwise to spend the money to pursue an appeal they were likely to lose, especially since the loser in the case would have to pay the legal fees for both sides.

Writing in Breitbart, Pamela Geller explains:

Victory! But don’t applaud too loudly. The Philly transit authority has declared they will no long accept political ads. The Geller Ban is back. This is not the first time city authorities have changed the rules in response to an AFDI free speech victory.

Longtime supporters of my work are familiar with my numerous court cases in the defense of free speech. Now, after winning another such case, we are about to run our first ad campaign in Philadelphia, and apparently our last. (snip)

Time and time again, various city officials and dictatorial bureaucrats have censored or banned outright our ads of truth and freedom, while allowing the most fallacious and libelous anti-Jewish, pro-jihad message to run. The mainstream media piles on, as in thePhiladelphia Inquirer story about this rule change, which calls our ads “virulently anti-Muslim,” without ever bothering to discover whether or not Islamic Jew-hatred really is in the Qur’an, or to consider whether it is really wise of the U.S. government to give aid to countries that encourage that hatred.

Sharia law prohibits criticism of Mohammed or Islam, and to a shocking degree American governmental entities do their best to comply.  SEPTA tells the Inquirer that it worries about vandalism, which is capitulating to bullies, or, as it is called in court, the “heckler’s veto.”  Bullying is part and parcel of the way Islam deals with its critics, and because establishing the global caliphate is the aim, many Muslims will not rest until they succeed in stifling all criticism, regardless of First Amendment guarantees in this country.

 

Virginia: Convicted South Park terror wannabe wanted baby to be jihadi too

We knew this Muslim rat had used his infant son as a human shield on his way to wage jihad. But after he was convicted and his wife deported, they still wanted to raise the poor baby to be a jihadi. The sanity of the judge and the grandparents have so far prevailed.

via Court hears appeal in terror-related custody dispute

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A lawyer for a radical Muslim convert imprisoned for supporting terrorism urged a federal appeals court Thursday to revive the man’s parental rights lawsuit, which a judge had dismissed as frivolous.

Jason LaFond told a three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that Zachary Chesser’s complaint against his mother and FBI agents, while lengthy and complicated, was not fanciful and was supported by numerous documents.

The judge who dismissed the lawsuit “didn’t say whether it was factually or legally frivolous, but it was neither,” LaFond said.

Court papers show that Chesser attempted to join the al-Shabab terrorist group in Somalia, taking his baby with him to the airport in an attempt to look less suspicious.

It didn’t work. Chesser, who had attracted law enforcement attention after posting threats against the creators of “South Park” for cartoons he felt insulted the prophet Muhammad, was arrested and pleaded guilty in 2010 to attempting to support terrorist groups and threatening violence online. He was sentenced to 25 years in prison.

His wife – Proscovia Nzabanita, the daughter of a Ugandan diplomat – was forced to leave the U.S. for lying to investigators about her husband’s activities.

Chesser’s mother, Barbara Chesser, won custody of the couple’s baby and is raising him with her partner. The young couple “opposed placing the young boy with his grandparents, who did not share Chesser and his wife’s conservative Islamic beliefs,” LaFond wrote in his client’s appeal.

Keep in mind this is the same Muslim dog who Encourages Parents to Teach Children about Jihad.

The lawsuit says FBI agents monitoring his prison conversations tipped off Barbara Chesser, a senior lawyer in the Office of the Attorney General in the District of Columbia, that the couple was making plans with a friend to take the boy to Jordan to be raised by Nzabanita. Soon after, a judge awarded custody of the boy to Barbara Chesser.

Interesting, his mother is a a senior lawyer in the Office of the Attorney General in the District of Columbia.

Zachary Chesser’s lawsuit seeks monetary damages, not custody. He says his privacy was invaded when FBI agents disclosed his plans to his mother.

Privacy? In taxpayer-funded prison?

U.S. Justice Department attorney Lowell Sturgill urged the appeals court to uphold U.S. District Judge Liam O’Grady’s decision, although he conceded that the judge should be required to explain his reasoning on the privacy issue.

The court typically rules several weeks after hearing arguments.

Michigan: Judge dismisses lawsuit, rules threat of Islamic jihad trumps freedom of speech, assembly

Updates on posts here, here and here: The Rest of the Story. via (Bush-appointed) Judge tosses Dave Agema’s suit after self-professed ex-Muslim terrorist’s speech shut down | MLive.com.

ALLEGAN, MI – A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit against Allegan Public Schools after police shut down a self-professed ex-Muslim terrorist’s speech at the high school over safety concerns.

The ruling brings to an end a lawsuit that former state Rep. Dave Agema, R-Grandville, and other organizers filed after Allegan Police Chief Rick Hoyer shut down the speech after he learned that the speaker had a $25 million bounty on his head.

Event organizers – Agema, Elizabeth Griffin, Mark Gurley and Willis Sage – arranged for Kalam Saleem [sic], a self-professed former terrorist who teaches the dangers of radical Islam, to speak Jan. 26, 2012, at Allegan High School.

The organizers said that Saleem “has a unique perspective on the internal threat to America posed by Sharia law and radical Muslims as he was once a Muslim involved in terrorist activities who has since transformed himself and converted to Christianity.”

Others, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR-MI, and People for the American Way, dispute his claims he was once an Islamic terrorist, and contacted the school district before the event occurred.

The author’s tagline at the end of the article reads, “John Agar covers crime for MLive.” John Agar is either ignorant of CAIR’s criminal history or purposely concealing it from readers. CAIR is a designated Islamic terrorist group in the UAE and named a Hamas front group by the United States, banned by the FBI, with many of its leaders jailed or deported. Check the HAMAS-CAIR section, lower left of the home page.

The event was to take place from 6-9 p.m. at Allegan High School. Organizers had asked two police officers be present for the event.

Allegan city police, including Chief Hoyer, were at the scene. Shortly before it was to begin, a woman told police “that Kamal Saleem had a $25 million bounty on his head,” records showed.

CAIR complained.

A police officer talked to Saleem’s bodyguard, who didn’t deny the existence of the bounty. The bodyguard “further stated that there had been death threats directed toward Kamal Saleem from Islamic terrorists in the past,” records showed.

Hoyer ordered the event shut down while Saleem was speaking.

Agema and the others filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court against the City of Allegan, its police chief and officers, Allegan Public Schools and the leaders of CAIR-MI and People for the American Way. U.S. District Judge Janet Neff has dismissed the cases.

The plaintiffs argued that their rights to freedom of speech and assembly were violated, that the school district, which charged $90 for the room, breached its contract and that CAIR-MI and People for the American Way, by contacting the school district, were guilty of “tortious interference of a contract.”

Neff dismissed the final claims, against the school district, on Monday, March 9.

“The School District Defendants assert that the testimony in this case has instead consistently confirmed that it was the report of the bounty, death threats and security concerns that motivated the termination. Indeed, the School District Defendants opine that ‘(had) Defendants been motivated by an intent to muzzle Mr. Saleem based on the letter received from CAIR or objects voiced through telephone calls, they would have refused to allow the event commence rather than cancel it mid-stream,” the judge said.

She said that even if police and school officials mistakenly assessed the risk of danger, the plaintiffs could not show they acted unreasonably.

She cited a previous ruling that said the government didn’t have to wait “‘until havoc is wreaked to restrict access to a nonpublic forum.'”

Neff has earlier ruled that police Chief Hoyer’s decision to halt the speech after hearing the bodyguard report death threats by Islamic extremists “was a reasonable safety precaution and a legitimate reaction to a potentially dangerous situation at a public high school.”

The plaintiffs argued that hecklers were the “true cause” of the speech being stopped.


Indeed, it was CAIR who shut this down because of the content of the speech. And when the event went forward, they pulled a last minute stunt leveraging their co-religionists as a threat to full advantage. As eyewitness and Allegan County Commissioner wrote to us, there was never even a hint of a threat:

At the event, 3 officers instead of 1 showed up at 5:40 pm, there were no threats; there were no picketers, no protesters. We were about 1/4 of the way through Kamal’s speech, of which, “was about protecting our Constitution from Sharia law” and there were no threats to this event! Kamal Saleem has spoken at several venues consisting of Colleges and Schools, never being shut down, with any threat whatsoever. Kamal’s unarmed body guard had explained that, along with the issue “of the rumors” to the officers in detail, about the price on his head and that it was a rumor from 5 years ago!

The Sunset Lanes (where we finished the Allegan venue) on the 26th, 1st assembly of God in GR on the 25th, Streeters Center in Traverse City on the 27th and finally the Moline Baptist Church on the 29th Of January 2012, with Kamal speaking at each event, were all advertised and accomplished in the same week without any threat to the public and without incident!

The true Islamophobes are Chief Hoyer and Judge Neff.

Brooklyn: Muslim who refused to ring up pork suing Costco

via Former employee suing Costco for religious discrimination, happened at Sunset Park location | 7online.com. h/t BNI whose piece is titled: NEVER HIRE A MUSLIM Reason #134

(WABC) — A man is suing Costco for religious discrimination.

He tells Eyewitness News exclusively that when he refused to work with pork, the major retailer sent him outside to gather carts.

“Just because you have a different belief, that doesn’t give anybody the right to treat you different,” said Jean Camara, suing Costco.

That’s why Jean Camara says he’s doing what he’s doing, suing Costco for religious employment discrimination.

The devout Muslim says he was working as a cashier’s assistant at the Costco in Sunset Park Brooklyn in September of 2012 when pork came across the conveyor belt.

It’s against his religious beliefs to touch either pork or alcohol.

Actually, the devout Muslim is either a) ignorant of his so-called religion b) lying or c) both. So says an imam:

Local Imams told The Arab American News that Muslims are allowed to scan and sell pork products if they work for an establishment that requires them to do so.

Camara says after telling his managers this, they transferred him outside collecting the shopping carts.

Camara says they never told him why he was reassigned.

Is being told why you’re reassigned some sort of employment law? He didn’t want to do his job that included ringing up pork-buying infidels.

“I think that as the case progresses in the trial we are in now, I think the facts are going to come out and they’re going to speak for themselves,” said Chauncey Henry, Camara’s attorney.

Camara says he asked his managers if he could work in the electronics department, but his requests were repeatedly denied.

He ended up filing a human rights complaint against the company.

16 days later, he was fired for insubordinate conduct.

“We all share different beliefs so we all should be treated equally no matter what belief we have,” Camara said.

“It’s not OK to discriminate against someone for their religion. It isn’t OK. It isn’t OK to treat them differently others because of what they believe in. I think that everyone is entitled to the same treatment. I think that’s what this case is about,” Henry said.

It’s not ok to falsely accuse employers of discrimination either. This frivolous lawsuit should be thrown out and the devout Muslim should be made to pay all Costco’s expenses and the court costs.

Michigan: Muslim wages legal jihad after arrested for driving illegally, told to remove hijab for mugshot

via The Arab American News – Local Muslim woman filing lawsuit against Dearborn Heights Police for forcing her to remove hijab during arrest. h/t Dee

hijab-jihadist

DEARBORN HEIGHTS – A 27-year-old local Muslim woman is filing a lawsuit against the Dearborn Heights Police department for forcing her to remove her hijab when she was arrested and booked for a traffic misdemeanor offense on July 9, 2014.

Malak Kazan said she was humiliated by the department’s policy, which required her to remove her scarf when she was detained for driving on a suspended license. As part of the booking process, Kazan was asked to remove her hihab for her mug shot.

Kazan allegedly expressed concern about the policy to the police men on duty, claiming it was a violation of her religion. She allegedly asked for a female police officer, but was told they couldn’t provide her with one.

After growing frustration, Kazan was able to speak to a supervisor, who told her that removing head wear was part of the department’s policy and that she needed to comply or she would be further detained.

Local Attorney Amir Makled from the Law Office of Cyril C. Hall, is filing the case at the U.S. District Court this week. He is demanding the department change its policy and is also seeking both compensatory and punitive damages for his client.

“To be exposed in front of men who aren’t part of her immediate family is a serious breach of faith and practice,” said Makled. “She has a sincere belief in her religion and to be demanded to remove her scarf is a clear violation. She felt extremely humiliated.”

After Kazan was forced to remove her hijab for her mug shot, she was allegedly told she couldn’t put it back on while she was in custody.

This incident marks the latest in several discriminatory claims launched against the city of Dearborn Heights and its police department.

In late 2014, the American Arab Civil Rights League (ACRL) also filed a suit against the city claiming that its police officers lacked diversity training and treated Muslim Americans like “second class citizens.”

Makled called on Dearborn Heights Police Chief Lee Gavin to provide the police force with extensive diversity training in order to better reflect the city’s multi-cultured residents.

“It’s clear to me that the city needs further diversity training and more diversity is needed in the police force,” Makled said. “Their policies need to be reviewed and need to reflect and serve the constituents in the city.”

The officers who took Kazan into custody and were involved in her booking process have yet to be identified. The lawsuit is listing the city, its police department, the officers who booked Kazan and Chief Gavin as the defendants on the case.

Kazan told The Arab American News that she wants to set a precedent with her incident so that other Muslim women aren’t placed in similar circumstances with local authorities.

“I honestly don’t want other women to be put in my position, where they are forced to take off their scarf in front of men they don’t know,” Kazan said. “I was so upset. It was such an uncomfortable feeling. I’ve worn my scarf for 12 years and my religion says that I can’t take it off. It’s not just a religious issue; this is a part of me – It’s my culture, my life and my identity.”

Makled said he commends Kazan for having the courage to come forward and be open about her incident.

“It’s absolutely brave for her to come forward and to discuss this openly in public,” Makled added. “It’s a good showing of her character. She wants to be the trailblazer for this new policy change that we are trying to implement.”

Makled believes there are other women in the city who could’ve possibly encountered similar experiences with the department, but may have been too embarrassed to come forward. He is hoping the case will prompt policy changes at the local municipalities.

“We hope this case can be a learning point for other departments,” Makled added. “I do believe this has happened to other residents within the city of Dearborn Heights and if there are women that want to come forward, please contact me so we can work together collectively to change this policy.”


 

Islamic ambulance chasing to terrorize kufr cops. Terror-linked and listed Muslim Brotherhood-front group CAIR:

…tells The Arab American News that the civil rights organization has successfully collaborated with the Canton and Hamtramck Police Departments to accommodate hijab attire during the lock up process.

However, their attempts were unsuccessful in both Dearborn and Dearborn Heights.

According to Walid, CAIR-MI met with Dearborn Heights Mayor Dan Paletko and Chief Gavin to discuss religious friendly accommodations almost two years ago. They also met with senior officers in Dearborn to discuss similar policies, but have yet to see the departments take any pro-active measures.

Stand your ground mayor, no more sharia accommodations!

Apparently this Muslim broad is no stranger to law enforcement, and had a previous booking photo:

Malak Kazan pictured in a previous booking photo.

Malak Kazan pictured in a previous booking photo.

Clearly she has no regard for American laws, via Fox2:

Kazan had let her driver’s license expire and there were two warrants for her arrest because she never appeared in court. In November of 2014, she was booked and detained.

“Articles such as hats, caps, hijabs, can contain concealable items that could pose a threat or chance of injury to the cops or to themselves,” said Dearborn Heights Police Chief Lee Garvin.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 43,683 other followers

%d bloggers like this: